Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T19:19:34.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

If It Is Reusable, Why Not Reuse It?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Nathan L. Belkin
Nathan L. Belkin*
Affiliation:
Clearwater, Florida
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Letters to the Editor
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 23 , Issue 7 , July 2002 , pp. 357 - 358
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2002

References

1.Favero, MS. Requiem for reuse of single-use devices in US hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2001;22:539–541.Google Scholar
2.Food and Drug Administration. Reusing medical devices: ensuring safety the second time around. FDA Consumer Magazine 2000; 34:7.Google Scholar
3.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Enforcement Priorities for Single-Use Devices Reprocessed by Third Parties and Hospitals. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2000.Google Scholar
4.GAO report sheds light on reuse. Materials Management in Healthcare 2000;9:9.Google Scholar
5.Money crunch: one-third of U.S. hospitals face financial ruin. Health Facilities Management 2000;13:8.Google Scholar
6.Shields, T. British appear to reprocess fewer SUDs than U.S. Healthcare Purchasing News 2002;26:24.Google Scholar