Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:26:29.560Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Outbreak of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Related to Contaminated Urodynamic Equipment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Michael W. Climo ,
Antonio Pastor  and
Edward S. Wong
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Investigation of an outbreak of multiresistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa urinary tract infections within our hospital identified the urodynamic laboratory as the point source. Disinfection procedures were inadequate, and transducers designated for single-patient use were used repeatedly and subsequently became contaminated. These improper procedures were part of a cost-containment effort.

Type
Concise Communications
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 18 , Issue 7 , July 1997 , pp. 509 - 510
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Kaplan, SA, Te, AAE. Uroflowmetry and urodynamics. Urol Clin North Am 1995;22:309–320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Hamill, RJ, Wright, CE, Andres, N, Koza, MA. Urinary tract infection following instrumentation for urodynamic testing. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1989;10:26–32.Google Scholar
3. Cann, KJ, Johnstone, D, Skene, AI. An outbreak of Serratia marcescens infection following urodynamic studies. J Hosp Infect 1987;9:291–293.Google Scholar
4. Glenister, H, Holton, J, Teall, A. Urinary tract pressure recording equipment: a source of infection. J Hosp Infect 1985;6:224–226.Google Scholar
5. Talbot, GH, Doorley, M, Banner, MP. Urosepsis associated with urodynamic studies. Am J Infect Control 1984;12:266–270.Google Scholar
6. Payne, SR, Timoney, AG, McKenning, ST, den Hollander, D, Pearl, LJ, Maskell, RM. Microbiological look at urodynamic studies. Lancet 1988;2:1123–1126.Google Scholar
7. Baker, KR, Drutz, HP, Barnes, MD. Effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in preventing bacteriuria after multichannel urody-namic investigations: a blind, randomized study in 124 female patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991;165:679–681.Google Scholar
8. Nunns, D, Smith, AR, Hosker, G. Reagent strip testing for significant bacteriuria in a urodynamic clinic. Br J Urol 1995;76:87–89.Google Scholar
9. Coptcoat, MJ, Reed, C, Cumming, J, Shah, PJ, Worth, PH. Is antibiotic prophylaxis necessary for urodynamic investigations? A controlled study in 100 patients. Br J Urol 1988;61:302–303.Google Scholar