Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T06:48:55.051Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Electronic Medical Records: Unintended Consequences of a Duplicitous Default Setting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Tariq Iqbal  and
Edward C. Oldfield III
Tariq Iqbal*
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia
Edward C. Oldfield III
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia
*
Eastern Virginia Medical School, 825 Fairfax Avenue, Suite 410, Norfolk, VA 23507 (bluestarl23@ gmail.com)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Letters to the Editor
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 31 , Issue 11 , November 2010 , pp. 1198 - 1199
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2010

References

1.Weinstein, MP, Relier, LB, Murphy, JR, Lichtenstein, KA. The clinical significance of positive blood cultures: a comprehensive analysis of 500 episodes of bacteremia and fungemia in adults. I. Laboratory and epidemiologic observations. Rev Infect Dis 1983;5:35–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Cockerill, FR III, Wilson, JW, Vetter, EA, et al.Optimal testing parameters for blood cultures. Clin Infect Dis 2004;38:1724–1730.Google Scholar
3.Weinstein, MP, Towns, ML, Quartey, SM, et al.The clinical significance of positive blood cultures in the 1990s: a prospective comprehensive evaluation of the microbiology, epidemiology, and outcome of bacteremia and fungemia in adults. Clin Infect Dis 1997;24:584–602.Google Scholar
4.MacGregor, RR, Beaty, HN. Evaluation of positive blood cultures: guidelines for early differentiation of contaminated from valid positive cultures. Arch Intern Med 1972;130:84–87.Google Scholar
5.Schifman, RB, Strand, CL, Meier, FA, Howanitz, PJ. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1998;122(3):216–221.Google Scholar
6.Aronson, MD, Bor, DH. Blood cultures. Ann Intern Med 1987;106:246–253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Reimer, LG, Weinstein, MP, Wilson, ML. Update on the detection of bacteremia and fungemia. Clin Microbiol Rev 1997;10:444–465.Google Scholar
8.Weinstein, MP. Current blood culture methods and systems: clinical concepts, technology, and interpretation of results. Clin Infect Dis 1996;23:40–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed