Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:09:46.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Electronic Recognition of Hand Hygiene Technique and Duration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2016

Valerie Galluzzi
Affiliation:
Department of Computer Science, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
Ted Herman
Affiliation:
Department of Computer Science, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
D. J. Shumaker
Affiliation:
GOJO Industries, Akron, Ohio
D. R. Macinga
Affiliation:
GOJO Industries, Akron, Ohio
J. W. Arbogast
Affiliation:
GOJO Industries, Akron, Ohio
Elena M. Segre
Affiliation:
Department of Health and Human Physiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
Alberto M. Segre
Affiliation:
Department of Computer Science, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
Philip M. Polgreen*
Affiliation:
Departments of Internal Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
*
MPH, Carver College of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242 ([email protected]).

Abstract

We captured 3-dimensional accelerometry data from the wrists of 116 healthcare professionals as they performed hand hygiene (HH). We then used these data to train a k-nearest-neighbors classifier to recognize specific aspects of HH technique (ie, fingertip scrub) and measure the duration of HH events.

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2014;35(10):1298–1300

Type
Concise Communication
Copyright
© 2014 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care. Geneva: WHO, 2009. http://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/documents/s16320e/s16320e.pdf. Accessed February 4, 2013.Google Scholar
2. Widmer, AE, Dangel, M. Alcohol-based handrub: evaluation of technique and microbiological efficacy with international infection control professionals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2004;25(3):207209.Google Scholar
3. Widmer, AF, Conzelmann, M, Tomic, M, Frei, R, Stranden, AM. Introducing alcohol-based hand rub for hand hygiene: the critical need for training. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007;28:5054.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Tschudin Sutter, S, Frei, R, Dangel, M, Widmer, AF. Effect of teaching recommended World Health Organization technique on the use of alcohol-based hand rub by medical students. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31(11):11941195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Szilágyi, L, Haidegger, T, Lehotsky, A, et al. A large-scale assessment of hand hygiene quality and the effectiveness of the “WHO 6-steps.” BMC Infect Dis 2013;13:249.Google Scholar
6. Duda, RO, Hart, PE, Stork, DG. Pattern Classification. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Wiley Interscience, 2009.Google Scholar
7. Kampf, G, Reichel, M, Feil, Y, Eggerstedt, S, Kaulfers, PM. Influence of rub-in technique on required application time and hand coverage in hygienic hand disinfection. BMC Infect Dis 2008;8:149.6.Google Scholar
8. Chow, A, Arah, OA, Chan, SP, et al. Alcohol handrubbing and chlorhexidine handwashing protocols for routine hospital practice: a randomized clinical trial of protocol efficacy and time effectiveness. Am J Infect Control 2012;40(9):800805.Google Scholar
9. Macinga, DR, Edmonds, SL, Campbell, E, Shumaker, DJ, Arbogast, JW. Efficacy of novel alcohol-based hand rub products at typical in-use volumes. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013;34(3):299301.Google Scholar
10. Llorca, DF, Parra, I, Sotelo, , Lacey, G. A vision-based system for automatic hand washing quality assessment. Mach Vis Appl 2011;22(2):219234.Google Scholar