Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:03:58.312Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Application of Multilocus Enzyme Electrophoresis to Epidemiologic Investigations of Xanthomonas Maltophilia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Barbara Schable*
Affiliation:
Nosocomial Infections Laboratory Branch, Hospital Infections Program, Centers for Disease Control, Public Health Service, U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, Georgia
Margarita E. Villarino
Affiliation:
Nosocomial Infections Laboratory Branch, Hospital Infections Program, Centers for Disease Control, Public Health Service, U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, Georgia
Martin S. Favero
Affiliation:
Nosocomial Infections Laboratory Branch, Hospital Infections Program, Centers for Disease Control, Public Health Service, U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, Georgia
J. Michael Miller
Affiliation:
Nosocomial Infections Laboratory Branch, Hospital Infections Program, Centers for Disease Control, Public Health Service, U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, Georgia
*
Centers for Disease Control, 1600 Clifton Road, Mailstop C01, Atlanta, GA 30333

Abstract

Objective:

To test the utility of a newly developed multilocus enzyme electrophoresis typing method for Xanthomonas maltophilia.

Design:

Isolates were first screened by slide agglutination, which served as the standard to characterize the outbreak strains. All isolates were then subjected to multilocus enzyme elec-trophoresis and the results analyzed based on epidemiological data.

Setting:

This outbreak occurred in a shock-trauma intensive care unit of a large general community hospital.

Patients:

Patients admitted to the shock-trauma intensive care unit who had X maltophilia isolated from any site > 24 hours after admission met the case definition. Specimens from patients who fit the case definition were characterized, as were specimens from other patients that were used as controls for nonoutbreak isolates. Environmental samples were also evaluated for X maltophilia.

Results:

Most of the 64 isolates received during this outbreak were serotype 10, and when they were subjected to multilocus enzyme electro-phoresis, one electrophoretic type predominated and correlated to most outbreak isolates. Unrelated isolates of serotype 10 from other institutions all exhibited unique electrophoretic types.

Conclusion:

Application of multilocus enzyme electrophoresis to X maltophilia outbreaks is a valuable addition to the characterization of suspected outbreak strains.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Schable, B, Rhoden, DL, Hugh, R, et al. Serological classification of Xanthomonas maltophilia (Pseudomonas maltophilia) based on heat-stable 0 antigens. J Clin Microbiol. 1989;27:10111014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Bibb, WF, Schwartz, B, Gellin, BG, et al. Analysis of Listeria monocytogenes by multilocus enzyme electrophoresis and application of the method to epidemiologic investigations. Int J Food Microbiol. 1989;8:233239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Altwegg, M, Altwegg-Bissig, R, Demarta, A, et al. Comparison of four typing methods for Aeromonas species. j Diarrhoeal Dis Res. 1988,68894.Google ScholarPubMed
4. Olyhoek, T, Crowe, BA, Achtman, M. Clonal population structure of Neisseria meningitidis serogroup A isolated from epidemics and pandemics between 1915 and 1983. Rev Infect Dis. 1987;9:665687.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Edelstein, PH, Nakahama, C, Tobin, JO, et al. A paleoepidemiologic investigation of Legionnaires' disease at Wadsworth Veterans Administration Hospital by using three typing methods for comparison of Legionellae from clinical and environmental sources. J Clin Microbiol. 1986;23:11211126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Musser, J, Hewlett, EL, Peppier, MS, et al. Genetic diversity and relationships in populations of Bordatella spp. J Bacteriol. 1986;166:230237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Harris, H, Hopkinson, DA. Handbook of Enzyme Electrophoresis in Human Genetics. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland Publishing Co.; 1976.Google Scholar
8. Lawrence, SH, Melnick, PJ, Weimer, HE. A comparison of serum proteins and enzymes by starch-gel electrophoresis. Proc Soc Exper Biol Med. 1960;105:572575.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Selander, RK, Caugant, DA, Ochman, H, et al. Methods of multilocus enzyme electrophoresis for bacterial population genetics and systematics. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986;51:873884.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Hunter, PR, Gaston, MA. Numerical index of the discriminatory ability of typing systems: an application of Simpson's index of diversity. J Clin Microbiol. 1988;26:24652466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed