Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:10:46.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prospective Surveillance Effectively Reduced Rates of Surgical Site Infection Associated With Elective Colorectal Surgery at a University Hospital in Japan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Tsuyoshi Konishi*
Affiliation:
Departments of Surgical Oncology, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Toshiaki Watanabe
Affiliation:
Departments of Surgical Oncology, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Keita Morikane
Affiliation:
Infectious Diseases Surveillance Center, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan
Kazuhiko Fukatsu
Affiliation:
Division of Basic Traumatology, National Defense Medical College Research Institute, Saitama, Japan
Joji Kitayama
Affiliation:
Departments of Surgical Oncology, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Naoyuki Umetani
Affiliation:
Departments of Surgical Oncology, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Junji Kishimoto
Affiliation:
Clinical Bioinformatics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Hirokazu Nagawa
Affiliation:
Departments of Surgical Oncology, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
*
Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan ([email protected])

Abstract

At a university hospital in Japan, the introduction of prospective surveillance and subsequent interventions was effective in reducing the rate of surgical site infection associated with elective colorectal surgery from 27.5% to 17.8% of surgeries. Japan should both recognize the importance of broader surveillance for surgical site infection and establish its own nationwide surveillance database.

Type
Concise Communications
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Mangram, AJ, Horan, TC, Pearson, ML, et al. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999; 20:250278.Google Scholar
2.Weiss, CA 3rd, Statz, CL, Dahms, RA, et al. Six years of surgical wound infection surveillance at a tertiary care center: review of the microbiologic and epidemiological aspects of 20,007 wounds. Arch Surg 1999; 134:10411048.Google Scholar
3.Olson, MM, Lee, JT Jr. Continuous, 10-year wound infection surveillance: results, advantages, and unanswered questions. Arch Surg 1990; 125:794803.Google Scholar
4.Cruse, PJ, Foord, R. The epidemiology of wound infection: a 10-year prospective study of 62,939 wounds. Surg Clin North Am 1980; 60:2740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Smith, RL, Bohl, JK, McElearney, ST, et al. Wound infection after elective colorectal resection. Ann Surg 2004; 239:599605.Google Scholar
6.National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report. Data summary from January 1992 through June 2003, issued August 2003. Am J Infect Control 2003; 31:481498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Morikane, K, Konishi, T, Nishioka, M, et al. Initiation of nationwide nosocomial infection surveillance in Japan [abstract]. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000; 21:156.Google Scholar
8.Morikane, K, Nishioka, M, Tanimura, H, et al. Using surveillance data to direct infection control efforts to reduce surgical-site infections following clean abdominal operations in Japan. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002; 23:404406.Google Scholar
9.Condon, RE, Schulte, WJ, Malangoni, MA, et al. Effectiveness of a surgical wound surveillance program. Arch Surg 1983; 118:303307.Google Scholar
10.Holtz, TH, Wenzel, RP. Postdischarge surveillance for nosocomial wound infection: a brief review and commentary. Am J Infect Control 1992; 20:206213.Google Scholar
11.Morita, T, Murata, A, Koyama, M, et al. Current status of autonomic nerve-preserving surgery for mid and lower rectal cancers: Japanese experience with lateral node dissection. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46:S78S87.Google ScholarPubMed