Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T06:53:36.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How Long Is Long Enough? Determining the Optimal Surgical Site Infection Surveillance Period

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Elizabeth Bryce  and
Leslie Forrester
Elizabeth Bryce*
Affiliation:
Infection Prevention and Control, Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Leslie Forrester
Affiliation:
Infection Prevention and Control, Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
*
Regional Medical Director, Infection Prevention and Control, Vancouver Coastal Health, JPN 1111, 899 West 12th Avenue, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9, Canada ([email protected])
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Letters to the Editor
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 33 , Issue 11 , November 2012 , pp. 1178 - 1179
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2012

References

1.Lankiewicz, , Yokoe, DS, Olsen, MA, et al.Beyond 30 days: does limiting the duration of surgical site infection follow-up limit detection? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2012;33:202–203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Horan, TC, Andrus, M, Dudeck, M. CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control 2008;36:309–332.Google Scholar
3.Dudeck, MA, Horan, TC, Peterson, KD, et al.National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) report, data summary for 2010, device-associated module. Am J Infect Control 2011;39:798–816.Google Scholar