Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T21:14:11.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hand Hygiene Among Laboratory Workers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Emine Alp ,
Diana Haverkate  and
Andreas Voss
Emine Alp
Affiliation:
Nijmegen University Center of Infectious Diseases, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey
Diana Haverkate
Affiliation:
Nijmegen University Center of Infectious Diseases, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Andreas Voss*
Affiliation:
Nijmegen University Center of Infectious Diseases, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
*
Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, P.O. Box 9015, 6500 GS Nijmegen, The Netherlands, ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We performed a study to measure the compliance of laboratory personnel with different components of hand hygiene. The level of compliance at the end of duty was 100%; however, 36.7% of subjects wore a ring, 46.9% wore a watch, and 6.1% wore a bracelet. Pathogenic microorganisms were exclusively found on hands of laboratory personnel who wore jewelry. After interventions, the level of compliance with the no-jewelry policy among laboratory personnel showed sustained improvement. Efforts to improve hand hygiene should be directed not only at healthcare workers but also at laboratory personnel.

Type
Concise Communications
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 27 , Issue 9 , September 2006 , pp. 978 - 980
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Sewell, DL. Laboratory-associated infections and biosafety. Clin Microbiol Rev 1995; 8:389–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Voss, A, Nulens, E. Prevention and control of laboratory-acquired infections. In: Murray, PR, Baron, EJ, Pfaller, AM, Tenover, FC, Yolken, RH, eds. Manual of Clinical Microbiology. 8th ed. ASM Press, Washington DC: ASM Press; 2003:109–120.Google Scholar
3.Watanakunakorn, C, Wang, C, Hazy, J. An observational study of hand washing and infection control practices by healthcare workers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1998; 19:858–860.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Pittet, D, Mourouga, P, Perneger, TV. Compliance with hand-washing in a teaching hospital. Ann Intern Med 1999; 130:126–130.Google Scholar
5.Bischoff, WE, Reynolds, TM, Sessler, CN, Edmond, MB, Wenzel, RP. Handwashing compliance by health care workers: the impact of introducing an accessible, alcohol-based hand antiseptic. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160:1017–1021.Google Scholar
6.Goldmann, D, Larson, E. Hand washing and nosocomial infection. N Engl J Med 1992; 327:120–122.Google Scholar
7.Hirschmann, H, Fux, L, Podusel, J, et al. The influence of hand hygiene prior to insertion of peripheral venous catheters on the frequency of complications. J Hosp Infect 2001; 49:199–203.Google Scholar
8.Pittet, D. Compliance with hand disinfection and its impact on hospital-acquired infections. J Hosp Infect 2001; 48(Suppl A):S40–S46.Google Scholar
9.Ehrenkranz, NJ, Alfonso, BC. Failure of bland soap handwashing to prevent hand transfer of patient bacteria to urethral catheters. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1991; 12:654–662.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Rotter, M. Hand washing and hand disinfection. In: Mayhall, CG, ed. Hospital Epidemiology and Infection Control. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1999:1339–1355.Google Scholar
11.Boyce, JM, Kelliher, S, Vallande, N. Skin irritation and dryness associated with hand-hygiene regimens: soap-and-water hand washing versus hand antisepsis with an alcoholic hand gel. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000; 21:442–448.Google Scholar
12.Pittet, D. Improving compliance with hand hygiene in hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000; 21:381–386.Google Scholar
13.Parienti, JJ, Thibon, P, Heller, R, et al. Hand-rubbing with an aqueous alcoholic solution vs traditional surgical hand-scrubbing and 30-day surgical site infection rates: a randomized equivalence study. JAMA 2002; 288:722–732.Google Scholar
14.Cohen, B, Saiman, L, Cimiotti, J, Larson, E. Factors associated with hand hygiene practices in two neonatal intensive care units. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2003; 22:494–499.Google Scholar
15.Voss, A, Widmer, AF. No time for handwashing!? Handwashing versus alcoholic rub: can we afford 100% compliance? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1997; 18:205–208.Google Scholar
16.Trick, WE, Vernon, MO, Hayes, RA, et al. Impact of ring wearing on hand contamination and comparison of hand hygiene agents in a hospital. Clin Infect Dis 2003; 36:1383–1390.Google Scholar
17.Boyce, JM, Pittet, D. Guideline for Hand Hygiene in Health-Care Settings: recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002; 23(Suppl):S3–S40.Google Scholar
18.Pittet, D, Hugonnet, S, Harbarth, S, et al. Effectiveness of a hospital-wide programme to improve compliance with hand hygiene. Lancet 2000; 356:1307–1312.Google Scholar
19.Salemi, C, Canola, T, Eck, EK. Hand washing and physicians: how to get them together. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002; 23:32–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed