Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T08:39:20.381Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Cholangitis After Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: Failure of Routine Endoscope Cultures to Prevent an Outbreak

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Thomas G. Fraser ,
Sandra Reiner ,
Michael Malczynski ,
Paul R. Yarnold ,
John Warren  and
Gary A. Noskin
Thomas G. Fraser*
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious Diseases, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
Sandra Reiner
Affiliation:
Department of Infection Control and Prevention, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois
Michael Malczynski
Affiliation:
Molecular Epidemiology Laboratory, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois
Paul R. Yarnold
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, Division of Emergency Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
John Warren
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology, Division of Infectious Diseases, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois Molecular Epidemiology Laboratory, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois
Gary A. Noskin
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois Department of Infection Control and Prevention, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois
*
Department of Infectious Diseases/S32, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

Nosocomial infections due to medical devices are of increasing concern to infection control practitioners. Attempts to prevent such infections have included surveillance cultures of endoscopes and bronchoscopes. In July 2002, the infectious disease consultation service was asked to see three patients with sepsis due to multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).

Objective:

To describe an outbreak of multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa sepsis after ERCP at an institution that performs routine surveillance cultures of endoscopes.

Design:

A traditional outbreak investigation supplemented by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was undertaken, including a case-control analysis based on the hypothesis that all infected individuals had their ERCP performed with the same endoscope.

Setting:

A tertiary-care academic medical center.

Results:

The case-control analysis confirmed the hypothesis that undergoing ERCP with the implicated endoscope was associated with a culture positive for Pseudomonas (P = .01). The available strains were identical by PFGE. This outbreak occurred despite a negative surveillance culture of the implicated endoscope 1 month earlier.

Conclusions:

Infectious morbidity can occur after endoscopy despite negative surveillance cultures. The practice of routine endoscope cultures does not prevent device-related infectious morbidity.

Type
Orginal Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 25 , Issue 10 , October 2004 , pp. 856 - 859
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2004 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Low, DE, Micflikier, AB, Kennedy, JK, Stiver, HG. Infectious complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a prospective assessment. Arch Intern Med 1980;140:1076–1077.10.1001/archinte.1980.00330190088026Google Scholar
2. Doherty, DE, Falko, JM, Lefkovitz, N, Rogers, J, Fromkes, J. Pseudomonas aeruginosa sepsis following retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Dig Dis Sci 1982;27:169–170.10.1007/BF01311712Google Scholar
3. Allen, JI, Allen, MO, Olson, MM, et al. Pseudomonas infection of the biliary system resulting from use of a contaminated endoscope. Gastroenterology 1987;92:759–763.10.1016/0016-5085(87)90029-1Google Scholar
4. Earnshaw, JJ, Clark, AW, Thom, BT. Outbreak of Pseudomonas aeruginosa following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. J Hosp Infect 1985;6:95–97.10.1016/S0195-6701(85)80024-4Google Scholar
5. Classen, DC, Jacobson, JA, Burke, JP, Jacobson, JT, Evans, RS. Serious Pseudomonas infections associated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Am J Med 1988;84:590–596.10.1016/0002-9343(88)90141-6Google Scholar
6. Alvarado, CJ, Stolz, SM, Maki, DG. Nosocomial infections from contaminated endoscopes: a flawed automated endoscope washer. An investigation using molecular epidemiology. Am J Med 1991;91(suppl 3B): 272S–280S.10.1016/0002-9343(91)90381-7Google Scholar
7. Tenover, FC, Arbeit, RD, Goering, RV, et al. Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J Clin Microbiol 1995;33:2233–2239.10.1128/jcm.33.9.2233-2239.1995Google Scholar
8. Nelson, DB, Jarvis, WR, Rutala, WA, et al. Multi-society guideline for reprocessing flexible gastrointestinal endoscopes. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2003;24:532–537.10.1086/502237Google Scholar
9. Alvarado, CJ, Reichelderfer, M. APIC guidelines for infection prevention and control in flexible endoscopy. Am J Infect Control 2000;28:138–155.10.1067/mic.2000.106054Google Scholar