Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T00:14:56.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Microbial burden on environmental surfaces in patient rooms before daily cleaning—Analysis of multiple confounding variables

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2021

John M. Boyce Open the ORCID record for John M. Boyce [Opens in a new window] ,
Nancy L. Havill ,
Kerri A. Guercia  and
Brent A. Moore
John M. Boyce*
Affiliation:
Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut [Present affiliation: J.M. Boyce Consulting, Middletown, CT (J.M.B.)]
Nancy L. Havill
Affiliation:
Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
Kerri A. Guercia
Affiliation:
Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
Brent A. Moore
Affiliation:
Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut [Present affiliation: J.M. Boyce Consulting, Middletown, CT (J.M.B.)]
*
Author for correspondence: John M. Boyce, E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives:

Estimated levels of microbial burden on hospital environmental surfaces vary substantially among published studies. Cultures obtained during a cluster-controlled crossover trial of a quaternary ammonium (Quat) disinfectant versus an improved hydrogen peroxide (IHP) disinfectant provided additional data on the amount of microbial burden on selected surfaces.

Methods:

RODAC plates containing D/E neutralizing agar were used to sample a convenience sample of 5–8 high-touch surfaces in patient rooms on 2 medical wards, an intensive care unit, and a step-down unit at a large hospital. Before routine daily cleaning, samples were obtained in varying rooms over an 11-month period. RODAC plates (1 per surface sampled) were incubated for 72 hours, and aerobic colony counts per plate (ACCs) were determined. Statistical analysis was used to determine the potential impact on ACCs of study period, cleaning compliance rate, disinfectant used, ward, surface sampled, and isolation room status.

Results:

Overall, 590 cultures were obtained on Quat wards and 589 on IHP wards. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that mean ACCs differed significantly by site (P < .001), type of ward (P < .001), isolation room status (P = .039), and study period (P = .036). The highest mean ACCs per RODAC plate were on toilet seats (112.8), bedside rails (92.0), and bathroom grab bars (79.5).

Conclusions:

The combination of factors analyzed revealed that estimating microbial burden is complex and is affected by multiple factors. Additional studies should evaluate individual sites, ward types, cleaning and disinfection practices, and isolation room status.

Type
Original Article
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 43 , Issue 9 , September 2022 , pp. 1142 - 1146
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Otter, JA, Yezli, S, Salkeld, JA, French, GL. Evidence that contaminated surfaces contribute to the transmission of hospital pathogens and an overview of strategies to address contaminated surfaces in hospital settings. Am J Infect Control 2013;41:S6–S11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, DJ, Anderson, D, Rutala, WA. The role of the surface environment in healthcare-associated infections. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2013;26:338–344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donskey, CJ. Does improving surface cleaning and disinfection reduce healthcare-associated infections? Am J Infect Control 2013;41:S12–S19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huslage, K, Rutala, WA, Gergen, MF, Sickbert-Bennett, EE, Weber, DJ. Microbial assessment of high-, medium-, and low-touch hospital room surfaces. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013;34:211–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, G, Muzslay, M, Wilson, AP. The type, level, and distribution of microorganisms within the ward environment: a zonal analysis of an intensive care unit and a gastrointestinal surgical ward. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013;34:500–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shams, AM, Rose, LJ, Edwards, JR, et al. Assessment of the overall and multidrug-resistant organism bioburden on environmental surfaces in healthcare facilities. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;37:1426–1432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rutala, WA, Kanamori, H, Gergen, MF, et al. Enhanced disinfection leads to reduction of microbial contamination and a decrease in patient colonization and infection. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;39:1118–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanner, WD, Leecaster, MK, Zhang, Y, et al. Environmental contamination of contact precaution and non-contact precaution patient rooms in six acute-care facilities. Clin Infect Dis 2021;72:S8–S16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, LF, Knelson, LP, Gergen, MF, et al. A prospective study of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) between environmental sites and hospitalized patients—the TransFER study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2019;40:47–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyce, JM, Guercia, KA, Sullivan, L, et al. Prospective cluster controlled crossover trial to compare the impact of an improved hydrogen peroxide disinfectant and a quaternary ammonium-based disinfectant on surface contamination and healthcare outcomes. Am J Infect Control 2017;45:1006–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dancer, SJ, White, L, Robertson, C. Monitoring environmental cleanliness on two surgical wards. Int J Hyg Environ Health Res 2008;18:357–364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayden, MK, Bonten, MJ, Blom, DW, Lyle, EA, van de Vijver, DA, Weinstein, RA. Reduction in acquisition of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus after enforcement of routine environmental cleaning measures. Clin Infect Dis 2006;42:1552–1560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyce, JM, Havill, NL, Dumigan, DG, Golebiewski, M, Balogun, O, Rizvani, R. Monitoring the effectiveness of hospital cleaning practices by use of an adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence assay. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2009;30:678–684.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, AP, Smyth, D, Moore, G, et al. The impact of enhanced cleaning within the intensive care unit on contamination of the near-patient environment with hospital pathogens: a randomized crossover study in critical care units in two hospitals. Crit Care Med 2011;39:651–658.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Attaway, HH, III, Fairey, S, Steed, LL, Salgado, CD, Michels, HT, Schmidt, MG. Intrinsic bacterial burden associated with intensive care unit hospital beds: effects of disinfection on population recovery and mitigation of potential infection risk. Am J Infect Control 2012;40:907–912.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Claro, T, O’Reilly, M, Daniels, S, Humphreys, H. Surface microbial contamination in hospitals: a pilot study on methods of sampling and the use of proposed microbiologic standards. Am J Infect Control 2015;43:1000–1002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhalla, A, Aron, DC, Donskey, CJ. Staphylococcus aureus intestinal colonization is associated with increased frequency of S. aureus on skin of hospitalized patients. BMC Infect Dis 2007;7:105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, MG, Attaway Iii, HH, Fairey, SE, Steed, LL, Michels, HT, Salgado, CD. Copper continuously limits the concentration of bacteria resident on bed rails within the intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013;34:530–533.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adams, CE, Smith, J, Watson, V, Robertson, C, Dancer, SJ. Examining the association between surface bioburden and frequently touched sites in intensive care. J Hosp Infect 2017;95:76–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faires, MC, Pearl, DL, Ciccotelli, WA, et al. A prospective study to examine the epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Clostridium difficile contamination in the general environment of three community hospitals in southern Ontario, Canada. BMC Infect Dis 2012;12:290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mulvey, D, Redding, P, Robertson, C, et al. Finding a benchmark for monitoring hospital cleanliness. J Hosp Infect 2011;77:25–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deshpande, A, Dunn, AN, Fox, J, et al. Monitoring the effectiveness of daily cleaning practices in an intensive care unit (ICU) setting using an adenosine triphosphate (ATP) bioluminescence assay. Am J Infect Control 2020;48:757–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cadnum, JL, Hurless, KN, Kundrapu, S, Donskey, CJ. Transfer of Clostridium difficile spores by nonsporicidal wipes and improperly used hypochlorite wipes: practice + product = perfection. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013;34:441–442.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Widmer, FC, Frei, R, Romanyuk, A, Tschudin Sutter, S, Widmer, AF. Overall bioburden by total colony count does not predict the presence of pathogens with high clinical relevance in hospital and community environments. J Hosp Infect 2019;101:240–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mody, L, Washer, LL, Kaye, KS, et al. Multidrug-resistant organisms in hospitals: what is on patient hands and in their rooms? Clin Infect Dis 2019;69:1837–1844.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed