Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T11:44:42.900Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nosocomial Salmonellosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

C.S. Weikel
Affiliation:
Division of Geographie Medicine, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia
R.L. Guerrant*
Affiliation:
Division of Geographie Medicine, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia
*
University of Virginia, Division of Geographic Medicine, Room 3915, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville. VA 22908
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1985

References

1.Baine, WB, Gangarosa, EJ, Bennett, JV, et al: Institutional salmonellosis. J Infect Dis 1973; 128:357360.Google Scholar
2.Holmberg, SD, Wells, JG, Cohen, ML: Animal-to-man transmission of antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella: Investigations of US outbreaks, 1971-1983. Science 1984; 225:833835.Google Scholar
3.Stamm, WE, Weinstein, RA, Dixon, RE: Comparison of endemic and epidemic nosocomial infections. Am J Med 1981; 70:393397.Google Scholar
4.Blaser, MJ, Newman, LS: A review of human salmonellosis: I. Infective Dose. Rev Infect Dis 1982; 4:1096-6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Taylor, DN, Bied, JM, Munro, JS, et al: Salmonella dublin infections in the United States, 1979-1980. J Infect Dis 1982; 146:322327.Google Scholar
6.Buchwald, DS, Blaser, MU: A review of human salmonellosis: II. Duration of excretion following infection with nontyphi Salmonella. Rev Infect Dis 1984; 6:345356.Google Scholar
7.Haley, CE, Guerrant, RL: Institutional salmonellosis. Asepsis 1982; 4:712.Google Scholar
8.Chattopadhyay, B, Pilfold, JN: The effect of prolonged incubation of selenite F broth on the rate of isolation of Salmonella from feces. Med Lab Sci 1976; 33:191194.Google Scholar
9.McCall, CE, Martin, WT, Boring, JR: Efficiency of cultures of rectal swabs and faecal specimens in detecting Salmonella carriers: Correlation with numbers of Salmonellas excreted. J Hyg(Lond) 1966; 64:261269.Google Scholar
10.Musher, DM, Rubenstein, AD: Permanent carriers of nontyphosa salmonellae. Arch Intern Med 1973; 132:869869.Google Scholar
11.Nye, FJ: Do antibiotics really prolong salmonella excretion? Anti-microb Chemother 1981;7;215216.Google Scholar
12.Aserkoff, B, Bennett, JV: Effect of antibiotic therapy in acute salmonellosis in the fecal excretion of salmonellae. N Engl J Med 1969; 281:636640.Google Scholar
13.Joint Project by members of the association for the study of infectious disease. Effect of neomycin in non-invasive Salmonella infections of the gastrointestinal tract. Lancet 1970; 2:11591161.Google Scholar
14.Holmberg, SD, Osterholm, MT, Senger, KA, et al: Drug-resistant salmonella from animals fed antimicrobials. N Engl J Med 1984; 311:617622.Google Scholar
15.Riley, LW, Cohen, ML, Seals, JE, et al: Importance of host factors in human salmonellosis caused by multiresistant strains of Salmonella. J Infect Dis 1984; 149:878883.Google Scholar
16.Clementi, KJ: Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in the treatment of carriers of Salmonella. J Infect Dis 1973;128(Suppl):S738S742.Google Scholar
17.A comparison of the combination Pivmecillinam/pivampicillin and co-trimoxazole in the treatment of convalescent carriers of Salmonella and Shigella. Scand J Infect Dis 1984; 16:99102.Google Scholar
18.Jick, H: Adverse reactions to Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in hospitalized patients. Rev Infect Dis 1982; 4:4265-28.Google Scholar
19.Cohen, ML, Fontaine, RE, Pollard, RA, et al: An assessment of patient-related economic costs in an outbreak of salmonellosis. N Engl J Med 1980; 299:459460.Google Scholar
20.Levy, BS: The economic impact of a food-borne salmonellosis outbreak. JAMA 1974; 230:12811282.Google Scholar