Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T16:52:24.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Central Venous Catheter–Related Infection: A Prospective, Observational Study to Assess the Incidence Rate at a Teaching Hospital in Argentina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Carlos Bantar ,
José Luis Bustos ,
Eduardo Vesco ,
Graciana Morera  and
The Residence of Internal Program
Carlos Bantar*
Affiliation:
Committee for Prevention and Control of Nosocomial Infections, Hospital San Martín, Paraná, Entre Ríos, Argentina
José Luis Bustos
Affiliation:
Committee for Prevention and Control of Nosocomial Infections, Hospital San Martín, Paraná, Entre Ríos, Argentina
Eduardo Vesco
Affiliation:
Committee for Prevention and Control of Nosocomial Infections, Hospital San Martín, Paraná, Entre Ríos, Argentina
Graciana Morera
Affiliation:
Committee for Prevention and Control of Nosocomial Infections, Hospital San Martín, Paraná, Entre Ríos, Argentina
*
Colón 128, (3100) Paraná, Entre Ríos, Argentina
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

One hundred fifty-one central venous catheters (CVCs) were observed for development of infection. The infection rate was higher for CVCs with a duration of less than 6 days than for those with a longer duration. Our data suggest that scheduled replacement of CVCs is not necessary.

Type
Concise Communication
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 23 , Issue 12 , December 2002 , pp. 757 - 758
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Richards, MJ, Edwards, JR, Culver, DH, Gaynes, RP. Nosocomial infections in medical intensive care units in the United States: National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. Crit Care Med 1999:27:887–892.Google Scholar
2.Byers, KE, Adal, KA, Anglim, AM, Farr, BM. Case fatality rate for catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRSBI): a meta-analysis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1995;16:23. Abstract.Google Scholar
3.Ullman, RE, Gurevich, I, Schoch, PE, Cunha, BA. Colonization and bacteremia related to duration of triple-lumen intravascular catheter placement. Am J Infect Control 1990;18:201–207.Google Scholar
4.Souweine, B, Traore, O, Aublet-Cuveilier, B, et al. Dialysis and central venous catheter infections in critically ill patients: results of a prospective study. Crit Care Med 1999;27:2394–2398.Google Scholar
5.Mermel, LA, Farr, BM, Sherertz, RJ, et al. Guidelines for the management of intravascular catheter-related infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2001;22:222–242.Google Scholar
6.Bustos, J, Vesco, E, Tosello, C, et al. Alarming baseline rates of nosocomial infection and surgical prophylaxis errors in a small teaching hospital from Argentina. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2001;22:264–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.O'Grady, NP. Applying the science to the prevention of catheter-related infections. J Crit Care 2002;17:114–121.Google Scholar
8.Timsit, JF. Scheduled replacement of central venous catheters is not necessary. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000;21:371–374.Google Scholar
9.Eyer, S, Brumitt, C, Crossley, K, Siegel, R, Cerra, F. Catheter related sepsis: a prospective randomized study of three methods of catheter maintenance. Crit Care Med 1990;18:1073–1079.Google Scholar
10.Cobb, DK, High, KP, Sawyer, RG, et al. A controlled trial of schedule replacement of central venous and pulmonary-artery catheters. N Engl J Med 1992;327:1062–1068.Google Scholar
11.Badley, AD, Steckelberg, JM, Wollan, PC, Thompson, RL. Infectious rates of central venous pressure catheters: comparison between newly placed catheter and those that have been changed. Mayo Clin Proc 1996;71:838–846.Google Scholar