Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T23:18:16.194Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Control in Hospitals: The Dutch Experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

C.M.J.E. Vandenbroucke-Grauls
C.M.J.E. Vandenbroucke-Grauls*
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infection Control, University Hospital Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
*
PO Box 7057, 1007MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Netherlands is one of the few countries where methi-cillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) still is uncommon. In 1988, the Werkgroep Infectie Preventie (Working Party on Infection Prevention) issued guidelines on the control of MRSA that could be applied nationwide. The mainstay of the guideline is that all patients who carry MRSA are strictly isolated in single rooms. In 1989, a surveillance study was started by the National Institute of Public Health and the Environment. This study showed that approximately 200 new cases of MRSA colonization or infection occur each year. Small outbreaks of MRSA occur occasionally in The Netherlands, but the surveillance data confirm the success of the Dutch policy.

Type
From the Fourth International Conference on the Prevention of Infection
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 17 , Issue 8 , August 1996 , pp. 512 - 513
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Brumfitt, W, Hamilton-Miller, J. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus . N Engl J Med 1989;320:1188–1196.Google Scholar
2. Thompson, RL, Wenzel, RP. International recognition of methicillin-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus . Ann Intern Med 1982;97:925–926.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Turnidge, J, Lawson, P, Munro, R, Benn, R. A national survey of antimicrobial resistance in Staphylococcus aureus in Australian teaching hospitals. Med J Aust 1989;150:65–72.Google Scholar
4. Voss, A, Milatovic, D, Wallrauch-Schwarz, C, Rosdahl, VT, Braveny, I. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Europe. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1994;13:50–55.Google Scholar
5. Hendriks, WDH, Poessé, MH. Meticilline-resistente stafy-lokokken in een algemeen ziekenhuis. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1988;132:422.Google Scholar
6. Van Keulen, PHJ, Zanen, HC, van den Berg, PCM. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus . Lancet 1985;ii:220.Google Scholar
7. Vandenbroucke-Grauls, CMJE, Frénay, HME, van Klingeren, B, Savelkoul, TF, Verhoef, J. Control of epidemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a Dutch university hospital. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1991;10:6–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Working Party Infection Prevention. Management policy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Guideline no. 35a (revised); 1995.Google Scholar
9. Pearman, JW, Grubb, WB. Preventing the importation and establishment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus MRSA in hospitals in Western Australia. APUA-Newsletter 1993;11(13):7.Google Scholar
10. Van Leeuwen, WJ, Schot, CS, Rost, JA, de Neeling, AJ, van Klingeren, B. Surveillance van meticilline resistente Staphylococcus aureus in Nederland in 1992 tot 1994. Report no. 359002004, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment; June 1995.Google Scholar