Hostname: page-component-5f745c7db-q8b2h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-06T16:51:49.806Z Has data issue: true hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Presterilization Microbial Load on Used Medical Devices and the Effectiveness of Hydrogen Peroxide Gas Plasma Against Bacillus Subtilis Spores

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Thereza Christina Vessoni Penna ,
Carlos Augusto M. Ferraz  and
Maria Águida Cassola
Thereza Christina Vessoni Penna*
Affiliation:
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, São Paulo University, São Paulo, Brasil
Carlos Augusto M. Ferraz
Affiliation:
Johnson & Johnson Produtos Profissionais Ltda, São Paulo, Brasil
Maria Águida Cassola
Affiliation:
Johnson & Johnson Produtos Profissionais Ltda, São Paulo, Brasil
*
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, USP-São Paulo University, Rua Antonio de Macedo Soares, 452, São Paulo 04607-000, Brasil
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives:

To determine the microbial load found on used critical medical devices (5 spinal anesthesia needles, 21 catheters, and 28 sheaths) prior to sterilization and to evaluate the effectiveness of hydrogen peroxide gas plasma against inoculated Bacillus subtilis var giobigii (American Type Culture Collection 9372) spores.

Methods:

Membrane filter and pour-plate methods were applied to estimate total microbial loads (aerobic and anaerobic, mesophilic and thermophilic, vegetative and spore forms). Spinal anesthesia needles (102 units) and sheath components (61 units) were inoculated with a suspension of B subtilis spores. After drying, the devices were sterilized with hydrogen peroxide gas plasma.

Results:

Higher counts of aerobic, mesophilic, and fungal organisms were recovered when the drying period was insufficient. Anaerobic spores were not found in any analyzed presterilization items. The hydrogen peroxide gas plasma effected a 5 to 7 log10-fold reduction in B subtilis spore counts in well-dried needles and sheath components.

Conclusions:

The success of hydrogen peroxide gas plasma sterilization depends mostly on educating the staff to assure well-cleaned and dried reusable medical devices, allowing penetration of the hydrogen peroxide gas plasma into the critical points of the items and providing a reduction in organisms.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 20 , Issue 7 , July 1999 , pp. 465 - 472
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Rutala, WA, Disinfection and sterilization of patient-care items. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1996;17:377–384.Google Scholar
2.Bentolita, P, Jacob, R, Roberge, F. Effects of re-use on the physical characteristics of angiographic catheters. J Med Eng Technol 1990;4:254–259.Google Scholar
3.Jacobson, JA, Schwartz, CE, Marshall, HW, Conti, M, Burke, JR. Fever, chills and hypotension following cardiac catheterization with single- and multiple-use disposable catheters. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1983;9:39–46.Google Scholar
4.Ravin, CE, Koehler, PR. Reuse of disposable catheters and guide wires. Radiology 1977;122:577–579.Google Scholar
5.Booth, AF. The manufacturer's role in safe reuse. Medical Device & Diagnostic Industry 1997;87:127–134.Google Scholar
6.Collignon, PJ, Graham, E, Dreimanis, DE. Reuse in sterile sites of single-use medical devices: how common is this in Australia? Med J Aust 1996;164:533–536.Google Scholar
7.Comis, J. Reusing Single-Use Cardiac Catheters. Dimensions 1991;October: 32–34.Google Scholar
8.Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. Design, Testing, and Labeling Reusable Medical Devices for Reprocessing in Health Care Facilities: A Guide for Device Manufacturers. Report no. 12. Arlington, VA: AAMI; 1995.Google Scholar
9.Morrissey, RF. Bioburden: a rational approach. In: Gaughran, ERL, Morrissey, RF, eds. Sterilization of Medical Products, vol. II. 2nd ed. Montreal, Quebec, Canada: Multiscience Publications; 1981:11–33.Google Scholar
10.Morrissey, RF, Phillips, CB. Sterilization Technology: A Practical Guide for Manufacturers and Users of Health Care Products. New York, NY: VanNostrad Reinhold; 1993:518.Google Scholar
11.American Public Health Association. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 19th ed. Washington, DC: APHA 1995:9-31, 9–38.Google Scholar
12.United States Pharmacopeia. 23rd ed. Rockville, MD: United States Pharmacopeial Convention; 1995:1847-1849,1976-1981.Google Scholar
13.Penna, TC, Machoshvili, IA, Taqueda, ME. Thermal resistance of Bacillus stearothermophilus spores on strips previously treated with calcium. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol 1996;50:227–237.Google ScholarPubMed
14.Ferraz, CA, STERRAD opte pelo futuro. Enfogue 1995;21:12–15.Google Scholar
15.Cassola, MA, Ishsaki, E, Ferraz, CA, Vessoni Penna, TC. Esterilização de artigos médico hospitalares por plasma de peróxido de hidrogênio. Laes & Haes 1997;19:88–100.Google Scholar
16.Alfa, MJ. Plasma-based sterilization. The challenge of narrow lumens. Infection Control & Sterilization Technology 1996;19–24.Google Scholar
17.Alfa, MJ, Sitter, DL. In-hospital evaluation of orthophthaladehyde as a high-level disinfectant for flexible endoscopes. J Hosp Infect 1994; 26:15–56.Google Scholar
18.Alfa, MJ, DeGagne, P, Olson, N, Puchalski, T. Comparison of ion plasma, vaporized hydrogen peroxide, and 100% ethylene oxide sterilizers to the 12/88 ethylene oxide gas sterilizer. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1996;17:92–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar