Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T10:08:41.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Clamping Down on Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Karl Wittnebel  and
Mark J. Ault
Karl Wittnebel*
Affiliation:
Department of General Internal Medicine, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
Mark J. Ault
Affiliation:
Department of General Internal Medicine, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
*
Department of General Internal Medicine, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Becker 113, Los Angeles, CA 90016 ([email protected])
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Letters to the Editor
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , March 2011 , pp. 299 - 301
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2011

References

1.Benson, JS. FDA safety alert: needlestick and other risks from hypodermic needles on secondary I.V. administration sets—piggyback and intermittent I.VXSS Food and Drug Administration. Rock-ville, MD: Public Health Service, 1992. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/PublicHealthNotifications/ucm063115.pdf. Accessed October 8, 2010.Google Scholar
2.US Congress. Needlestick safety and prevention act. HR 5178. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 2000. http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname =106_cong_public_laws&docid = f:publ430.106.Google Scholar
3.Rupp, M, Sholtz, L, Jourdan, D, et al.Outbreak of bloodstream infection temporally associated with the use of an intravascular needleless valve. Clin Infect Dis 2007;44:1408–1414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Field, K, McFarlane, C, Cheng, A, et al.Incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection among patients with a needleless, mechanical valve-based intravenous connector in an Australian hematology-oncology unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007;28:610–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Maki, DG, Kluger, DM, Crnich, CJ. The risk of bloodstream infection in adults. Mayo Clin Proc 2006;81(9):1159–1171.Google Scholar
6.Maragakis, L, Bradley, K, Song, X, et al.Increased catheter-related bloodstream infection rates after the introduction of a new mechanical valve intravenous access port. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006;27:67–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Toscano, CM, Bell, M, Zukerman, C. Gram-negative bloodstream infections in hematopoetic stem cell transplant patients: the roles of needleless device use, bathing practices, and catheter care. Am J Infect Control 2009;37(4):327–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Saigado, CD, Chinnes, L, Paczesny, TH, Cantey, JR. Increased rate of catheter-related bloodstream infection associated with use of a needleless mechanical valve device at a long-term acute care hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007;28:684–688.Google Scholar
9.Ryder, M, Fisher, S, Hamilton, G, et al.Bacterial transfer through needlefree connectors: comparison of nine different devices. In: Program and abstracts of the 17th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America; April 14-17, 2007; Baltimore, MD, 2007. Abstract 210.Google Scholar
10.Menyhay, SZ, Maki, DG. Disinfection of needleless catheter connectors and access ports with alcohol may not prevent microbial entry: the promise of a novel antiseptic-barrier cap. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006;27:23–27.Google Scholar