Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:35:31.577Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Postdischarge Surgical Site Infection Surveillance Practices in Washington Acute Care Hospitals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Roxie Zarate  and
David Birnbaum
Roxie Zarate*
Affiliation:
Washington State Department of Health, Olympia, Washington
David Birnbaum
Affiliation:
Washington State Department of Health, Olympia, Washington
*
Washington State Department of Health, Healthcare-Associated Infection Program, P.O. Box 47811, Olympia, WA 98504-7811 ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Little is known about postdischarge surveillance practices currently in place among American hospitals. This survey describes practices used by acute care hospitals covered by Washington State's legislated mandate for public reporting of surgical site infections. While the vast majority of facilities use multiple techniques, wide variation in practices was discovered.

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2012;33(1):8

Type
Concise Communications
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 33 , Issue 1 , January 2012 , pp. 87 - 89
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Avato, JL, Lai, KK. Impact of postdischarge surveillance on surgical-site infection rates for coronary artery bypass procedures. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002;23:364–367.Google Scholar
2. Brown, RB, Bradley, S, Opitz, E, Cipriani, D, Pieczarka, R, Sands, M. Surgical wound infections documented after hospital discharge. Am J Infect Control 1987;15(2):54–58.Google Scholar
3. Burns, SJ, Dippe, SE. Postoperative wound infections detected during hospitalization and after discharge in a community hospital. Am J Infect Control 1982;10(2):60–65.Google Scholar
4. Fields, C. Outcomes of a postdischarge surveillance system for surgical site infections at a Midwestern regional referral center hospital. Am J Infect Control 1999;27:158–164.Google Scholar
5. Huegner, F, Schmachtenberg, A, Haefner, H, et al. Evaluation of postdischarge surveillance of surgical site infections after total hip and knee arthroplasty. Am J Prev Med 2005;33:455–462.Google Scholar
6. Mannien, J, Wille, J, Snoeren, R, van der Hoef, S. Impact of postdischarge surveillance on surgical site infection rates for several surgical procedures: results from the nosocomial surveillance network in the Netherlands. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006;27:809–816.Google Scholar
7. Medina-Cuadros, M, Sillero-Arenas, M, Martinez-Gallego, G, Delagado-Rodriguez, M. Surgical wound infections diagnosed after discharge from hospital: epidemiologic differences with in-hospital infections. Am J Infect Control 1996;24:421–428.Google Scholar
8. Weigelt, J, Dryer, D, Haley, R. The necessity and efficiency of wound surveillance after discharge. Arch Surg 1992;127:77–82.Google Scholar
9. Mitchell, DH, Swift, G, Gilbert, GL. Surgical wound infection surveillance: the importance of infections that develop after hospital discharge. Aust N Z J Surg 1999;69:117–120.Google Scholar
10. Prospero, E, Cavicchi, A, Bacelli, S, Barbadoro, P, Tantucci, L, D'Errico, MM. Surveillance for surgical site infection after hospital discharge: a surgical procedure-specific perspective. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006;27:1313–1317.Google Scholar
11. Sands, K, Vineyard, G, Piatt, R. Surgical site infections occurring after hospital discharge. J Infect Dis 1996;173:963–970.Google Scholar
12. Haley, RW. The scientific basis for using surveillance and risk factor data to reduce nosocomial infection rates. J Hosp Infect 1995;30:3–14.Google Scholar
13. Petherick, ES, Dalton, JE, Moore, PJ, Cullum, N. Methods for identifying surgical wound identification after discharge from hospital: a systematic review. BMC Infect Dis 2006;6:170.Google Scholar
14. Washington State Legislature, Advisory Committee. Health care-associated infection: data collection and reporting: rules. RCW 43.70.056. http://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=43.70.056. Accessed March 16, 2011.Google Scholar
15. Johnson, RA, Wichern, DW. Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1988.Google Scholar
16. Whitby, M, McLaws, ML, Collopy, B, et al. Post-discharge surveillance: can patients reliably diagnose surgical wound infections? J Hosp Infect 2002;52(3):155–160.Google Scholar
17. Whitby, M, McLaws, ML, Doidge, S, Collopy, B. Post-discharge surgical site surveillance: does patient education improve reliability of diagnosis? J Hosp Infect 2007;66:237–242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Manian, F, Meyer, L. Adjunctive use of monthly physician questionnaires for surveillance of surgical site infections after hospital discharge and in ambulatory surgical patients: report of a sevenyear experience. Am J Infect Control 1997;25:390–394.Google Scholar
19. Freidman, C, Strum, L, Chenoweth, C. Electronic chart review as an aid to postdischarge surgical site infection surveillance: increased case finding. Am J Infect Control 2001;29:329–323.Google Scholar
20. Sands, K, Vineyard, G, Livingston, J, Christiansen, C, Piatt, R. Efficient identification of postdischarge surgical site infections: use of automated pharmacy dispensing information, administrative data, and medical record information. J Infect Dis 1999;179(2):434–441.Google Scholar
21. Sands, KE, Yokoe, DS, Hooper, DC, et al. Detection of postoperative surgical-site infections: comparison of health plan-based surveillance with hospital based programs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2003;24:741–743.Google Scholar
22. Piatt, R, Yokoe, DS, Sands, KE; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Eastern Massachusetts Prevention Epicenter Investigators. Automated methods for surveillance of surgical site infections. Emerg Infect Dis 2001;7:212–216.Google Scholar
23. Council for State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE). Interim position statement: prioritizing electronic reporting of healthcare-associated infection data. http://www.cste.org/ps2010/CSTE2011InterimKainer.pdf. Accessed March 17, 2001.Google Scholar