Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T00:32:31.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Healthcare Professionals Perception of Mobile Phone Usage and Hand Hygiene Adhesion in Intensive Care Units

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2020

Evelyn Sanchez
Affiliation:
University of São Paulo
Lauro Perdigão-Neto
Affiliation:
Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Sânia Alves dos Santos
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Medical Microbiology, University of São Paulo
Camila Rizek
Affiliation:
São Paulo University
Maria Renata Gomez
Affiliation:
Hospital das Clinicas of the University of São Paulo, São Paulo Brazil
Roberta Martins
Affiliation:
University of Sao Paulo
Gaspar de Oliveira
Affiliation:
University of Sao Paulo
Thais Guimaraes
Affiliation:
Hospital das Clínicas – FMUSP
Icaro Boszczowski
Affiliation:
Hospital das Clínicas University of Sao Paulo
Flavia Rossi
Affiliation:
University of São Paulo
Maristela Freire
Affiliation:
University of Sao Paulo
Anna Levin
Affiliation:
Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Silvia Figueiredo Costa
Affiliation:
São Paulo University
Marina Farrel
Affiliation:
Universidade de Sao Paulo
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Background: The introduction of new technologies into the medical field has the duality of improvement and concerns about correct usage and cleaning. Mobile phones are used by healthcare professionals (HCPs) in the work place, and there is not an official policy about their use in health environment. Methods: We asked 60 intensive care unit (ICU) HCPs from 2 units (the burn unit and the internal medicine unit) to participate in an electronic survey about mobile phone usage and hand hygiene compliance; we also cultured the hands and mobile phones of the participants. Unfortunately, 13 HCPs did not participate. Susceptibility testing of the strains was conducted, as well as molecular testing. Results: Overall, 47 HCPs responded to the inquiry: 19% were nurses (9 of 47), 19% were resident physicians (9 of 47), 17% were nursery technicians (8 of 47), 17% were physiotherapists (8 of 47), 13% were cleaning staff (6 of 47), 11% were consultants (5 of 47), and 4% were technicians (2 of 47). Moreover, 26 of 47 participants (55%) were woman and 21 (45%) were men. From all HCP categories, 39 of 47 respondents (83%) reported that they had optimal hand hygiene compliance. However, 92% of respondents had a colonized hand and 90% had a colonized mobile phone. Also, 44 of 47 HCPs (94%) reported that the took their personal mobile phone into the workplace; 40 (85%) reported that they used it during the work day and 35 (74%) reported that they cleaned it. However, 8 HCPs (26%) reported that they had never cleaned the device. All of the HCPs understood that mobile phones can harbor bacteria, and 27 of 47 HCPs (57.45%) indicated that they use 70% alcohol to clean their mobile phones. In contrast, the first choice for hand hygiene was water and soap in 51% of HCPs (24 of 47). Also, 3 HCPs did not have any colonization in the hand culture but had healthcare-associated infection (HAI) pathogens in the mobile phone culture. Conclusions: A policy regarding mobile phone usage in the healthcare setting should be in place, and cleaning of electronic devices in hospitals should be standardized.

Funding: None

Disclosures: None

Funding: None

Disclosures: None

Type
Poster Presentations
Copyright
© 2020 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved.