Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T02:42:38.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact of a Shielded Safety Syringe on Needlestick Injuries Among Healthcare Workers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Barbara Younger ,
Ella H. Hunt ,
Cecil Robinson ,
Cheryl McLemore  and
Sherri Hickey
Barbara Younger
Affiliation:
Infection Control, Pacific Presbyterian Medical Center, San Francisco, California
Ella H. Hunt
Affiliation:
Department of Employee Health Services, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville, Virginia
Cecil Robinson
Affiliation:
Infection Control, Medical Center Hospital, San Antonio, Texas
Cheryl McLemore
Affiliation:
Occupational Health Services, Pacific Presbyterian Medical Center, San Francisco, California
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives:

Evaluate the impact of a shielded 3 cc safety syringe on needlestick injuries among healthcare workers.

Design:

Surveillance study.

Setting:

Three medical centers.

Results:

The total number of needlesticks from all sources rose from 134 during the baseline period to 140 during the study phase. However, the overall rate of needlesticks involving 3 cc syringes decreased from 14/100,000 inventory units to 2/100,000, and the frequency declined substantially at each of the participating medical centers.

Conclusions:

These results suggest that shielded syringes and related technology may offer potential for reducing the risk of needlestick injuries among hospital and other healthcare employees. This study should be viewed as a preliminary effort to assess the potential of shielded-syringe technology for reducing the risk of needlestick injuries among healthcare workers. The results are encouraging, but more clinical experience with this new device and longer follow up are essential to provide the data necessary for a definitive assessment of efficacy.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 13 , Issue 6 , June 1992 , pp. 349 - 353
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Jagger, J, Hunt, EH, Brand-Elnaggar, J, Pearson, RD. Rates of needlestick injury caused by various devices. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:284–288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. McCray, E, Cooperative Needlestick Surveillance Group. Occupational risk of the acquired immunodeticiency syndrome among health care workers. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:1127–1132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Orient, JM. Assessing the risk of occupational acquisition of the human immunodeficiency virus: implications for hospital policy. South Med J. 1990;83:1121–1127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Brown, B, Brown, J. Risk of AIDS in healthcare workers. Nursing Management. 1988;19:33–35.Google ScholarPubMed
5. Centers for Disease Control. Current trends in occupational finger injuries-United States 1982. MMWR. 1983;32:589–591.Google Scholar
6. Hamory, BH. Underreporting of needlestick injuries in a university hospital. Am J Infect Control. 1983;11:174–177.Google Scholar
7. McGeer, A, Simor, AE, Low, DE. Epidemiology of needlestick injuries in house officer. /Infect Dis. 1990;162:961–964.Google Scholar
8. Ribner, BS, Landry, MN, Gholson, GL, Linden, LA. Impact of a rigid, puncture resistant container system upon needlestick injuries. Infect Control. 1987;8:63–66.Google Scholar
9. Wong, ES, Stotka, JL, Chinchilli, VN, et al. Are Universal Precautions effective in reducing the number of occupational exposures among health care workers? A prospective study of physicians on a medical service. JAMA. 1991;265:1123–1128.Google Scholar
10. Krasinski, K. LaCouture, R, Holzman, RS. Effect of changing needle disposal units on needle recapping frequency and needlestick injury. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1987;8:59–62.Google Scholar
11. Edmond, M, Khakoo, R, McTaggart, B, Solomon, R Effect of bedside needle disposal units on needle recapping frequency and needlestick injury. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1988;9:114–116.Google Scholar
12. De Laune, S. Risk reduction through testing, screening and infection control precautions-with special emphasis on needlestick injuries. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1990;11(10 suppl):563–565.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Kennedy, DA Needlestick injuries; mechanisms and control. J Hosp Infect. 1988;12:315–322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed