Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T08:47:42.571Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Attitudes, Practices, and Infection Risks of Hemophilia Treatment Center Nurses Who Teach Infection Control for the Home

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Mark N. Lobato ,
Judith Hannan ,
R.J. Simonds ,
Brenda Riske  and
Bruce L. Evatt
Mark N. Lobato
Affiliation:
Division of HIV/AIDS, the National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
Judith Hannan
Affiliation:
Division of HIV/AIDS, the National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
R.J. Simonds
Affiliation:
Division of HIV/AIDS, the National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
Brenda Riske
Affiliation:
National Hemophilia Foundation Nursing Committee, New York, New York
Bruce L. Evatt*
Affiliation:
Division of HIV/AIDS, the National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
*
Division of HIV/AIDS, MS E-64, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA 30333
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To examine the practices toward infection control training and to assess the attitudes about, and risks for, exposures to blood among hemophilia treatment center (HTC) nurses who teach home infusion therapy (HIT).

Design and Population:

Written and telephone interview surveys of the 153 nurses who teach HIT at federally funded HTCs.

Main Outcome Measures:

Hemophilia treatment center nurses' teaching practices and infection control messages taught, and frequency of exposures to blood.

Results:

The response rate to the written nurses' survey was 60% and to the telephone interview 88%. Nurses taught patients a median of three HIT sessions totaling 4 hours of instruction. Reevaluation of patients' HIT practices took place every 6 months by 22% and every 12 months by 59% of nurses. Nurses frequently reported teaching proper use of a sharps disposal container (99%) and gloves (93%), but less often reported teaching patients to wash hands after infusions (26%) and to report needlestick injuries to HTCs (11%). The respondents identified several barriers to effective infection control as it is practiced in the home by patients. Although at least 30% of HTC nurses recalled having had percutaneous exposure to blood, they considered their risk for hepatitis B infection low but greater than for infection with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).

Conclusions:

While some important infection control messages are stressed during HIT teaching, others may be underemphasized. Failure to instruct patients about all infection control precautions may be related to nurse educators' perception of low to moderate personal risk for hepatitis B and HIV infection. Patients receiving HIT, and those who assist them, need to be fully aware of, and to have reinforced periodically, universal infection control strategies in the home.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 17 , Issue 11 , November 1996 , pp. 726 - 731
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Smith, PS, Levine, PH. The benefits of comprehensive care of hemophilia: a five-year study of outcomes. Am J Public Health 1984;74:616–617.Google Scholar
2. Grint, P, McEvoy, M. Two associated cases of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). Commun Dis Rep 1985;42:4.Google Scholar
3. Centers for Disease Control. Apparent transmission of human T-lymphocyte virus type III/lymphadenopathy-associated virus from a child to a mother providing health care. MMWR 1986;35:76–79.Google Scholar
4. Centers for Disease Control. HIV infection in two brothers receiving intravenous therapy for hemophilia. MMWR 1992;41:228–231.Google Scholar
5. Fitzgibbon, JE, Gaur, S, Frenkel, LD, Laraque, F, Edlin, BR, Dubin, DT. Transmission from one child to another of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 with a zidovudine resistance mutation. N Engl J Med 1993;329:1835–1841.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV transmission between two adolescent brothers with hemophilia. MMWR 1993;42:948–951.Google Scholar
7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Human immunodeficiency virus transmission in household settings. MMWR 1994;43:347–351.Google Scholar
8. Lobato, MN, Oxtoby, MJ, Augustyniak, L, Caldwell, MB, Wiley, SD, Simonds, RJ. Infection control practices in the home: a survey of households of HIV-infected persons with hemophilia. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1996;17:721–725.Google Scholar
9. Centers for Disease Control. Universal precautions for prevention of transmission of HIV, hepatitis B virus, and other blood-borne pathogens in health-care settings. MMWR 1988;37:377–382,387-388.Google Scholar
10. Wiley, S, Hannan, J, Barrett, S, Evatt, B. Surveillance of hemophilia, HIV, and HIV risk reduction at federally funded hemophilia treatment centers, 1990 through 1993. Transfusion 1995;35:444. Proceedings of the National Hemophilia Foundation Annual Meeting; October 27-30, 1994; Dallas, TX. Abstract.Google Scholar
11. Centers for Disease Control. Summary Analysis of the 1992 Hemophilia Minimal Data Set for Risk Reduction. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control; 1992.Google Scholar
12. Fricke, W, Augustyniak, L, Lawrence, D, Brownstein, A, Kramer, A, Evatt, B. Human immunodeficiency virus infection due to clotting factor concentrates: results of the Seroconversion Surveillance Project. Transfusion 1992;32:707–709.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Epstein, JS, Fricke, WA. Current safety of clotting factor concentrates. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1990;114:335–360.Google Scholar
14. Schillo, BA, Reischl, TM. HIV-related knowledge and precautions among Michigan nurses. Am J Public Health 1993;83:1438–1442.Google Scholar
15. van Servellen, GM, Lewis, CE, Leake, B. Nurses' responses to the AIDS crisis: implications for continuing education programs. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing 1988;19:4–8.Google Scholar
16. Linnemann, CC Jr, Cannon, C, DeRonde, M, Lanphear, BP. Effect of educational programs, rigid sharps containers, and universal precautions on reported needlestick injuries in health care workers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1991;12:214–219.Google Scholar
17. Short, L, Chamberland, M, Culver, D, et al. Underreporting of needlestick injuries among health-care workers (HCWs). Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1994;15(suppl):P20. Abstract 1.Google Scholar
18. Janssen, RS, St Louis, ME, Satten, GA, et al. HIV infection among patients in US acute care hospitals. N Engl J Med 1992;327:445–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Marcus, R, Culver, DH, Bell, DM, et al. Risk of human immunodeficiency virus infection among emergency department workers. Am J Med 1993;94:363–370.Google Scholar
20. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Update: provisional Public Health Service recommendations for chemoprophylaxis after occupational exposure to HIV. MMWR 1996;45:468–472.Google Scholar