Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T04:26:56.142Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Improved rates of antimicrobial stewardship interventions following implementation of the Epic antimicrobial stewardship module

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2018

Natasha N. Pettit*
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacy, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
Zhe Han
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacy, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
Anish R. Choksi
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacy, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
Angella Charnot-Katsikas
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
Kathleen G. Beavis
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
Vera Tesic
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
Palak Bhagat
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacy, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
Cynthia T. Nguyen
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacy, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
Allison H. Bartlett
Affiliation:
Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Global Health Division, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
Jennifer Pisano
Affiliation:
Infectious Diseases and Global Health, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
*
Author for correspondence: Natasha N. Pettit, PharmD, BCPS (AQ-ID), 5841 S Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL 60605. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

We evaluated the impact of the Epic antimicrobial stewardship module (EAM) on the number of interventions, antimicrobial usage, and clinical outcomes. Use of the EAM allowed us to significantly increase the number of ASP antimicrobial reviews and interventions while maintaining a sustained impact on antimicrobial utilization.

Type
Concise Communication
Copyright
© 2018 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved. 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Fishman, N. Policy statement on antimicrobial stewardship by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA), the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), and the Pediatric Diseases Society (PIDS). Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2012;33:322327.Google Scholar
2. Barlam, TF, Cosgrove, SE, Abbo, LM, et al. Implementing an antibiotic stewardship program: guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. Clin Infect Dis 2016;62:127.Google Scholar
3. The Joint Commission. Prepublication requirements: new antimicrobial stewardship standard. Joint Comm Perspect June 22, 2016.Google Scholar
4. Core elements of hospital antibiotic stewardship programs. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. http://www.cdc.gov/getsmart/healthcare/ implementation/core-elements.html. Published 2014. Accessed May 15, 2018.Google Scholar
5. Perez, KK, Olsen, RJ, Musick, WL, et al. Integrating rapid diagnostics and antimicrobial stewardship improves outcomes in patients with antibiotic resistant gram-negative bacteremia. J Infect 2014;69:216225.Google Scholar
6. Wenzler, E, Wang, F, Goff, DA, et al. An automated, pharmacist-driven initiative improves quality of care for Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis 2017;65:194200.Google Scholar
7. Nguyen, CT, Gandhi, T, Chenoweth, C, et al. Impact of an antimicrobial stewardship-led intervention for Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: a quasi-experimental study. J Antimicr Chemother 2015;70:33903396.Google Scholar