Background: A large healthcare system in Georgia went live with an enhanced electronic infection surveillance system in August of 2018. The system was employed at its facilities using a staggered approach. Prior to the implementation of this infection surveillance platform, the healthcare system performed healthcare-associated infection (HAI) surveillance using an in-house culture-based system. The NHSN estimates that culture-based surveillance misses 50%–60% of true surgical site infections (SSIs). Due to the lack of clinical-based detection methods (eg, radiologic imaging), we were unable to appropriately detect all patient harm using the old surveillance system. Method: A retrospective analysis was performed to assess the change in HAI for colon (COLO), abdominal hysterectomy (HYST), hip prosthesis (HPRO), and knee prosthesis (KPRO). SSI cases that met NHSN surveillance criteria were reviewed to determine whether they would have been identified prior to launching the new enhanced electronic surveillance system. Results: Systemwide, 8 of 26 COLO SSIs (31%) and 9 of 18 HYST SSIs (50%) would have not been detected using our old surveillance system. HPRO SSIs and KPRO SSIs identified by our new surveillance system were detected using our old surveillance system, and no change was observed. Conclusion: This analysis showed an increase in COLO SSIs and HYST SSIs from enhanced surveillance. Electronic surveillance systems are not considered as a risk factor in the NHSN annual facility survey that aids in calculating a facility’s standardized infection ratio (SIR). These data help support NHSN consideration of modifying the logistic regression calculation used for the complex SSI models. This revision would allow facilities to compare themselves equitably to those using electronic infection surveillance.

Funding: None

Disclosures: None