Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T06:43:24.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Handrub Consumption Mirrors Hand Hygiene Compliance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2016

Sebastian Haubitz ,
Andrew Atkinson ,
Tanja Kaspar ,
Doris Nydegger ,
Anne Eichenberger ,
Rami Sommerstein  and
Jonas Marschall
Sebastian Haubitz*
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious Diseases, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland Division of Infectious Diseases, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
Andrew Atkinson
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious Diseases, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
Tanja Kaspar
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious Diseases, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
Doris Nydegger
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious Diseases, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
Anne Eichenberger
Affiliation:
Institute of Hospital Pharmacy, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Switzerland.
Rami Sommerstein
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious Diseases, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
Jonas Marschall
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious Diseases, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
*
Address correspondence to Sebastian Haubitz, MD, Division of Infectious Diseases, Kantonsspital Aarau, Tellstrasse, 5000 Aarau, Switzerland ([email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We assessed handrub consumption as a surrogate marker for hand hygiene compliance from 2007 to 2014. Handrub consumption varied substantially between departments but correlated in a mixed effects regression model with the number of patient-days and the observed hand hygiene compliance. Handrub consumption may supplement traditional hand hygiene observations.

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;37:707–710

Type
Concise Communications
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 37 , Issue 6 , June 2016 , pp. 707 - 710
Copyright
© 2016 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Presented in part: IDWeek 2015; San Diego, California; October 7-11, 2015.

References

REFERENCES

1. Hagel, S, Reischke, J, Kesselmeier, M, et al. Quantifying the Hawthorne effect in hand hygiene compliance through comparing direct observation with automated hand hygiene monitoring. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2015;36:957–962.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Haessler, S. The Hawthorne effect in measurements of hand hygiene compliance: a definite problem, but also an opportunity. BMJ Qual Saf 2014;23:965–967.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Sodre da Costa, LS, Neves, VM, Marra, AR, et al. Measuring hand hygiene compliance in a hematology-oncology unit: a comparative study of methodologies. Am J Infect Control 2013;41:997–1000.Google Scholar
4. Magnus, TP, Marra, AR, Camargo, TZ, et al. Measuring hand hygiene compliance rates in different special care settings: a comparative study of methodologies. Int J Infect Dis 2015;33:205–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Sax, H, Allegranzi, B, Chraiti, MN, Boyce, J, Larson, E, Pittet, D. The World Health Organization hand hygiene observation method. Am J Infect Control 2009;37:827–834.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Marra, AR, Moura, DF Jr, Paes, AT, dos Santos, OF, Edmond, MB. Measuring rates of hand hygiene adherence in the intensive care setting: a comparative study of direct observation, product usage, and electronic counting devices. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31:796–801.Google Scholar
7. Tschudin-Sutter, S, Sepulcri, D, Dangel, M, Schuhmacher, H, Widmer, AF. Compliance with the World Health Organization hand hygiene technique: a prospective observational study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2015;36:482–483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Boyce, JM. Measuring healthcare worker hand hygiene activity: current practices and emerging technologies. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011;32:1016–1028.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Morgan, DJ, Pineles, L, Shardell, M, et al. Automated hand hygiene count devices may better measure compliance than human observation. Am J Infect Control 2012;40:955–959.Google Scholar