Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:12:56.138Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New Approaches to Decontamination of Rooms After Patients Are Discharged

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

John M. Boyce
John M. Boyce*
Affiliation:
Hospital of Saint Raphael and Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
*
Infectious Diseases Section, Hospital of Saint Raphael, 1450 Chapel St, New Haven, CT 06511 ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentary
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 30 , Issue 6 , June 2009 , pp. 515 - 517
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Center for Disease Control. Disinfectant fogging, an ineffective measure. NNIS report 1971 (third quarter). DHEW Publication No. CDC 72-8149. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office, 1972.Google Scholar
2.Hayden, MK, Bonten, MJ, Blom, DW, Lyle, EA, van de Vijver, DA, Weinstein, RA. Reduction in acquisition of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus after enforcement of routine environmental cleaning measures. Clin Infect Dis 2006;42:1552–1560.Google Scholar
3.Huang, SS, Datta, R, Platt, R. Risk of acquiring antibiotic-resistant bacteria from prior room occupants. Arch Intern Med 2006;166:1945–1951.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Drees, M, Snydman, DR, Schmid, CH, et al.Prior environmental contamination increases the risk of acquisition of vancomycin-resistant en-terococci. Clin Infect Dis 2008;46:678–685.Google Scholar
5.Carling, PC, Briggs, JL, Perkins, J, Highlander, D. Improved cleaning of patient rooms using a new targeting method. Clin Infect Dis 2006;42:385–388.Google Scholar
6.Goodman, ER, Platt, R, Bass, R, Onderdon, AB, Yokoe, DS, Huang, SS. Impact of an environmental cleaning intervention on the presence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci on surfaces in intensive care unit rooms. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;29:593–599.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.McAnoy, AM. Vaporous decontamination methods: potential uses and research priorities for chemical and biological contamination control. DSTO-GD-0465. Victoria, Australia: Human Protection and Performance Division, Defence Science and Technology Organisation, 2006:1–13. Available at: http://dspace.dsto.defence.gov.au/dspace/bitstream/1947/3415/l/DSTO-GD-0465%20PR.pdf. Accessed April 14, 2009.Google Scholar
8.Fisher, J, Caputo, RA. Comparing and contrasting barrier isolator decontamination systems. Pharm Technol 2004;24:68–82. Available at: http://pharmtech.findpharma.com/pharmtech/da ta/articlestandard//pharmtech/452004/132395/article.pdf. Accessed April 14, 2009.Google Scholar
9.Fichet, G, Antioga, K, Comoy, E, Deslys, JP, McDonnell, G. Prion inactivation using a new gaseous hydrogen peroxide sterilisation process. J Hosp Infect 2007;67:278–286.Google Scholar
10.French, GL, Otter, JA, Shannon, KP, Adams, NMT, Watling, D, Parks, MJ. Tackling contamination of the hospital environment by methicillin-re-sistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): a comparison between conventional terminal cleaning and hydrogen peroxide vapour decontamination. ; Hosp Infect 2004;57:31–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Boyce, JM, Havill, NL, Otter, JA, et al.Impact of hydrogen peroxide vapor room decontamination on Clostridium difficile environmental contamination and transmission in a healthcare Setting. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;29:723–729.Google Scholar
12.Otter, JA, French, GL. Survival of nosocomial bacteria and spores on surfaces and inactivation by hydrogen peroxide vapour (HPV). J Clin Microbiol 2009;47:205–207.Google Scholar
13.Passaretti, C, Otter, JA, Lipsett, P, et al.Adherence to hydrogen peroxide vapor (HPV) decontamination reduces VRE acquisition in high-risk units. In: Program and abstracts of the 48th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; October 25-28, 2008; Washington, DC (abstract K-4214b). Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology Press: 327.Google Scholar
14.Barbut, F, Menuet, D, Verachten, M, Girou, E. Comparison of the efficacy of a hydrogen peroxide dry-mist disinfection system and sodium hypochlorite solution for eradication of Clostridium difficile spores. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2009;30:507–514 (in this issue).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Shapey, S, Machin, K, Levi, K, Boswell, TC. Activity of a dry mist hydrogen peroxide system against environmental Clostridium difficile contamination in elderly care wards. J Hosp Infect 2008;70:136–141.Google Scholar
16.Andersen, BM, Rasch, M, Hochlin, K, Jensen, FH, Wismar, P, Fredriksen, JE. Decontamination of rooms, medical equipment and ambulances using an aerosol of hydrogen peroxide disinfectant. J Hosp Infect 2006;62:149–155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.de Boer, HEL, van Elzelingen-Dekker, CM, van Rheenen-Verberg, CMF, Spanjaard, L. Use of gaseous ozone for eradication of mefhicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from the home environment of a colonized hospital employee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006;27:1120–1122.Google Scholar