Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T09:11:55.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessing the Ability of Hospital Diagnosis Codes to Detect Inpatient Exposure to Antibacterial Agents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 February 2018

Michael J. Ray ,
William E. Trick  and
Michael Y. Lin
Michael J. Ray*
Affiliation:
Cook County Health and Hospitals System, Chicago, Illinois
William E. Trick*
Affiliation:
Cook County Health and Hospitals System, Chicago, Illinois Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
Michael Y. Lin
Affiliation:
Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
*
Address correspondence to Michael J. Ray, MPH, 1900 West Polk Street, Suite 1611, Chicago, Illinois 60612 ([email protected]) or William E. Trick, MD, 1900 West Polk Street, Suite 1600, Chicago, Illinois 60612 ([email protected]).
Address correspondence to Michael J. Ray, MPH, 1900 West Polk Street, Suite 1611, Chicago, Illinois 60612 ([email protected]) or William E. Trick, MD, 1900 West Polk Street, Suite 1600, Chicago, Illinois 60612 ([email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Because antibacterial history is difficult to obtain, especially when the exposure occurred at an outside hospital, we assessed whether infection-related diagnostic billing codes, which are more readily available through hospital discharge databases, could infer prior antibacterial receipt.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

This study included 121,916 hospitalizations representing 78,094 patients across the 3 hospitals.

METHODS

We obtained hospital inpatient data from 3 Chicago-area hospitals. Encounters were categorized as “infection” if at least 1 International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) code indicated a bacterial infection. From medication administration records, we categorized antibacterial agents and calculated total therapy days using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) definitions. We evaluated bivariate associations between infection encounters and 3 categories of antibacterial exposure: any, broad spectrum, or surgical prophylaxis. We constructed multivariable models to evaluate adjusted risk ratios for antibacterial receipt.

RESULTS

Of the 121,916 inpatient encounters (78,094 patients) across the 3 hospitals, 24% had an associated infection code, 47% received an antibacterial, and 13% received a broad-spectrum antibacterial. Infection-related ICD-9-CM codes were associated with a 2-fold increase in antibacterial administration compared to those lacking such codes (RR, 2.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.27–2.31) and a 5-fold increased risk for broad-spectrum antibacterial administration (RR, 5.52; 95% CI, 5.37–5.67). Encounters with infection codes had 3 times the number of antibacterial days.

CONCLUSIONS

Infection diagnostic billing codes are strong surrogate markers for prior antibacterial exposure, especially to broad-spectrum antibacterial agents; such an association can be used to enhance early identification of patients at risk of multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) carriage at the time of admission.

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;39:377–382

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 39 , Issue 4 , April 2018 , pp. 377 - 382
Copyright
© 2018 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

PREVIOUS PRESENTATION. This manuscript was presented in part at the Society of Healthcare Epidemiology of America Spring 2017 Conference on March 31, 2017, in St Louis, Missouri.

References

REFERENCES

1. Morgan, DJ, Day, HR, Furuno, JP, et al. Improving efficiency in active surveillance for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus at hospital admission. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31:1230–1235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. McKinnell, JA, Miller, LG, Eells, SJ, Cui, E, Huang, SS. A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of factors associated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization at time of hospital or intensive care unit admission. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013;34:1077–1086.Google Scholar
3. Marchaim, D, Gottesman, T, Schwartz, O, et al. National multicenter study of predictors and outcomes of bacteremia upon hospital admission caused by Enterobacteriaceae producing extended-spectrum β-lactamases. Antimicrob Agent Chemother 2010;54:5099–5104.Google Scholar
4. Tumbarello, M, Trecarichi, EM, Bassetti, M, et al. Identifying patients harboring extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae on hospital admission: derivation and validation of a scoring system. Antimicrob Agent Chemother 2011;55:3485–3490.Google Scholar
5. Harris, AD, McGregor, JC, Johnson, JA, et al. Risk factors for colonization with extended-spectrum β-lactamase–producing bacteria and intensive care unit admission. Emerg Infect Dis 2007;13:1144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Papadimitriou-Olivgeris, M, Marangos, M, Fligou, F, et al. Risk factors for KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae enteric colonization upon ICU admission. J Antimicrob Chemother 2012;67:2976–2981.Google Scholar
7. Lin, MY, Rezny, S, Ray, MJ, Jovanov, D, Weinstein, RA, Trick, WE. Predicting carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae (CRE) carriage at the time of admission using a state-wide hospital discharge database. Open Forum Infectious Diseases 2016; 3(Supplement 1):S69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality website. https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/toolssoftware/ccs/ccs.jsp. Published 2017. Accessed September 9, 2017.Google Scholar
9. Antimicrobial Use and Resistance (AUR) Module. The Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention website. https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdfs/pscmanual/11pscaurcurrent.pdf. Published 2017. Accessed January 25, 2018.Google Scholar
10. Magill, SS, Edwards, JR, Beldavs, ZG, et al. Prevalence of antimicrobial use in US acute care hospitals, May–September 2011. JAMA 2014;312:1438–1446.Google Scholar
11. Antibiotic Resistance Solutions Initiative. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/solutions-initiative/index.html. Published 2017. Accessed September 9, 2017.Google Scholar
12. Chalmers, JD, Rother, C, Salih, W, Ewig, S. Healthcare-associated pneumonia does not accurately identify potentially resistant pathogens: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2013;58:330–339.Google Scholar
13. Yap, V, Datta, D, Metersky, ML. Is the present definition of health care–associated pneumonia the best way to define risk of infection with antibiotic-resistant pathogens? Infect Dis Clin 2013;27:1–18.Google Scholar
14. Jhung, MA, Banerjee, SN. Administrative coding data and health care-associated infections. Clin Infect Dis 2009;49:949–955.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Ray et al. supplementary material

Ray et al. supplementary material 1

Download Ray et al. supplementary material(File)
File 14 KB
Supplementary material: File

Ray et al. supplementary material

Ray et al. supplementary material 2

Download Ray et al. supplementary material(File)
File 238.6 KB
Supplementary material: File

Ray et al. supplementary material

Ray et al. supplementary material 3

Download Ray et al. supplementary material(File)
File 15.3 KB