Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:05:18.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Can Additional Information Be Obtained from Claims Data to Support Surgical Site Infection Diagnosis Codes?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2016

David K. Warren ,
Katelin B. Nickel ,
Anna E. Wallace ,
Daniel Mines ,
Victoria J. Fraser  and
Margaret A. Olsen
David K. Warren
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
Katelin B. Nickel
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
Anna E. Wallace
Affiliation:
HealthCore, Wilmington, Delaware
Daniel Mines
Affiliation:
HealthCore, Wilmington, Delaware
Victoria J. Fraser
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
Margaret A. Olsen
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective.

International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnosis codes are increasingly used to identify healthcare-associated infections, often with insufficient evidence demonstrating validity of the codes used. Absent medical record verification, we sought to confirm a claims algorithm to identify surgical site infections (SSIs) by examining the presence of clinically expected SSI treatment.

Methods.

We performed a retrospective cohort study, using private insurer claims data from persons less than 65 years old with ICD-9-CM procedure or Current Procedure Terminology (CPT-4) codes for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction from January 2004 through December 2010. SSIs occurring within 90 days after ACL reconstruction were identified by ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes. Antibiotic utilization, surgical treatment, and microbiology culture claims within 14 days of SSI codes were used as evidence to support the SSI diagnosis.

Results.

Of 40,702 procedures, 401 (1.0%) were complicated by SSI, 172 (0.4%) of which were specifically identified as septic arthritis. Most SSIs were associated with an inpatient admission (232/401 [58%]), and/or surgical procedure(s) for treatment (250/401 [62%]). Temporally associated antibiotics, surgical treatment procedures, and cultures were present for 84% (338/401), 61% (246/401), and 59% (238/401), respectively. Only 5.7% (23/401) of procedures coded for SSI after the procedure had no antibiotics, surgical treatments, or cultures within 14 days of the SSI claims.

Conclusions.

More than 94% of patients identified by our claims algorithm as having an SSI received clinically expected treatment for infection, including antibiotics, surgical treatment, and culture, suggesting that this algorithm has very good positive predictive value. This method may facilitate retrospective SSI surveillance and comparison of SSI rates across facilities and providers.

Type
Original Article
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 35 , Issue S3: Preventing Healthcare–Associated Infections: Results and Lessons Learned from AHRQ's HAI Program , October 2014 , pp. S124 - S132
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2014

References

1. Yokoe, DS, Noskin, GA, Cunningham, SM, et al. Enhanced identification of postoperative infections among inpatients. Emerg Infect Dis 2004;10(11):1924–1930.Google Scholar
2. Bolon, MK, Hooper, D, Stevenson, KB, et al. Improved surveillance for surgical site infections after orthopedic implantation procedures: extending applications for automated data. Clin Infect Dis 2009;48(9):1223–1229.Google Scholar
3. Olsen, MA, Fraser, VJ. Use of diagnosis codes and/or wound culture results for surveillance of surgical site infection after mastectomy and breast reconstruction. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31(5):544–547.Google Scholar
4. West, J, Khan, Y, Murray, DM, Stevenson, KB. Assessing specific secondary ICD-9-CM codes as potential predictors of surgical site infections. Am J Infect Control 2010;38(9):701–705.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Calderwood, MS, Ma, A, Khan, YM, et al. Use of Medicare diagnosis and procedure codes to improve detection of surgical site infections following hip arthroplasty, knee arthroplasty, and vascular surgery. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2012;33(1):40–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Hollenbeak, CS, Boltz, MM, Nikkel, LE, Schaefer, E, Ortenzi, G, Dillon, PW. Electronic measures of surgical site infection: implications for estimating risks and costs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011;32(8):784–790.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Lawson, EH, Louie, R, Zingmond, DS, et al. A comparison of clinical registry versus administrative claims data for reporting of 30-day surgical complications. Ann Surg 2012;256(6):973–981.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Yokoe, DS, Khan, Y, Olsen, MA, et al. Enhanced surgical site infection surveillance following hysterectomy, vascular, and co-lorectal surgery. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2012;33(8):768–773.Google Scholar
9. Julian, KG, Brumbach, AM, Chicora, MK, et al. First year of mandatory reporting of healthcare-associated infections, Pennsylvania: an infection control-chart abstractor collaboration. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006;27(9):926–930.Google Scholar
10. Stevenson, KB, Khan, Y, Dickman, J, et al. Administrative coding data, compared with CDC/NHSN criteria, are poor indicators of health care-associated infections. Am J Infect Control 2008; 36(3):155–164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Van Tongel, A., Stuyck, J, Bellemans, J, Vandenneucker, H. Septic arthritis after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a retrospective analysis of incidence, management and outcome. Am J Sports Med 2007;35(7):1059–1063.Google Scholar
12. Schollin-Borg, M, Michaëlsson, K, Rahme, H. Presentation, outcome, and cause of septic arthritis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a case control study. Arthroscopy 2003; 19(9):941–947.Google Scholar
13. Judd, D, Bottoni, C, Kim, D, Burke, M, Hooker, S. Infections following arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2006;22(4):375–384.Google Scholar
14. Indelli, PF, Dillingham, M, Fanton, G, Schurman, DJ. Septic arthritis in postoperative anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002;398:182–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Abdel-Aziz, A, Radwan, YA, Rizk, A. Multiple arthroscopic de-bridement and graft retention in septic knee arthritis after ACL reconstruction: a prospective case-control study. Int Orthop 2014;38(1):73–82.Google Scholar
16. Benner, RW, Shelbourne, KD, Freeman, H. Infections and patellar tendon ruptures after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of ipsilateral and contralateral patellar tendon autografts. Am J Sports Med 2011;39(3):519–525.Google Scholar
17. Binnet, MS, Başarir, K. Risk and outcome of infection after different arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques. Arthroscopy 2007;23(8):862–868.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Burks, RT, Friederichs, MG, Fink, B, Luker, MG, West, HS, Greis, PE. Treatment of postoperative anterior cruciate ligament infections with graft removal and early reimplantation. Am J Sports Med 2003;31(3):414–418.Google Scholar
19. Fong, SY, Tan, JL. Septic arthritis after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Ann AcadMed Singap 2004;33(2): 228–234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Jameson, SS, Dowen, D, James, P, Serrano-Pedraza, I, Reed, MR, Deehan, D. Complications following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the English NHS. Knee 2012;19(1):14–19.Google Scholar
21. Maletis, GB, Inacio, MC, Funahashi, TT. Analysis of 16,192 anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions from a community-based registry. Am J Sports Med 2013;41(9):2090–2098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Sechriest, VF II, Carney, JR, Kuskowski, MA, Haffner, JL, Mullen, MJ, Covey, DC. Incidence of knee sepsis after ACL reconstruction at one institution: the impact of a clinical pathway. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013;95(9):843–846.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. Viola, R, Marzano, N, Vianello, R. An unusual epidemic of Staph-ylococcus-negative infections involving anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with salvage of the graft and function. Arthroscopy 2000;16(2):173–177.Google Scholar
24. Wang, C, Ao, Y, Wang, J, Hu, Y, Cui, G, Yu, J. Septic arthritis after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a retrospective analysis of incidence, presentation, treatment, and cause. Arthroscopy 2009;25(3):243–249.Google Scholar
25. Williams, RJ III, Laurencin, CT, Warren, RF, Speciale, AC, Brause, BD, O'Brien, S. Septic arthritis after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: diagnosis and management. Am J Sports Med 1997;25(2):261–267.Google Scholar
26. Schub, DL, Schmitz, LM, Sakamoto, FA, Winalski, CS, Parker, RD. Long-term outcomes of postoperative septic arthritis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2012; 40(12):2764–2770.Google Scholar
27. Mouzopoulos, G, Fotopoulos, VC, Tzurbakis, M. Septic knee arthritis following ACL reconstruction: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrose 2009;17(9):1033–1042.Google Scholar
28. Scully, WF, Fisher, SG, Parada, SA, Arrington, EA. Septic arthritis following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comprehensive review of the literature. J Surg Orthop Adv 2013;22(2): 127–133.Google Scholar
29. Sands, K, Vineyard, G, Platt, R. Surgical site infections occurring after hospital discharge. J Infect Dis 1996;173(4):963–970.Google Scholar
30. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Health-care Safety Network (NHSN) procedure-associated (PA) module: surgical site infection (SSI) event, http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/PDFs/pscManual/9pscSSIcurrent.pdf. Accessed November 14, 2013.Google Scholar
31. Li, X, King, C, deGara, C, White, J, Winget, M. Validation of colorectal cancer surgery data from administrative data sources. BMC Med Res Methodol 2012;12:97.Google Scholar
32. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Global surgery fact sheet. http://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare -Learning-Network-MLN/MLNProducts/downloads/GloballSurgery-ICN907166.pdf. Published August 2013. Accessed November 14, 2013.Google Scholar