Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T02:55:31.017Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Colonization of Personal Digital Assistants Carried by Healthcare Professionals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Ali Hassoun
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, New York
Ernestine M. Vellozzi
Affiliation:
Division of Microbiology, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, New York
Miriam A. Smith*
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, New York
*
Division of Infectious Diseases—Staff House Room 226, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, 270-05 76th Avenue, New Hyde Park, NY 11040

Abstract

This study evaluated personal digital assistant (PDA) microbial colonization before and after cleaning with alcohol. Samples from 75 PDAs were processed. Before cleaning, 96% of the samples were culture positive. After cleaning, 75% became culture negative. PDAs cleaned with an alcohol swab demonstrated significant reduction in colonization.

Type
Concise Communications
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Weinstein, RA. Nosocomial infection update. Emerg Infect Dis 1998:4:416420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System report: data summary from January through June 2003. Am J Infect Control 2003;31:481498.Google Scholar
3. Breathnach, AS, Jenkins, DR, Pedler, SJ. Stethoscopes as possible vectors of infection by staphylococci. BMJ 1992;305:15731574.Google ScholarPubMed
4. Bernard, L, Kereveur, A, Durand, D, et al. Bacterial contamination of hospital physicians' stethoscopes. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999;20:626628.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Smith, MA, Mathewson, JJ, Ulert, A, Scerpella, EG, Ericsson, CD. Contaminated stethoscopes revisited. Arch Intern Med 1996;156:8284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Marinella, MA, Pierson, C, Chenoweth, C. The stethoscope: a potential source of nosocomial infection. Arch Intern Med 1997;157:786790.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Livornese, LL, Dias, S, Samel, C, et al. Hospital acquired infection with vancomycin resistant Enterococcus faecium transmitted by electronic thermometers. Ann Intern Med 1992;117:112116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Zachary, KC, Bayne, MS, Morrison, VJ, Ford, DS, Silver, LC, Hooper, DC. Contamination of gowns, gloves, and stethoscopes with vancomycin resistant enterococci. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2001;22:560564.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility, ed. 8. Wayne, PA: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 2003. Approved standard M2-A8.Google Scholar
10. Singh, D, Kaur, H, Gardner, W, Treen, L. Bacterial contamination of hospital pagers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002;23:274276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Braddy, C, Rady, M, Blair, J. Colonization of personal digital assistants (PDAs) used in a healthcare setting: what's growing on your palm? Presented at the 14th Annual Meeting of the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America; April 17-20,2004; Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar