Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:30:49.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Identifying targets for improvement using a nationally standardized survey: Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in orthopedic surgery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 August 2020

Courtney E. Ierano Open the ORCID record for Courtney E. Ierano [Opens in a new window] ,
Karin Thursky Open the ORCID record for Karin Thursky [Opens in a new window] ,
Caroline Marshall Open the ORCID record for Caroline Marshall [Opens in a new window] ,
Sonia Koning ,
Rodney James ,
Sandra Johnson ,
Nabeel Imam ,
Leon J. Worth Open the ORCID record for Leon J. Worth [Opens in a new window]  and
Trisha Peel Open the ORCID record for Trisha Peel [Opens in a new window]
Courtney E. Ierano*
Affiliation:
National Health and Medical Research Council Centre of Research Excellence: National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship (NCAS), Peter Doherty Research Institute for Infection and Immunity Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia University of Melbourne, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
Karin Thursky
Affiliation:
National Health and Medical Research Council Centre of Research Excellence: National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship (NCAS), Peter Doherty Research Institute for Infection and Immunity Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia University of Melbourne, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia Department of Infectious Diseases, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia National Centre for Infections in Cancer, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Caroline Marshall
Affiliation:
National Health and Medical Research Council Centre of Research Excellence: National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship (NCAS), Peter Doherty Research Institute for Infection and Immunity Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia University of Melbourne, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia Victorian Infectious Diseases Service (VIDS), Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia Infection Prevention and Surveillance Service, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
Sonia Koning
Affiliation:
National Health and Medical Research Council Centre of Research Excellence: National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship (NCAS), Peter Doherty Research Institute for Infection and Immunity Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Rodney James
Affiliation:
National Health and Medical Research Council Centre of Research Excellence: National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship (NCAS), Peter Doherty Research Institute for Infection and Immunity Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Sandra Johnson
Affiliation:
Victorian Healthcare Associated Infection Surveillance System (VICNISS), Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Nabeel Imam
Affiliation:
Victorian Healthcare Associated Infection Surveillance System (VICNISS), Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Leon J. Worth
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia Victorian Healthcare Associated Infection Surveillance System (VICNISS), Melbourne, Victoria, Australia National Centre for Infections in Cancer, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Trisha Peel
Affiliation:
National Health and Medical Research Council Centre of Research Excellence: National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship (NCAS), Peter Doherty Research Institute for Infection and Immunity Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Department of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Health/Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
*
Author for correspondence: Courtney E. Ierano, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) is commonly administered in orthopedic procedures. Research regarding SAP appropriateness for specific orthopedic procedures is limited and is required to facilitate targeted orthopedic prescriber behavior change.

Objectives:

To describe SAP prescribing and appropriateness for orthopedic procedures in Australian hospitals.

Design, setting, and participants:

Multicenter, national, quality improvement study with retrospective analysis of data collected from Australian hospitals via Surgical National Antimicrobial Prescribing Survey (Surgical NAPS) audits from January 1, 2016, to April 15, 2019, were analyzed.

Methods:

Logistic regression identified hospital, patient and surgical factors associated with appropriateness. Adjusted appropriateness was calculated from the multivariable model. Additional subanalyses were conducted on smaller subsets to calculate the adjusted appropriateness for specific orthopedic procedures.

Results:

In total, 140 facilities contributed to orthopedic audits in the Surgical NAPS, including 4,032 orthopedic surgical episodes and 6,709 prescribed doses. Overall appropriateness was low, 58.0% (n = 3,894). This differed for prescribed procedural (n = 3,978, 64.7%) and postprocedural doses (n = 2,731, 48.3%). The most common reasons for inappropriateness, when prophylaxis was required, was timing for procedural doses (50.9%) and duration for postprocedural prescriptions (49.8%). The adjusted appropriateness of each orthopedic procedure group was low for procedural SAP (knee surgery, 54.1% to total knee joint replacement, 74.1%). The adjusted appropriateness for postprocedural prescription was also low (from hand surgery, 40.7%, to closed reduction fractures, 68.7%).

Conclusions:

Orthopedic surgical specialties demonstrated differences across procedural and postprocedural appropriateness. The metric of appropriateness identifies targets for quality improvement and is meaningful for clinicians. Targeted quality improvement projects for orthopedic specialties need to be developed to support optimization of antimicrobial use.

Type
Original Article
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 41 , Issue 12 , December 2020 , pp. 1419 - 1428
Check for updates
Copyright
© 2020 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

PREVIOUS PRESENTATION: An abstract of this manuscript was accepted as an oral presentation for the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) 6th Decennial International Conference on Healthcare Associated Infections. However, this conference was cancelled due to the current COVID19 pandemic. The abstract is pending publication in an ICHE supplement.

References

Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Hip, Knee and Shoulder Arthroplasty: 2018 Annual Report. Adelaide: Australian Orthopaedic Association, 2018.Google Scholar
Ackerman, IN, Bohensky, MA, Zomer, E, et al. The projected burden of primary total knee and hip replacement for osteoarthritis in Australia to the year 2030. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2019;20:90.Google Scholar
Peel, TN, Dowsey, MM, Buising, KL et al. Cost analysis of debridement and retention for management of prosthetic joint infection. Clin Microbiol Infect 2013;19:181–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Surgical National Antimicrobial Prescribing in Australia: Results of the 2016 Pilot. Sydney: Australian Commission for Safety and Quality in Health Care, 2017.Google Scholar
Bennett, NJ, Bull, AL, Dunt, DR et al. Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in smaller hospitals. ANZ J Surg 2006;76:676–678.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melbourne Health. Surgical Prophylaxis Prescribing in Australian Hospitals: Results of the 2017 and 2018 Surgical National Antimicrobial Prescribing Surveys. Melbourne: Melbourne Health, 2020.Google Scholar
Ou, Y, Jing, BQ, Guo, FF et al. Audits of the quality of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in Shandong Province, China, 2006 to 2011. Am J Infect Control 2014;42:516–520.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mousavi, S, Zamani, E, Bahrami, F. An audit of perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis: compliance with the international guidelines. J Res Pharm Pract 2017;6:126–129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pittalis, S, Ferraro, F, Piselli, P et al. Appropriateness of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in the Latium region of Italy, 2008: a multicenter study. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2013;14:381–384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ierano, C, Thursky, K, Marshall, C, et al. Appropriateness of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis practices in Australia. JAMA Netw Open 2019;2:e1915003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berríos-Torres, SI, Umscheid, CA, Bratzler, DW et al. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guideline for the prevention of surgical site infection, 2017. JAMA Surg 2017;152:784–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antibiotic Expert Groups. Therapeutic Guidelines: Antibiotic. Melbourne: Therapeutic Guidelines Limited; 2019.Google Scholar
Antibiotic Expert Groups. Therapeutic Guidelines: Antibiotic. In: Therapeutic Guidelines Limited. Melbourne: Therapeutic Guidelines Limited; 2014.Google Scholar
Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia’s Health 2018. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Hospital Resources 2016–17: Australian Hospital Statistics. Health Services Series No. 86. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2018.Google Scholar
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia’s Hospitals 2016–17 at a Glance. Health Services Series No. 85. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2018.Google Scholar
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australian Hospital Peer Groups. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2015.Google Scholar
Bull, AL, Worth, LJ, Spelman, T, et al. Antibiotic prescribing practices for prevention of surgical site infections in Australia: increased uptake of national guidelines after surveillance and reporting and impact on infection rates. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2017;18:834–840.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khan, Z, Ahmed, N, Rehman, A-U, et al. Pattern of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis for surgical site infections in at two teaching hospitals, Islamabad, Pakistan. J Microbiol Infect D 2019:104–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puig-Asensio, M, Perencevich, EN, Livorsi, DJ. Prolonged postprocedural antimicrobial use: a survey of the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America Research Network. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2019;40:1281–1283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branch-Elliman, W, Pizer, SD, Dasinger, EA, et al. Facility type and surgical specialty are associated with suboptimal surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis practice patterns: a multicenter, retrospective cohort study. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2019;8:49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gans, I, Jain, A, Sirisreetreerux, N, et al. Current practice of antibiotic prophylaxis for surgical fixation of closed long bone fractures: a survey of 297 members of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association. Patient Saf Surg 2017;11:2. doi: 10.1186/s13037-016-0118-5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baraza, N, Leith, J. Are prophylactic intravenous antibiotics required in routine shoulder arthroscopic surgery? A systematic review of the literature. Joints 2018;6:54–57.Google ScholarPubMed
Wyatt, RWB, Maletis, GB, Lyon, LL, et al. Efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics in simple knee arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 2016;33:157–162.Google ScholarPubMed
Carney, J, Heckmann, N, Mayer, EN, et al. Should antibiotics be administered before arthroscopic knee surgery? A systematic review of the literature. World J Orthop 2018;9:262–270.Google ScholarPubMed
Dunn, JC, Fares, AB, Kusnezov, N, et al. Current evidence regarding routine antibiotic prophylaxis in hand surgery. HAND 2017;13:259–263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bratzler, DW, Dellinger, EP, Olsen, KM et al. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2013;70:195–283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aboltins, CA, Berdal, JE, Casas, F, et al. Hip and knee section, prevention, antimicrobials (systemic): proceedings of the International Consensus on Orthopedic Infections. J Arthroplasty 2019;34:S279–S288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yates, AJ. Postoperative prophylactic antibiotics in total joint arthroplasty. Arthroplast Today 2018;4:130–131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Branch-Elliman, W, O’Brien, W, Strymish, J, et al. Association of duration and type of surgical prophylaxis with antimicrobial-associated adverse events. JAMA Surg 2019;154:590–598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tamma, PD, Avdic, E, Li, DX, et al. Association of adverse events with antibiotic use in hospitalized patients. JAMA Intern Med 2017;177:1308–1315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broom, J, Broom, A. Fear and hierarchy: critical influences on antibiotic decision making in the operating theatre. J Hosp Infect 2017;99:124–126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ierano, C, Thursky, K, Peel, T, et al. Influences on surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis decision making by surgical craft groups, anaesthetists, pharmacists and nurses in public and private hospitals. PLoS One 2019;14:e0225011.Google ScholarPubMed
Charani, E, Tarrant, C, Moorthy, K, et al. Understanding antibiotic decision making in surgery—a qualitative analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect 2017;23:752–760.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tan, T, Shohat, N, Rondon, A, et al. Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in total joint arthroplasty: a single dose is as effective as multiple doses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2019;101:429–437.Google ScholarPubMed
De Jonge, SW, Boldingh, QJJ, Solomkin, JS, et al. Effect of postoperative continuation of antibiotic prophylaxis on the incidence of surgical site infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 2020 May 25 [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30084-0.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siddiqi, A, Forte, SA, Docter, S, et al. Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2019;101:828–842.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thornley, P, Evaniew, N, Riediger, M, et al. Postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. CMAJ Open 2015;3:E338–E343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: PDF

Ierano et al. supplementary material

Tables S1-S11 and Figures S1-S2

Download Ierano et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 1.2 MB