Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:22:20.555Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hospital Clostridium difficile Infection Testing Rates: Is “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” at Play?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2016

Kevin A. Brown ,
David N. Fisman  and
Nick Daneman
Kevin A. Brown*
Affiliation:
Division of Epidemiology, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
David N. Fisman
Affiliation:
Division of Epidemiology, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Nick Daneman
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
*
Division of Epidemiology, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada ([email protected]).
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Letters to the Editor
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 35 , Issue 7 , July 2014 , pp. 911 - 912
Copyright
© 2014 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved.

References

1. Haley, VB, DiRienzo, AG, Lutterloh, EC, Stricof, RL. Quantifying sources of bias in National Healthcare Safety Network laboratory-identified Clostridium difficile infection rates. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2014;35(1):1–7.Google ScholarPubMed
2. Perencevich, EN. Using NHSN C. difficile infection rates? mind your denominator! Controv Hosp Infect Prev. 2014. http://haicontroversies.blogspot.ca/2014/01/using-nhsn-c-difficile-infection-rates.html. Accessed February 27, 2014.Google Scholar
3. Bauer, MP, Notermans, DW, van Benthem, BH., et al. Clostridium difficile infection in Europe: a hospital-based survey. Lancet 2011;377(9759):63–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Ng, V, Tang, P, Fisman, DN. Our evolving understanding of legionellosis epidemiology: learning to count. Clin Infect Dis 2008;47(5):600–602.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). CDC/National Healthcare Safty Network surveillance definitions for specific types of infections. http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/. Accessed February 27, 2014.Google Scholar
6. Lin, MY, Bonten, MJM. The dilemma of assessment bias in infection control research. Clin Infect Dis 2012;54(9):1342–1347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Longtin, Y, Trottier, S, Brochu, G, et al. Impact of the type of diagnostic assay on Clostridium difficile infection and complication rates in a mandatory reporting program. Clin Infect Dis 2012;56(1):67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar