Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T19:22:15.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prolongation of Hospital Stay and Additional Costs Due to Nosocomial Bloodstream Infection in an Algerian Neonatal Care Unit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Mohamed Lamine Atif ,
Fetta Sadaoui ,
Abdeldjallil Bezzaoucha ,
Chawki Ahmed Kaddache ,
Rachida Boukari ,
Salima Djelato  and
Nora Boubechou
Mohamed Lamine Atif*
Affiliation:
Departments of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University Hospital of Blida, Zabana, Blida, Algeria
Fetta Sadaoui
Affiliation:
Pediatrics, University Hospital of Blida, Zabana, Blida, Algeria
Abdeldjallil Bezzaoucha
Affiliation:
Departments of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University Hospital of Blida, Zabana, Blida, Algeria
Chawki Ahmed Kaddache
Affiliation:
Pediatrics, University Hospital of Blida, Zabana, Blida, Algeria
Rachida Boukari
Affiliation:
Pediatrics, University Hospital of Blida, Zabana, Blida, Algeria
Salima Djelato
Affiliation:
Departments of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University Hospital of Blida, Zabana, Blida, Algeria
Nora Boubechou
Affiliation:
Departments of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University Hospital of Blida, Zabana, Blida, Algeria
*
Service d'épidémiologie et de médecine préventive, Hôpital Franz Fanon, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Blida, Zabana, 09000 Blida, Algeria ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background.

Previous studies from developed countries reported that nosocomial bloodstream infection (BSI) in neonatal care units (NCUs) increases length of stay and costs. However, no such information is available for Algerian NCUs.

Objective.

To evaluate the influence of BSI in neonates on additional charges and length of hospital stay.

Design.

Prospective, nested case-control study.

Setting.

The 47-bed NCU of the University Hospital of Blida, Algeria.

Patients and Methods.

A total of 83 neonates with BSIs (case patients) and 166 neonates without BSIs (control patients), admitted to the NCU during the study period (April 2004 through December 2007), were matched for sex, birth weight, length of NCU stay, and year of hospital admission. Each patient's length of stay in the NCU was obtained prospectively on daily rounds. The estimated cost of each NCU-day was provided by the hospital's finance department. The cost of antibiotics prescribed was provided by the hospital's pharmacy department.

Results.

The mean additional length of NCU stay for case patients, compared with control patients, was 9.2 days (24.3 vs 15.1 days). The mean additional cost of antibiotics was $546. The mean cumulative additional cost was $1,315.

Conclusion.

This study highlights the effect of BSI on extra costs for NCU patients, especially costs due to prolongation of hospital stay and increased antibiotic use, and suggests that NCUs in Algeria have a financial interest in reducing the rate of BSI.

Type
Original Article
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 29 , Issue 11 , November 2008 , pp. 1066 - 1070
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Stoll, BJ, Hansen, N, Fanaroff, AA, et al.Late-onset sepsis in very low birth weight neonates: the experience of the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics 2002;110 (2 pt 1):285–291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Leroyer, A, Bedu, A, Lombrail, P, et al.Prolongation of hospital stay and extra costs due to hospital-acquired infection in a neonatal unit. J Hosp Infect 1997;35:37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Girard, R, Fabry, J, Meynet, R, Lambert, DC, Sepetjan, M. Costs of nosocomial infection in a neonatal unit. J Hosp Infect 1983;4:361–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Mahieu, LM, Buitenweg, N, Beutels, P, De Dooy, JJ. Additional hospital stay and charges due to hospital-acquired infections in a neonatal intensive care unit. J Hosp Infect 2001;47:223–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Van Der Zwet, WC, Kaiser, AM, Van Elburg, RM, et al.Nosocomial infections in a Dutch neonatal intensive care unit: surveillance study with definitions for infection specifically adapted for neonates. J Hosp Infect 2005;61:300–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Couto, RC, Carvalho, EAA, Pedrosa, TMG, Pedroso, ER, Neto, MC, Biscione, FM. A 10-year prospective surveillance of nosocomial infections in neonatal intensive care units. Am J Infect Control 2007;35:183–189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Stover, BH, Shulman, ST, Bratcher, DF, Brady, MT, Levine, GL, Jarvis, WR. Nosocomial infection rates in US children's hospitals' neonatal and pediatric intensive care units. Am J Infect Control 2001;29:152–157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Su, B, Hsieh, H, Chiu, H, Lin, H, Lin, H. Nosocomial infection in a neonatal intensive care unit: a prospective study in Taiwan. Am J Infect Control 2007;35:190–195.Google Scholar
9.Powell, PJ, Powell, CV, Hollis, S, Robinson, MJ. When will my baby go home? Arch Dis Child 1992;67:1214–1216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Garner, JS, Jarvis, WR, Emori, TG, Horan, TC, Hughes, JM. CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988. Am J Infect Control 1988;16:128–140.Google Scholar
11.Haley, R. Cost-benefit analysis of infection control programs. In: Bennett, JV, Brachman, PS, eds. Hospital Infections. 3rd ed. Boston: Lippincott Raven; 1992:249–267.Google Scholar
12.Maxwell, M, Heaney, D, Howie, JG, Noble, S. General practice fundholding: observations on prescribing patterns and costs using the defined daily dose method. BMJ 1993;307:1190–1194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Amsden, GW, Schentag, JJ. Tables of antimicrobial agent pharmacology. In: Mandeli, GL, Bennett, JE, Dolin, R, eds. Principles and Practice of infectious Diseases. 4th ed. New York: Churchill Livingston; 1995:492–528.Google Scholar
14.De Campos Bannwart, D, Rebello, C, Sadeck, LS, Pontes, MD, Araujo Ramos, JL, Leone, CR. Prediction of length of hospital stay in neonatal units for very low birth weight infants. J Perinatol 1999;19:92–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Zernikow, B, Holtmannspotter, K, Michel, E, Hornschuh, F, Groote, K, Hennecke, KH. Predicting length of stay in preterm neonates. Eur J Pediatr 1999;158:59–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Rogowski, J. Measuring the cost of neonatal and perinatal care. Pediatrics 1999;103:329–335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Rosenthal, VD, Guzman, S, Migone, O, Crnich, J. The attributable cost, length of hospital stay, and mortality of central line-associated bloodstream infection in intensive care departments in Argentina: a prospective, matched analysis. Am J Infect Control 2003;31:475–480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Higuera, F, Rangel-Frausto, MS, Rosenthal, VD, et al.Attributable cost and length of hospital stay for patients with central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infection in Mexico City intensive care units: a prospective, matched analysis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007;28:31–35.Google Scholar
19.Soifer, NE, Borzak, S, Edlin, BR, Weinstein, RA. Prevention of peripheral venous catheter complications with an intravenous therapy team: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med 1998;158:473–477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Bregenzer, T, Conen, D, Sakmann, P, Widmer, A. Is routine replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters necessary? Arch Intern Med 1998;158:151–156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Doebbeling, BN, Stanly, GL, Sheetz, CT, et al.Comparative efficacy of alternative hand-washing agents in reducing nosocomial infections in intensive care units. N Engl J Med 1992;327:88–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed