Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T21:53:17.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of a telethermographic system for temperature screening at a large tertiary-care referral hospital during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 October 2020

Katherine C. Leach
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, UTHealth McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas
Misti G. Ellsworth
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, UTHealth McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas
Luis Z. Ostrosky
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, UTHealth McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas
Cynthia S. Bell
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, UTHealth McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas
Kathy Masters
Affiliation:
Memorial Hermann Hospital, Texas Medical Center, Houston, Texas
John Calhoun
Affiliation:
Memorial Hermann Hospital, Texas Medical Center, Houston, Texas
Lance Ferguson
Affiliation:
Memorial Hermann Hospital, Texas Medical Center, Houston, Texas
Susie Distefano
Affiliation:
Memorial Hermann Hospital, Texas Medical Center, Houston, Texas
Michael L. Chang*
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, UTHealth McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas
*
Author for correspondence: Michael L. Chang, E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Research Brief
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America

Since the outset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has recommended screening and triage for signs and symptoms of infection for everyone entering a healthcare facility. 1 In compliance, everyone entered our hospital (a tertiary-care referral center in a large metropolitan area) in several single-file lines, and underwent individual symptom screening and temperature check by temporal artery thermometer that required skin contact and cleaning of the probe cone between uses. Despite optimizations, temperature screening resulted in long lines during employee shift changes, which compromised social distancing and exposed screeners to hundreds of individuals in close proximity. During this period, the US Food and Drug Administration issued guidance for initial temperature assessment during a triage process using telethermographic systems (thermal cameras) able to determine surface skin temperature from a distance without skin contact. 2

We sought to determine the feasibility of replacing temporal artery thermometers with a telethermographic system and the impact of such a system on our screening process.

Methods

Temperatures were measured with TAT-2000 and TAT-5000 TemporalScanner thermometers (Exergen Corp, Watertown, MA) and the Athena Elevated Temperature Detection System (Athena Security, Austin, TX). Exergen reports their instruments to be accurate within 0.2°C and 0.1°C, respectively. 3,4 The Athena telethermographic system uses artificial intelligence to detect human faces by measuring the temperature of multiple points on the face relative to a blackbody temperature reference source. 5 According to Athena Security, the system is accurate within 0.3°C. 5 Systems were purchased from Athena Security.

Accepting manufacturer specifications, detecting 0.2°C difference between devices (assuming standard deviation of ±0.3°C) required 26 measurements from each device. One subject was measured 104 times with 4 different TAT-2000s (26 measurements per device) and 104 times with 4 different TAT-5000s (26 measurements per device) by a single operator, and 13 times with the Athena system at a single location within 90 minutes to minimize subject and environmental temperature variation. We repeated measurements with the same subject and thermometer operator at a second location with 3 additional TAT-5000s, 1 TAT-5000 used previously (104 measurements, 26 per device) and a second thermal camera (13 measurements). We simulated fever using air-activated hand warmers (HotHands, Kobayashi Americas, Dalton, GA) held to the forehead. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed with Stata version 15 SE software (StataCorp, College Station, TX). Summaries were reported as means with 95% confidence intervals and differences were tested by 1-way ANOVA. A 2-sided P < .05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Temperature measurement

During the first session, the TAT-2000s measured higher temperatures [mean, 98.3°F (95% CI, 98.2–98.3) or 36.8°C (95% CI, 36.8–36.8)] than the TAT-5000s [mean, 97.8 °F (95% CI, 97.8–97.9) or 36.6°C (95% CI, 36.5–36.6)] or the Athena system [mean, 97.9°F (95% CI, 97.8–98.0) or 36.6°C (95% CI, 36.5–36.7)] (P < .05). There was no significant difference between the TAT-5000s and the Athena system [mean difference, −0.07°F (95% CI, −0.23 to 0.09) or −0.04°C (95% CI, −0.13 to 0.05)], but the TAT-2000s measured temperatures significantly higher than the Athena [mean difference, 0.40°F (95% CI, 0.24–0.56) or 0.22°C (95% CI, 0.13–0.31)]. During the second testing session, the TAT-5000s measured 0.34°F (95% CI, 0.20–0.48) or 0.19°C (95% CI, 0.11–0.26) [mean, 98.1°F (95% CI, 98.1–98.2) or 36.7°C (95% CI, 36.7–36.8)] higher than the Athena system [mean, 97.8°F (95% CI, 97.7–97.9) or 36.6°C (95% CI, 36.5–36.6)] (P < .05).

Fever detection by the Athena system

HotHands warmers reached up to 46.1°C (115°F) 15–30 minutes after activation and were held at the forehead. A “symptomatic” individual in single-file line 6 feet (2 m) between “normal” individuals passing the camera at a rate of 1 individual per second, was detected in 8 of 8 attempts. Additionally, when the forehead was warmed and the warmer then removed, the Athena system was able to detect temperatures of >99°F or 37.2°C (Fig. 1) in 5 of 5 attempts.

Fig. 1. (Top) Initial test run for fever detection by telethermographic system. Individuals passed camera in single-file line at rate of 1 individual per second ~6 feet (~2 m) apart with warmers held to forehead and then removed. In total, 13 tests were then conducted as described. Maximum temperature detected in frame of 105.7°F (40.94°C) identified as a warmer. (Bottom) Facial detection, normal temperature, and location of black body temperature reference within the camera frame.

Screening time

Screeners using TAT-5000s took a median of 16.5 seconds from the start of taking the temperature through cleaning the device until the thermometer was ready again. The Athena system has no effective delay from person to person passing in a single-file line.

Discussion

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to the implementation of temperature screening in a wide variety of facilities. Although temperature screening has been used in public settings during previous infectious diseases outbreaks, Reference Pang, Zhu and Xu6Reference Malone, Brigantic and Muller8 the usefulness of temperature screening to detect potential infections has been questioned. Reference Pang, Zhu and Xu6,7 However, temperature screening may discourage symptomatic individuals from entering public places and may increase comfort for healthy people. Reference Malone, Brigantic and Muller8

Our study using noninvasive devices was not designed to test the accuracy of devices, though temporal scanners are widely considered reliable enough for professional use. Reference Hamilton, Marcos and Secic9,Reference Geijer, Udumyan, Lohse and Nilsgard10 In our use, temperatures measured by telethermographic systems were similar to those obtained by temporal scanners, suggesting similar performance.

Cost is the biggest barrier to implementation for telethermographic systems. For our investment recovery analysis, we considered turnaround time difference between temporal scanners and a thermal camera for each screened individual at a high-entry location with large groups arriving in a short period, desired throughput rate of 1 person per second, maintaining 6-feet (2-m) social distancing and single-file lines for individual symptom screening. We estimated needing 6 temporal scanner operators for every 1 thermal camera operator. With our organization’s direct labor rates and overhead costs, investment recovery was estimated to occur in months, leading to adoption of 4 telethermographic systems at our 2 highest-entry locations. We reduced screening staff from 24 to 4 individuals, and there are now no waiting lines at these locations.

In conclusion, our experience demonstrates that a telethermographic system improves screening throughput and reports temperatures similar to those recorded by temporal scanners, with acceptable investment recovery time.

Acknowledgments

Financial support

No financial support was received from Exergen or Athena Security. Telethermographic systems were purchased at negotiated discounted price from Athena Security.

Conflicts of interest

All authors have no conflicts of interest or financial relationships to disclose relevant to this manuscript.

References

Interim infection prevention and control recommendations for patients with suspected or confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in healthcare settings. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/infection-control-recommendations.html. Published April 13, 2020. Accessed May 5, 2020.Google Scholar
Enforcement policy for telethermographic systems during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) public health emergency: guidance for industry and Food and Drug Administration staff. US Food and Drug Administration website. https://www.fda.gov/media/137079/download. Published April 16, 2020. Accessed May 1, 2020.Google Scholar
TemporalScanner thermometer product data sheet: TAT-2000. Exergen website. https://www.exergen.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/PD-902-EN-V0-Product-Datasheet-TAT-2000.pdf. Published 2019. Accessed April 19, 2020.Google Scholar
TemporalScanner thermometer product data sheet: TAT-5000. Exergen website. https://www.exergen.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/PD-901-EN-V0-Product-Datasheet-TAT-5000.pdf. Published 2019. Accessed April 19, 2020.Google Scholar
Athena’s elevated body temperature system to help catch fevers. Athena Security website. https://athena-security.com/coronavirus-detection. Published 2019. Accessed April 18, 2020.Google Scholar
Pang, X, Zhu, Z, Xu, F et al. Evaluation of control measures implemented in the severe acute respiratory syndrome outbreak in Beijing, 2003. JAMA 2003;290:32153221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell DM and WHO Working Group on Prevention of International and Community Transmission of SARS. Public health interventions and SARS spread, 2003. Emerg Infect Dis 2004;10:19001906.Google Scholar
Malone, JD, Brigantic, R, Muller, GA et al. US airport entry screening in response to pandemic influenza: modeling and analysis. Travel Med Infect Dis 2009;7:181191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, PA, Marcos, LS, Secic, M. Performance of infrared ear and forehead thermometers: a comparative study in 205 febrile and afebrile children. J Clin Nurs 2013;22:25092518.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geijer, H, Udumyan, R, Lohse, G, Nilsgard, Y. Temperature measurements with a temporal scanner: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2016;6:e009509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1. (Top) Initial test run for fever detection by telethermographic system. Individuals passed camera in single-file line at rate of 1 individual per second ~6 feet (~2 m) apart with warmers held to forehead and then removed. In total, 13 tests were then conducted as described. Maximum temperature detected in frame of 105.7°F (40.94°C) identified as a warmer. (Bottom) Facial detection, normal temperature, and location of black body temperature reference within the camera frame.