Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-22T11:14:09.565Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Chlorhexidine in Ethanol and in Isopropanol on the Bacterial Colonization of the Umbilicus of Newborns

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

B. Nyström ,
S. Bygdeman ,
A. Henningsson ,
R. Tunell  and
U. Berg
B. Nyström*
Affiliation:
Departments of Clinical Microbiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Pediatrics, Huddinge University Hospital, Sweden
S. Bygdeman
Affiliation:
Departments of Clinical Microbiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Pediatrics, Huddinge University Hospital, Sweden
A. Henningsson
Affiliation:
Departments of Clinical Microbiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Pediatrics, Huddinge University Hospital, Sweden
R. Tunell
Affiliation:
Departments of Clinical Microbiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Pediatrics, Huddinge University Hospital, Sweden
U. Berg
Affiliation:
Departments of Clinical Microbiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Pediatrics, Huddinge University Hospital, Sweden
*
Department of Clinical Microbiology, Huddinge University Hospital, S-141 86 Huddinge, Sweden
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effect of daily treatment with 0.5% Chlorhexidine in 70% ethanol and in 70% isopropanol, respectively, on navel colonization and on rates of infection in newborns has been studied in 438 infants in two maternity wards during a 3-month period. In spite of isopropanol being reported as a more efficient skin disinfectant than ethanol in several experimental models, no significant differences were seen in the frequency of navel colonization or in infection rates between the two treatment groups. The colonization rate with S. aureus was lower in this than in an earlier investigation on navel disinfection with Chlorhexidine in ethanol performed in the same wards. This may reflect a progressive effectiveness of the treatment due to fewer S. aureus sources in the nursery. For practical reasons we continue to recommend daily navel disinfection with 0.5% Chlorhexidine in 70% ethanol on healthy newborns in hospital nurseries.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 6 , Issue 5 , May 1985 , pp. 186 - 188
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Bygdeman, S, Hambraeus, A, Henningsson, A: Influence of ethanol with and without Chlorhexidine on the bacterial colonization of the umbilicus of newborn babies. Infect Control 1984;5:275–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Coulthar, CE, Sykes, G: Germicidal effect of alcohol. Pharmaceutical Journal 1936;137:79–81.Google Scholar
3.Rotter, M, Koller, W, Kundi, M: Eignung dreier Alkohole fur eine Standard-Desinfektionsmethode in der Wertbestimmung von Verfahren fur die Hygienische Händedesinfektion. Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg [B] 1977;164:428–438.Google Scholar
4.Seeberg, S, Brinkhoff, B: Epidemiology and control of staphylococcal pyoderma among newborn infants: Evaluation of a method for routine cord care with 4 per cent chlorhexidine-detergent solution. J Hosp Infect 1984;5:121–126.Google Scholar