Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T04:04:06.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prevalence and Trend in the Use of Hospital-Based Standing Orders Programs for Influenza and Pneumococcal Vaccination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Sri Ram Pentakota  and
William Halperin
Sri Ram Pentakota
Affiliation:
Department of Quantitative Methods and Epidemiology, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (UMDNJ)–School of Public Health, Newark Campus, New Jersey
William Halperin*
Affiliation:
Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (UMDNJ)–School of Public Health, Newark Campus, New Jersey Department of Quantitative Methods and Epidemiology, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (UMDNJ)–School of Public Health, Newark Campus, New Jersey
*
Medical Sciences Building, F 506, New Jersey Medical School, UMDNJ, 185 South Orange, Newark, New Jersey, 07103-2714 ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background.

In 2002, federal regulations authorized the use of standing orders programs (SOPs) for promoting influenza and pneumococcal vaccination. In 2003, the New Jersey Hospital Association conducted a demonstration project illustrating the efficacy of SOPs, and the state health department informed healthcare facilities of their benefits. We describe the prevalence of reported use of SOPs in New Jersey hospitals in 2003 and 2005 and identify hospital characteristics associated with the use of SOPs.

Methods.

A survey was mailed to the directors of infection control at 117 New Jersey hospitals during the period from January to May 2005 (response rate, 90.6%). Data on hospital characteristics were obtained from hospital directories and online resources.

Results.

The prevalence of use of SOPs for influenza vaccination was 50% (95% confidence interval [CI], 40.1%-59.9%) in 2003, and it increased to 78.3% (95% CI, 69.2%-85.7%) in 2005. The prevalence of SOP use for pneumococcal vaccination was similar. In 2005, the reported rate of use of SOPs for inpatients (influenza vaccination, 76.4%; pneumococcal vaccination, 75.5%) was significantly higher than that for outpatients (influenza vaccination, 9.4%; pneumococcal vaccination, 8.5%). Prevalence ratios for SOP use comparing acute care and non-acute care hospitals were 1.71 (95% CI, 1.2-2.5) for influenza vaccination SOPs and 1.8 for (95% CI, 1.2-2.7) pneumococcal vaccination SOPs. Acute care hospitals with a ratio of admissions to total beds greater than 36.7 reported greater use of SOPs for pneumococcal vaccination, compared with those that had a ratio of less than 36.7.

Conclusion.

The increase in the prevalence of reported use of SOPs among New Jersey hospitals in 2005, compared with 2003, was contemporaneous with SOP-related actions taken by the federal government, the state government, and the New Jersey Hospital Association. Opportunities persist for increased use of SOPs among non-acute care hospitals and for outpatients.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 28 , Issue 8 , August 2007 , pp. 899 - 904
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Influenza and pneumococcal vaccination coverage among persons aged >65 years-United States, 2004-2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2006;55:1065–1068.65+years-United+States,+2004-2005.+MMWR+Morb+Mortal+Wkly+Rep+2006;55:1065–1068.>Google Scholar
2. Sokos, DR. Pharmacists' role in increasing pneumococcal and influenza vaccination. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2005;62:367–377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Shefer, A, McKibben, L, Bardenheier, B, Bratzier, D, Roberts, H. Characteristics of long-term care facilities associated with standing order programs to deliver influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations to residents in 13 states. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2005;6:97–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Jencks, SF, Huff, ED, Cuerdon, T. Change in the quality of care delivered to Medicare beneficiaries, 1998-1999 to 2000-2001. JAMA 2003;289:305–312.Google Scholar
5. Nowalk, MP, Middleton, DB, Zimmerman, RK, Hess, MM, Skledar, SJ, Jacobs, MA. Increasing pneumococcal vaccination rates among hospitalized patients. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2003;24:526–531.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Margolis, KL, Lofgren, RP, Korn, JE. Organizational strategies to improve influenza vaccine delivery: a standing order in a general medicine clinic. Arch Intern Med 1988;148:2205–2207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Fedson, DS, Houck, P, Bratzier, D. Hospital-based influenza and pneumococcal vaccination: Sutton's law applied to prevention. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000;21:692–699.Google Scholar
8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Use of standing orders programs to increase adult vaccination rates: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. MMWR Recomm Rep 2000;49(RR-01):15–26.Google Scholar
9. Coyle, CM, Curie, BP. Improving the rates of inpatient pneumococcal vaccination: impact of standing orders versus computerized reminders to physicians. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2004;25:904–907.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Dexter, PR, Perkins, SM, Maharry, KS, Jones, K, McDonald, CJ. Inpatient computer-based standing orders vs. physician reminders to increase influenza and pneumococcal vaccination rates. JAMA 2004;292:2366–2371.Google Scholar
11. Patricia deHart, M, Salinas, SK, Barnette, LJ, et al. Project Protect: pneumococcal vaccination in Washington state nursing homes. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2005;6:91–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Goebel, LJ, Neitch, SM, Mufson, MA. Standing orders in an ambulatory setting increases influenza vaccine usage in older people. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005;53:1008–1010.Google Scholar
13. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Notice to readers: facilitating influenza and pneumococcal vaccination through standing orders programs. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2003;52:68–69.Google Scholar
14. Profiles of US Hospitals 2000. Baltimore, MD: Solucient, LLC, 1999:423–436.Google Scholar
15. Hospital Blue Book. Atlanta, GA: Billian Publishing, Inc., 2005:717–739.Google Scholar
16. American Hospital Association Guide to the Health Care Field. 2005 ed. Chicago, IL: Healthcare InfoSource, Inc., 2004: A391–A403.Google Scholar
17. New lersey Hospital Association. Directories and New Jersey hospitals lists and map. Available at: http://www.njha.com/directories/. Accessed June 21, 2005.Google Scholar
18. New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services, Division of Health Care Quality and Oversight. Licensed acute care facilities. Available at: http://www.state.nj.us/health/hcsa/hospitalsearch/index.html. Accessed June 21, 2005.Google Scholar
19. USNews.com. Directory of America's hospitals-state-by-state hospital index. Available at: http://www.usnews.com/usnews/health/hospitals/state_dir.htm. Accessed June 21, 2005.Google Scholar
20. Hempstead, K, Bresnitz, E, Howell-White, S, Crabtree, D, Scotto Rosato, N. Use of a state regulation for adult vaccination. Am J Prev Med 2004;26:311–314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Hospital Quality Initiative overview-December 2005. Available at: http://www.cms.hhs.gov/HospitalQualitylnits. Accessed November 29, 2005.Google Scholar
22. US Department of Health and Human Services. Hospital compare. Available at: http://www.hospitalcompare.hhs.gov. Accessed November 29, 2005.Google Scholar
23. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Available at: http://www.jcaho.org. Accessed November 29, 2005.Google Scholar
24. Middleton, DB, Fox, DE, Nowalk, MP, et al. Overcoming barriers to establishing an inpatient vaccination program for pneumococcus using standing orders. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2005;26:874–881.Google Scholar