Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T17:15:25.730Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New ASTM Barrier Test Methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Nathan L. Belkin
Nathan L. Belkin*
Affiliation:
Clearwater. Florida
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Departments
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 14 , Issue 10 , October 1993 , pp. 561 - 562
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1993 

References

1. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Occupational exposure to bloodbome pathogens, final rule. Federal Register 1991;56:64177,(d)(3)(i).Google Scholar
2. Crow, S. Emperor's clothing for the contemporary healthcare worker. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1991;12:308–310.10.1086/646344CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Shadduck, PF, Tyler, DS, Lyerly, HK, et al. Commercially available surgical gowns do not prevent penetration by HIV-1. Surgical Forum 1990;41:77–80.Google Scholar
4. Smith, JS, Nichols, RJ. Barrier efficacy of surgical gowns. Arch Surg 1991;126:756–763.10.1001/archsurg.1991.01410300102016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Quebbeman, EJ, Telford, GL, Hubbard, S, et al. In-use evaluation of surgical gowns. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1992;174:369–375.Google ScholarPubMed
6. Laufman, H, Eudy, WW, Vandermoot, BA, Liu, D, Harris, CA. Strike-through of moist contamination by woven and non-woven surgical materials. Ann Surg 1975;181:857–862.10.1097/00000658-197506000-00018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. American Society for Testing Materials. ES 21 and ES 22 Test Methods. Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testing Materials, Nov. 1992.Google Scholar
8. Altman, KW, McElhaney, JH, Moylan, JA, Fitzpatrick, KT. Transmural surgical gown pressure measurements in the operating theater. Am J Infect Control 1991;19:147–155.10.1016/0196-6553(91)90021-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Bernard, HR, Beck, WC. Operating room barriers-idealism, practicality and the future. Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons 1975;60:16.Google ScholarPubMed
10. Smith, JW, Nichols, RL. Barriers: resistance of protective clothing materials to synthetic blood. OR Reports 1993;2–5.Google Scholar
11. Decker, MD. The OSHA bloodborne hazard standard. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1992;13:407–417.10.2307/30147150CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Hedrick, E. Buyer beware! Am J Infect Control 1992;20:170–171.10.1016/S0196-6553(05)80141-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Telford, GL, Quebbeman, EJ. Invited commentary. Arch Surg 1991;126:763.Google Scholar
14. Schwartz, JT, Saunders, DE. Microbial penetration of surgical gown materials. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1980;150:507–512.Google ScholarPubMed