Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T22:25:47.717Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of Manual and Automated Bloodstream Infection Surveillance in Outpatient Dialysis Centers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2016

Nicola D. Thompson ,
Matthew Wise ,
Ruth Belflower ,
Meredith Kanago ,
Marion A. Kainer ,
Chris Lovell  and
Priti R. Patel
Nicola D. Thompson*
Affiliation:
Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
Matthew Wise
Affiliation:
Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
Ruth Belflower
Affiliation:
Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
Meredith Kanago
Affiliation:
Tennessee Department of Health, Emerging Infections Program, Nashville, Tennessee
Marion A. Kainer
Affiliation:
Tennessee Department of Health, Emerging Infections Program, Nashville, Tennessee
Chris Lovell
Affiliation:
Dialysis Clinic, Inc, Nashville, Tennessee.
Priti R. Patel
Affiliation:
Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
*
Address correspondence to Nicola D. Thompson, PhD, MS, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, MS A-16, Atlanta, GA 30333 ([email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Outpatient hemodialysis bloodstream infection rates, now used for performance measurement and were significantly higher for manual compared with automated surveillance (P<.001), largely owing to the absence of blood culture data in the dialysis electronic health record. Improvement in data sharing between hospitals and outpatient dialysis centers is necessary.

Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2016;37(4):472–474

Type
Concise Communications
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 37 , Issue 4 , April 2016 , pp. 472 - 474
Copyright
© 2016 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Presented in part: IDWeek 2014; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; October 11, 2014 (Abstract 1285).

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

References

REFERENCES

1. Patel, PR, Kallen, AJ, Arduino, MJ. Epidemiology, surveillance, and prevention of bloodstream infections in hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 2010;56:566–577.Google Scholar
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Invasive methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections among dialysis patients—United States, 2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2007;56:197–199.Google Scholar
3. Tokars, JI, Richards, C, Andrus, M, et al. The changing face of surveillance for health care–associated infections. Clin Infect Dis 2004;39:1347–1352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. NHSN. Dialysis event surveillance. CDC website. http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/dialysis/dialysis-event.html. Accessed April 7, 2015.Google Scholar
5. Reilly, JB, Marcotte, LM, Berns, JS, Shea, JA. Handoff communication between hospital and outpatient dialysis units at patient discharge: a qualitative study. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2013;39:70–76.Google Scholar
6. The CMO initiative: improving the continuity of care for dialysis patients. Nephrol News Issues website. www.nephrologynews.com/articles/109906-creating-an-open-dialogue-on-improving-dialysis-care. Published January 14, 2014. Accessed April 17, 2015.Google Scholar
7. Nguyen, D, See, I, Gualandi, N, et al. Opportunities to improve completeness of MRSA bloodstream infection reporting from outpatient hemodialysis facilities to the National Healthcare Safety Network. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2015;11:1–3.Google Scholar