Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T08:51:49.032Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analytic Strategies in Hospital Epidemiology: Case-Control Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Eugene D. Shapiro
Eugene D. Shapiro*
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics and Epidemiology, Yale School of Medicine New Haven, Connecticut
*
Department of Pediatrics, Yale School of Medicine, PO Box 3333 New Haven, CT (06510-8064)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Case-control studies (sometimes referred to as case-referent studies) have long been important in epidemiologic research. This technique has been instrumental in allowing researchers to discover the associations between cigarettes and lung cancer, thromboembolism and oral contraceptives, and stilbesterol and vaginal cancer, just to cite a few examples. The case-control method is also a very useful technique for studies in hospital epidemiology. This article will briefly review this technique, its advantages, and some of its potential pitfalls.

Type
Special Sections
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , April 1989 , pp. 167 - 169
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Schlesselman, JJ: Case-Control Studies: Design, Conduct, Analysis. New York, Oxford University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
2. Breslow, NE, Dav, NE: Statistical Methods in Cancer Research: Vol I. The Analysis of Case-Control Studies. Lyon, World Health Organization, 1980.Google Scholar
3. Cornfield, J: A method of estimating comparative rates from clinical data. Application for cancers of the lung, breast and cervix. J Natl Cancer Inst 1950–1951; 11:1269–1275.Google Scholar
4. Feinstein, AR: The scientific and clinical tribulations of randomized clinical trials. Clin Res 1978; 26:241–244.Google Scholar
5. Kelsey, JL. Thompson, WD. Evans, AS: Methods in Observational Epidemiology. New York, Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
6. Feinstein, AR: Clinical Epidemiology: The Architecture of Clinical Research. Philadelphia. WB Saunders Company. 1985.Google Scholar
7. Silber, ALM. Horwitz, RI: Detection bias and relation of benign breast disease to breast cancer. Lancet 1986; 1:638–640.10.1016/S0140-6736(86)91722-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Sackett, DL: Bias in analytic research. J Chron Dis 1979: 32:51–63.10.1016/0021-9681(79)90012-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Feinstem, AR, Walter, SD, Horwitz, RJ: An analysis of Berkson's bias in case-control studies. J Chron Dis 1986; 39:495–504.10.1016/0021-9681(86)90194-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Mantel, N, Haenszel, W: Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer lust 1959: 22:719–748.Google ScholarPubMed