Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:25:14.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Device-Associated Nosocomial Infection Rates in Turkish Medical-Surgical Intensive Care Units

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Dilara Inan*
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, University of Akdeniz, Antalya, Turkey
Rabin Saba
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, University of Akdeniz, Antalya, Turkey
Ata Nevzat Yalcin
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, University of Akdeniz, Antalya, Turkey
Murat Yilmaz
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Akdeniz, Antalya, Turkey
Gozde Ongut
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Akdeniz, Antalya, Turkey
Atilla Ramazanoglu
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Akdeniz, Antalya, Turkey
Latife Mamikoglu
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, University of Akdeniz, Antalya, Turkey
*
Akdeniz Universitesi, Tip Fakultesi, Infeksiyon Hastaliklari AD, 07050, Antalya, Turkey ([email protected])

Abstract

Objective.

To describe the incidence of device-associated nosocomial infections in medical-surgical intensive care units (MS ICUs) in a university hospital in Turkey and compare it with National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) system rates.

Design.

Prospective surveillance study during a period of 27 months. Device utilization ratios and device-associated infection rates were calculated using US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and NNIS definitions.

Setting.

Two separate MS ICUs at Akdeniz University Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.

Patients.

All patients were included who presented with no signs and symptoms of infection within the first 48 hours after admission.

Results.

Data on 1,985 patients with a total of 16,892 patient-days were analyzed. The mean overall infection rate per 100 patients was 29.1 infections, and the mean infection rate per 1,000 patient-days was 34.2 infections. The rate of ventilator-associated pneumonia was 20.76 infections per 1,000 ventilator-days, the rate of catheter-associated urinary tract infection was 13.63 infections per 1,000 urinary catheter–days, and the rate of catheter-associated bloodstream infection was 9.69 infections per 1,000 central line–days. The most frequently isolated pathogens were Pseudomonas species among patients with ventilator-associated pneumonias (35.8% of cases), Candida species among patients with catheter-associated urinary tract infections (37.1% of cases), and coagulase-negative staphylococci among patients with catheter-associated bloodstream infections (20.0% of cases).

Conclusion.

We found both higher device-associated infection rates and higher device utilization ratios in our MS ICUs than those reported by the NNIS system. To reduce the rate of infection, implementation of infection control practices and comprehensive education are required, and an appropriate nationwide nosocomial infection and control system is needed in Turkey.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Haley, RW, Culver, DH, White, JW, et al. The efficacy of infection surveillance and control programs in preventing nosocomial infections in US hospitals. Am J Epidemiol 1985; 121:182205.Google Scholar
2.Jarvis, WR, Edwards, JR, Culver, DH, et al. Nosocomial infection rates in adult and pediatric intensive care units in the United States. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. Am J Med 1991; 91(Suppl 3B):185S191S.Google Scholar
3.Garner, JS, Jarvis, WR, Emori, TG, Horan, TC, Hughes, JM. CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988. Am J Infect Control 1988; 16:128140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Cetinkaya, Y, Arikan Akan, O, Ozgultekin, A, et al. Nosocomial infection rates in Turkey: benchmark with NNIS. In: Program and abstracts of the 14th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America; April 17-20, 2004; Philadelphia, PA. Abstract P132.Google Scholar
5.National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System. NNIS System Report, data summary from January 1992 through June 2003, issued August 2003. Am J Infect Control 2003; 31:481498.Google Scholar
6.Richards, MJ, Edwards, JR, Culver, DH, Gaynes, RP. Nosocomial infections in combined medical-surgical intensive care units in the United States. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000; 21:510515.Google Scholar
7.Fridkin, SA, Pear, SM, Williamson, TH, Galgiani, JN, Jarwis, WR. The role of understaffing in central venous catheter–associated bloodstream infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1996; 17:150158.Google Scholar
8.Harbarth, S, Sudre, P, Dharan, S, Cadenas, M, Pittet, D. Outbreak of Enterobacter cloacae related to understaffing, overcrowding, and poor hygiene practices. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999; 20:598603.Google Scholar
9.Velasco, E, Thuler, LC, Martins, CA, Dias, LM, Gonçalves, VC. Nosocomial infections in an oncology intensive care unit. Am J Infect Control 1997; 26:458462.Google Scholar
10.Khuri-Bulos, NA, Shennak, M, Agabi, S, et al. Nosocomial infections in the intensive care units at a university hospital in a developing country: comparison with National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance intensive care unit rates. Am J Infect Control 1999; 27:547552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Rosenthal, VD, Guzman, S, Orellano, PW. Nosocomial infections in medical-surgical intensive care units in Argentina: attributable mortality and length of stay. Am J Infect Control 2003; 31:291295.Google Scholar
12.Gastmeier, P, Geffers, C, Sohr, D, Dettenkofer, M, Daschner, F, Rüden, H. Five years working with the German Nosocomial Infection Surveillance System (Krankenhaus Infektions Surveillance System). Am J Infect Control 2003; 31:316321.Google Scholar
13.McKinley, LL, Moriarty, HJ, Short, TH, Johnson, CC. Effect of comparative data feedback on intensive care unit infection rates in a Veterans Administration Hospital Network System. Am J Infect Control 2003; 31:397404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar