Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:53:23.144Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Predictive Factors for the Development of Central Line–Associated Bloodstream Infection Due to Gram-Negative Bacteria in Intensive Care Unit Patients After Surgery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Pranavi V. Sreeramoju ,
Jocelyn Tolentino ,
Sylvia Garcia-Houchins  and
Stephen G. Weber
Pranavi V. Sreeramoju*
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine-Infectious Diseases, University of Chicago, Illinois Department of Medicine-Infectious Diseases, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio
Jocelyn Tolentino
Affiliation:
Department of Infection Control, Medical Center, University of Chicago, Illinois
Sylvia Garcia-Houchins
Affiliation:
Department of Infection Control, Medical Center, University of Chicago, Illinois
Stephen G. Weber
Affiliation:
Department of Infection Control, Medical Center, University of Chicago, Illinois Department of Medicine-Infectious Diseases, University of Chicago, Illinois
*
7703 Floyd Curl Drive, MC 7881, San Antonio, TX 78229 ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives.

To examine the relative proportions of central line-associated bloodstream infection (BSI) due to gram-negative bacteria and due to gram-positive bacteria among patients who had undergone surgery and patients who had not. The study also evaluated clinical predictive factors and unadjusted outcomes associated with central line-associated BSI caused by gram-negative bacteria in the postoperative period.

Design.

Observational, case-control study based on a retrospective review of medical records.

Setting.

University of Chicago Medical Center, a 500-bed tertiary care center located on Chicago's south side.

Patients.

Adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients who developed central line-associated BSI.

Results.

There were a total of 142 adult patients who met the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance System definition for central line-associated BSI. Of those, 66 patients (46.5%) had infections due to gram-positive bacteria, 49 patients (34.5%) had infections due to gram-negative bacteria, 23 patients (16.2%) had infections due to yeast, and 4 patients (2.8%) had mixed infections. Patients who underwent surgery were more likely to develop central line-associated BSI due to gram-negative bacteria within 28 days of the surgery, compared with patients who had not had surgery recently (57.6% vs 27.3%; P = .002). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, diabetes mellitus (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 4.6 [95% CI, 1.2-18.1]; P = .03) and the presence of hypotension at the time of the first blood culture positive for a pathogen (adjusted OR, 9.8 [95% CI, 2.5-39.1]; P = .001 ) were found to be independently predictive of central line-associated BSI caused by gram-negative bacteria. Unadjusted outcomes were not different in the group with BSI due to gram-negative pathogens, compared to the group with BSI due to gram-positive pathogens.

Conclusions.

Clinicians caring for critically ill patients after surgery should be especially concerned about the possibility of central line-associated BSI caused by gram-negative pathogens. The presence of diabetes and hypotension appear to be significant associated factors.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , January 2008 , pp. 51 - 56
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Albrecht, SJ. Reemergence of gram-negative health care-associated bloodstream infections. Arch Intern Med 2006;166:1289–1294.Google Scholar
2.Wisplinghoff, H, Bischoff, T, Tallent, SM, Seifert, H, Wenzel, RP, Edmond, MB. Nosocomial bloodstream infections in US hospitals: analysis of 24,179 cases from a prospective nationwide surveillance study. Clin Infect Dis 2004;39:309–317.Google Scholar
3.Miller, PJ, Farr, BM. Morbidity and mortality associated with multiple episodes of nosocomial bloodstream infection: a cohort study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1989;10:216–219.Google Scholar
4.Dimick, JB, Pelz, RK, Consunji, R, Swoboda, SM, Hendrix, CW, Lipsett, PA. Increased resource use associated with catheter-related bloodstream infection in the surgical intensive care unit. Arch Surg 2001;136:229–234.Google Scholar
5.Harbarth, S, Fernere, K, Hugonnet, S, Ricou, B, Suter, P, Pittet, D. Epidemiology and prognostic determinants of bloodstream infections in surgical intensive care. Arch Surg 2002;137:1353–1359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Ryan, T, Mc Carthy, JF, Rady, MY, et al.Early bloodstream infection after cardiopulmonary bypass: frequency rate, risk factors, and implications. Crit Care Med 1997;25:2009–2014.Google Scholar
7.Velasco, E, Soares, M, Byington, R, et al.Prospective evaluation of the epidemiology, microbiology, and outcome of bloodstream infections in adult surgical cancer Patients. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2004;23:596–602.Google Scholar
8.Levy, I, Ovadia, B, Erez, E, et al.Nosocomial infections after cardiac surgery in infants and children: incidence and risk factors. J Hosp Infect 2003;53:111–116.Google Scholar
9.Garner, JS. CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988. Am J Infect Control 1988;16:128–140.Google Scholar
10.Murray, PR, Baron, EJ, Jorgensen, JH. Manual of Clinical Microbiology. 8th ed. Washington DC: American Society for Microbiology Press; 2003.Google Scholar
11.Bactec Fluorescent Series Users Manual. Document Number MA- 0074. Sparks, MD: BD Biosciences; 2001.Google Scholar
12.Flynn, DM, Weinstein, RA, Nathan, C, Gaston, MA, Kabins, SA. Patients' endogenous flora as the source of “nosocomial’ Enterobacter in cardiac surgery. J Infect Dis 1987;156:363–368.Google Scholar
13.Bernardini, J, Bender, F, Florio, T, et al.Randomized, double-blind trial of antibiotic exit site cream for prevention of exit site infection in peritoneal dialysis Patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 2005;16:539–545.Google Scholar
14.Mengistu, Y, Erge, W, Bellete, B. In vitro susceptibility of gram-negative bacterial isolates to Chlorhexidine gluconate. East Afr Med J 1999;76:243–246.Google Scholar
15.Pérez-Fontán, M, Rodríguez-Carmona, A, Rosales, M, García-Falcón, T, Valdés, F. Incidence and clinical significance of nasal and pericatheter colonization by gram-negative bacteria among patients undergoing chronic peritoneal dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2002;17:118–122.Google Scholar
16.Stickler, DJ. Susceptibility of antibiotic-resistant gram-negative bacteria to biocides: a perspective from the study of catheter biofilms. J Appi Microbiol 2002;92(suppl):163S–170S.Google Scholar
17.Thomsen, RW, Hundborg, HH, Lervang, HH, Johnsen, SP, Schonheyder, HC, Sorensen, HT. Diabetes mellitus as a risk and prognostic factor for community-acquired bacteremia due to enterobacteria: a 10-year, population-based study among adults. Clin Infect Dis 2005;40:628–631.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Panhotra, BR, Saxena, AK, Al-Ghamdi, AM. Extended-spectrum β-lac-tamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae hospital acquired bacteremia: risk factors and clinical outcome. Saudi Med J 2004;25:1871–1876.Google Scholar
19.Mackowiak, PA. Pharyngeal colonization by gram-negative bacilli in aspiration-prone persons. Arch Intern Med 1978;138:1224–1227.Google Scholar
20.Cusack, PB. Bacteraemia with hypotension due to gram-negative bacilli. Lancet 1965;1:495.Google Scholar
21.McArdle, CS, MacDonald, JA, Ledingham, IM. A three year retrospective analysis of septic shock in a general hospital. Scott Med J 1975;20:79–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Aldridge, RT. Gram-negative bacteremia with sudden hypotension. Lancet 1960;2:76–77.Google Scholar
23.Watts, FB. Myocardial infarction, gram-negative bacteremia, prolonged shock, and leukemoid reaction. Am Heart J 1965;69:253–257.Google Scholar
24.von Eiff, C. Pathogenesis of infections due to coagulase-negative staphylococci. Lancet Infect Dis 2002;2:677–685.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.Huebner, J. Coagulase-negative staphylococci: role as pathogens. Ann Rev Med 1999;50:223–236.Google Scholar