Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T22:36:56.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nosocomial Infections in Surgical Patients in the United States, January 1986-June 1992

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Teresa C. Horan ,
David H. Culver ,
Robert P. Gaynes ,
William R. Jarvis ,
Jonathan R. Edwards ,
Casetta R. Reid  and
National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System
Teresa C. Horan*
Affiliation:
Hospital Infections Bogram, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Public Health Service, Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, Georgia
David H. Culver
Affiliation:
Hospital Infections Bogram, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Public Health Service, Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, Georgia
Robert P. Gaynes
Affiliation:
Hospital Infections Bogram, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Public Health Service, Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, Georgia
William R. Jarvis
Affiliation:
Hospital Infections Bogram, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Public Health Service, Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, Georgia
Jonathan R. Edwards
Affiliation:
Hospital Infections Bogram, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Public Health Service, Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, Georgia
Casetta R. Reid
Affiliation:
Hospital Infections Bogram, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Public Health Service, Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, Georgia
National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System
Affiliation:
Hospital Infections Bogram, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Public Health Service, Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, Georgia
*
Hospital Infections Program, Mailstop A07, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives:

To describe the distribution of nosocomial infections among surgical patients by site of infection for different types of operations, and to show how the risk of certain adverse outcomes associated with nosocomial infection varied by site, type of operation, and exposure to specific medical devices.

Design:

Surveillance of surgical patients during January 1986-June 1992 using standard definitions and protocols for both comprehensive (all sites, all operations) and targeted (all sites, selected operations) infection detection.

Setting and Patients:

Acute care US hospitals participating in the National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance (NNIS) System: 42,509 patients with 52,388 infections from 95 hospitals using comprehensive surveillance protocols and an additional 5,659 patients with 6,963 infections from 11 more hospitals using a targeted protocol.

Results:

Surgical site infection was the most common nosocomial infection site (37%) when data were reported by hospitals using the comprehensive protocols. When infections reported from both types of protocols were stratified by type of operation, other sites were most frequent following certain operations (e.g., urinary tract infection after joint prosthesis surgery [52%]). Among the infected surgical patients who died, the probability that an infection was related to the patient's death varied significantly with the site of infection, from 22% for urinary tract infection to 89% for organ/space surgical site infection, but was independent of the type of operation performed. The probability of developing a secondary bloodstream infection also varied significantly with the primary site of infection, from 3.1% for incisional surgical site infection to 9.5% for organ/space surgical site infection (p<.001). For all infections except pneumonia, the risk of developing a secondary bloodstream infection also varied significantly with the type of operation performed (p<.00l) and was generally highest for cardiac surgery and lowest for abdominal hysterectomy. Surgical patients who developed ventilator-associated pneumonia were more than twice as likely to develop a secondary bloodstream infection as nonventilated pneumonia patients (8.1% versus 3.3%, p<.001).

Conclusions:

For surgical patients with nosocomial infection, the distribution of nosocomial infections by site varies by type of operation, the frequency with which nosocomial infections contribute to patient mortality varies by site of infection but not by type of operation, and the risk of developing a secondary bloodstream infection varies by type of primary infection and, except for pneumonia, by type of operation.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , February 1993 , pp. 73 - 80
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Graves, EJ. National hospital discharge survey: annual summary, 1987. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Stat. 1989;13:11.Google Scholar
2. Cruse, PJE, Foord, R. A five-year prospective study of 23,649 surgical wounds. Arch Surg. 1973;107:206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Farber, BE Wenzel, RP Postoperative wound infection rates: results of prospective statewide surveillance. Am J Surg. 1980;140:343–346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Condon, RE, Schulte, WJ, Malangoni, MA, Anderson-Teschendorf, MJ. Effectiveness of a surgical wound surveillance program. Arch Surg. 1983;118:303–307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Olson, MM, Lee, JT Jr. Continuous, 10-year wound infection surveillance: results, advantages, and unanswered questions. Arch Surg. 1990;125:794–803.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Emori, TG, Culver, DH, Horan, TC, et al. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System (NNIS): description of surveillance methodology. Am J Infect Control. 1991;19:19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Garner, JS, Jarvis, WR, Emori, TG, Horan, TC, Hughes, JM. CDC definitions for nosocomiai infections, 1988. Am J Infect Control. 1988;16:128–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Horan, TC, Gaynes, RP, Martone, WJ, Jarvis, WR, Emori, TG. CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1992;13:606–608.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Yonekura, ML. Prevention of postcesarean febrile morbidity. In: Wenzel, RP, ed. Prevention and Control of Nosocomial infections. Baltimore, Md: Williams and Wilkins; 1987:541–559.Google Scholar
10. Penin, GB, Ehrenkranz, NJ. Priorities for surveillance and cost-effective control of postoperative infection. Arch Surg. 1988;123:1305–1308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Simmons, BP Wong, ES. Guideline for prevention of nosocomial pneumonia. Infect Control. 1982;3:327–333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Driks, MR, Craven, DE, Celli, BR, et al. Nosocomial pneumonia in intubated patients given sucralfate as compared with antacids or histamine type 2 blockers. N Engl J Med. 1987;317:1376–1382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Cruse, PJE, Foord, R The epidemiology of wound infections: a 10-year prospective study of 62,939 wounds. Surg Clin North Am. 1980;60:27–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Lennard, ES, Hargiss, CO, Schoenknecht, FD. Postoperative wound infection surveillance by use of bacterial contamination categories. Am /Infect Control. 1985;13:147–153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Haley, RW, Culver, DH, White, JW, et al. The efficacy of infection surveillance and control programs in preventing nosocomial infections in U.S. hospitals. Am J Epidemiol. 1985;121:182–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Haley, RW, Culver, DH, Morgan, WM, White, JW, Emori, TG, Hooton, TM. Identifying patients at high risk of surgical wound infection: a simple multivariate index of patient susceptibility and wound contamination. Am J Epidemiol. 1985;121:206–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Mead, PB, Pories, SE, Hall, P, Vacek, PM, Davis, JH, Gamelli, RL. Decreasing the incidence of surgical wound infections: validation of a surveillance-notification program. Arch Surg. 1986;121:458–461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Collier, C, Miller, DP, Borst, M. Community hospital surgeon-specific infection rates. Infect Control. 1987;8:249–254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Gil-Egea, MJ, Pi-Sunyer, MT Verdaguer, A, Sanz, F, Sitges-Serra, A, Eleizegui, LT. Surgical wound infections: prospective study of 4,468 clean wounds. infect Control. 1987;8:277–280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Culver, DH, Horan, TC, Gaynes, RP, et al. Surgical wound infection rates by wound class, operative procedure, and patient risk index. Am J Med. 1991;19(suppl 3B):152S–157S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Nosocomial infection rates for interhospital comparison: limitations and possible solutions. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1991;12:609–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar