Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:54:39.957Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact of Switching from an Open to a Closed Infusion System on Rates of Central Line–Associated Bloodstream Infection: A Meta-analysis of Time-Sequence Cohort Studies in 4 Countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Dennis G. Maki ,
Victor D. Rosenthal ,
Reinaldo Salomao ,
Fabio Franzetti  and
Manuel Sigfrido Rangel-Frausto
Dennis G. Maki
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison
Victor D. Rosenthal*
Affiliation:
Colegiales and Bernal Medical Centers, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Reinaldo Salomao
Affiliation:
Santa Marcelina Hospital, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Fabio Franzetti
Affiliation:
Sacco Hospital, Milan, Italy
Manuel Sigfrido Rangel-Frausto
Affiliation:
Specialties Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social Hospital, Mexico City, Mexico
*
Corrientes Ave 4580, Floor 11, Apartment A, Buenos Aires 1195, Argentina ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background.

We report a meta-analysis of 4 identical time-series cohort studies of the impact of switching from use of open infusion containers (glass bottle, burette, or semirigid plastic bottle) to closed infusion containers (fully collapsible plastic containers) on central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates and all-cause intensive care unit (ICU) mortality in 15 adult ICUs in Argentina, Brazil, Italy, and Mexico.

Methods.

All ICUs used open infusion containers for 6–12 months, followed by switching to closed containers. Patient characteristics, adherence to infection control practices, CLABSI rates, and ICU mortality during the 2 periods were compared by χ2 test for each country, and the results were combined using meta-analysis.

Results.

Similar numbers of patients participated in 2 periods (2,237 and 2,136). Patients in each period had comparable Average Severity of Illness Scores, risk factors for CLABSI, hand hygiene adherence, central line care, and mean duration of central line placement. CLABSI incidence dropped markedly in all 4 countries after switching from an open to a closed infusion container (pooled results, from 10.1 to 3.3 CLABSIs per 1,000 central line-days; relative risk [RR], 0.33 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.24-0.46]; P<.001). All-cause ICU mortality also decreased significantiy, from 22.0 to 16.9 deaths per 100 patients (RR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.68-0.87]; P<.001).

Conclusions.

Switching from an open to a closed infusion container resulted in a striking reduction in the overall CLABSI incidence and all-cause ICU mortality. Data suggest that open infusion containers are associated with a greatiy increased risk of infusion-related bloodstream infection and increased ICU mortality that have been unrecognized. Furthermore, data suggest CLABSIs are associated with significant attributable mortality.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , January 2011 , pp. 50 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Jarvis, WR. Selected aspects of the socioeconomic impact of nosocomial infections: morbidity, mortality, cost, and prevention. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1996;17(8):552–557.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Laupland, KB, Zygun, DA, Doig, CJ, Bagshaw, SM, Svenson, LW, Fick, GH. One-year mortality of bloodstream infection-associated sepsis and septic shock among patients presenting to a regional critical care system. Intensive Care Med 2005;31(2):213–219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Maki, DG, Goldman, DA, Rhame, FS. Infection control in intravenous therapy. Ann Intern Med 1973;79(6):867–887.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Maki, DG. Nosocomial bacteremia: an epidemiologic overview. Am J Med 1981;70(3):719–732.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Bjornson, HS, Colley, R, Bower, RH, Duty, VP, Schwartz-Fulton, JT, Fischer, JE. Association between microorganism growth at the catheter insertion site and colonization of the catheter in patients receiving total parenteral nutrition. Surgery 1982;92(4):720–727.Google ScholarPubMed
6.Cooper, GL, Hopkins, CC. Rapid diagnosis of intravascular catheter-associated infection by direct Gram staining of catheter segments. N Engl J Med 1985;312(18):1142–1147.Google Scholar
7.Maki, DG, Stolz, SM, Wheeler, S, Mermel, LA. Prevention of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection by use of an antiseptic-impregnated catheter: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 1997; 127(4):257–266.Google Scholar
8.Safdar, N, Maki, DG. The pathogenesis of catheter-related bloodstream infection with noncuffed short-term central venous catheters. Intensive Care Med 2004;30(1):62–67.Google Scholar
9.Maki, DG, Rhame, FS, Mackel, DC, Bennett, JV. Nationwide epidemic of septicemia caused by contaminated intravenous products. I. Epidemiologic and clinical features. Am J Med 1976;60(4):471–485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Maki, DG, Anderson, RL, Shulman, JA. In-use contamination of intravenous infusion fluid. Appl Microbiol 1974;28(5):778–784.Google Scholar
11.Macias, AE, Munoz, JM, Galvan, A, et al. Nosocomial bacteremia in neonates related to poor standards of care. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2005;24(8): 713–716.Google Scholar
12.Clinical sepsis and death in a newborn nursery associated with contaminated parenteral medications—Brazil, 1996. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1998;47(29):610–612.Google Scholar
13.Garrett, DO, McDonald, LC, Wanderley, A, et al. An outbreak of neonatal deaths in Brazil associated with contaminated intravenous fluids. J Infect Dis 2002;186(1):81–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Matsaniotis, NS, Syriopoulou, VP, Theodoridou, MC, Tzanetou, KG, Mos-trou, GI. Enterobacter sepsis in infants and children due to contaminated intravenous fluids. Infect Control 1984;5(10):471–477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Moore, KL, Kainer, MA, Badrawi, N, et al. Neonatal sepsis in Egypt associated with bacterial contamination of glucose-containing intravenous fluids. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2005;24(7):590–594.Google Scholar
16.Macias, AE, Munoz, JM, Bruckner, DA, et al. Parenteral infusions bacterial contamination in a multi-institutional survey in Mexico: considerations for nosocomial mortality. Am J Infect Control 1999;27(3):285–290.Google Scholar
17.Rosenthal, VD, Guzman, S, Crnich, C. Device-associated nosocomial infection rates in intensive care units of Argentina. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2004;25(3):251–255.Google Scholar
18.Rangel-Frausto, MS, Higuera-Ramirez, F, Martinez-Soto, J, Rosenthal, VD. Should we use closed or open infusion containers for prevention of bloodstream infections? Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 2010;9:6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Vilins, M, Blecher, S, Maretti da Silva, MA, Rosenthal, VD, Barker, K, Salomao, R. Rate and time to develop first central line-associated bloodstream infections when comparing open and closed infusion containers in a Brazilian hospital. Braz J Infect Dis 2009; 13(5):335–340.Google Scholar
20.Franzetti, F, Borghi, B, Raimondi, F, Rosenthal, VD. Impact on rates and time to first central vascular-associated bloodstream infection when switching from open to closed intravenous infusion containers in a hospital setting. Epidemiol Infect 2009;137(7):1041–1048.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Rosenthal, VD, Maki, DG, Mehta, A, et al. International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium report, data summary for 2002-2007, issued January 2008. Am J Infect Control 2008;36(9):627–637.Google Scholar
22.Rosenthal, VD, Maki, DG, Graves, N. The International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC): goals and objectives, description of surveillance methods, and operational activities. Am J Infect Control 2008;36(9):e1–e12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Rosenthal, VD, Maki, DG, Jamulitrat, S, et al. International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC) report, data summary for 2003-2008, issued June 2009. Am J Infect Control 2010;38(2):95–104.e2.Google Scholar
24.Edwards, JR, Peterson, KD, Andrus, ML, Dudeck, MA, Pollock, DA, Horan, TC. National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) report, data summary for 2006 through 2007, issued November 2008. Am J Infect Control 2008;36(9):609–626.Google Scholar
25.Emori, TG, Culver, DH, Horan, TC, et al. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance system (NNIS): description of surveillance methods. Am J Infect Control 1991;19(1):19–35.Google Scholar
26.Horan, TC, Andrus, M, Dudeck, MA. CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control 2008;36(5):309–332.Google Scholar
27.Rosenthal, VD, Guzman, S, Crnich, C. Impact of an infection control program on rates of ventilator-associated pneumonia in intensive care units in 2 Argentinean hospitals. Am J Infect Control 2006;34(2):58–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28.Rosenthal, VD, Guzman, S, Pezzotto, SM, Crnich, CJ. Effect of an infection control program using education and performance feedback on rates of intravascular device-associated bloodstream infections in intensive care units in Argentina. Am J Infect Control 2003;31(7):405–409.Google Scholar
29.Rosenthal, VD, Guzman, S, Safdar, N. Reduction in nosocomial infection with improved hand hygiene in intensive care units of a tertiary care hospital in Argentina. Am J Infect Control 2005;33(7):392–397.Google Scholar
30.Rosenthal, VD, Guzman, S, Safdar, N. Effect of education and performance feedback on rates of catheter-associated urinary tract infection in intensive care units in Argentina. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2004;25(1):47–50.Google Scholar
31.Maki, DG, Weise, CE, Sarafin, HW. A semiquantitative culture method for identifying intravenous catheter-related infection. N Engl J Med 1977;296(23):1305–1309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32.Sutton, AJ. Methods for Meta-Analysis in Medical Research. Chichester, England: Wiley; 2000.Google Scholar
33.Blettner, M, Sauerbrei, W, Schlehofer, B, Scheuchenpflug, T, Friedenreich, C. Traditional reviews, meta-analyses and pooled analyses in epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol 1999;28(1):1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34.Mattie, AS, Webster, BL. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' “never events”: an analysis and recommendations to hospitals. Health Care Manag (Frederick) 2008;27(4):338–349.Google Scholar
35.Posa, PJ, Harrison, D, Vollman, KM. Elimination of central line-associated bloodstream infections: application of the evidence. AACN Adv Crit Care 2006; 17(4):446–454.Google Scholar
36.Chaberny, IF, Ruseva, E, Sohr, D, et al. Surveillance with successful reduction of central line-associated bloodstream infections among neutropenic patients with hematologic or oncologic malignancies. Ann Hematol 2009;88(9):907–912.Google Scholar
37.Costello, JM, Morrow, DF, Graham, DA, Potter-Bynoe, G, Sandora, TJ, Laussen, PC. Systematic intervention to reduce central line-associated bloodstream infection rates in a pediatric cardiac intensive care unit. Pediatrics 2008;121(5):915–923.Google Scholar
38.Warren, DK, Zack, JE, Mayfield, JL, et al. The effect of an education program on the incidence of central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infection in a medical ICU. Chest 2004;126(5):1612–1618.Google Scholar
39.Ramritu, P, Halton, K, Cook, D, Whitby, M, Graves, N. Catheter-related bloodstream infections in intensive care units: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Adv Nurs 2008;62(1):3–21.Google Scholar
40.Rossello-Urgell, J. Nosocomial infection surveillance and control activities in Spain under HELICS and NosoMed programs frame. J Hosp Infect 2004;56(suppl 2):S55–S57.Google Scholar
41.Rosenthal, VD. Device-associated nosocomial infections in limited-resources countries: findings of the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC). Am J Infect Control 2008;36(10):S171 e7–el2.Google Scholar
42.Raka, L. Lowbury Lecture 2008: infection control and limited resources—searching for the best solutions. J Hosp Infect 2009;72(4):292–298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43.Huskins, WC, Soule, BM, O'Boyle, C, Gulacsi, L, O'Rourke, EJ, Goldmann, DA. Hospital infection prevention and control: a model for improving the quality of hospital care in low- and middle-income countries. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1998;19(2):125–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44.Rosenthal, VD, Maki, DG. Prospective study of the impact of open and closed infusion systems on rates of central venous catheter-associated bacteremia. Am J Infect Control 2004;32(3):135–141.Google Scholar
45.Rosenthal, VD. Central line-associated bloodstream infections in limited-resource countries: a review of the literature. Clin Infect Dis 2009;49(12):1899–1907.Google Scholar
46.van der Kooi, TI, de Boer, AS, Mannien, J, et al. Incidence and risk factors of device-associated infections and associated mortality at the intensive care in the Dutch surveillance system. Intensive Care Med 2007;33(2):271–278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
47.Renaud, B, Brun-Buisson, C. Outcomes of primary and catheter-related bacteremia: a cohort and case-control study in critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;163(7):1584–1590.Google Scholar
48.Pittet, D, Tarara, D, Wenzel, RP. Nosocomial bloodstream infection in critically ill patients: excess length of stay, extra costs, and attributable mortality. JAMA 1994;271(20):1598–1601.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
49.Vanholder, V, Hoenich, N, Ringoir, S. Morbidity and mortality of central venous catheter hemodialysis: a review of 10 years' experience. Nephron 1987;47(4):274–279.Google Scholar
50.Maki, DG, Kluger, DM, Crnich, CJ. The risk of bloodstream infection in adults with different intravascular devices: a systematic review of 200 published prospective studies. Mayo Clin Proc 2006;81(9):1159–1171.Google Scholar
51.Crnich, CJ, Maki, DG. The promise of novel technology for the prevention of intravascular device-related bloodstream infection. I. Pathogenesis and short-term devices. Clin Infect Dis 2002;34(9):1232–1242.Google Scholar
52.Crnich, CJ, Maki, DG. The role of intravascular devices in sepsis. Curr Infect Dis Rep 2001;3(6):496–506.Google Scholar
53.Ivy, DD, Calderbank, M, Wagner, BD, et al. Closed-hub systems with protected connections and the reduction of risk of catheter-related blood-stream infection in pediatric patients receiving intravenous prostanoid therapy for pulmonary hypertension. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2009;30(9):823–829.Google Scholar
54.Rosenthal, VD, Franzetti, F, Salomao, R, et al. Impact of switching from an open to a closed infusion container on incidence of microorganisms associated with central line-associated bloodstream infection in Latin America and Europe. Paper presented at: 19th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America; March 19-22, 2009; San Diego, CA.Google Scholar