Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T12:46:15.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Survival of Mycobacteria on N95 Personal Respirators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Tiina A. Reponen ,
Zheng Wang ,
Klaus Willeke  and
Sergey A. Grinshpun
Tiina A. Reponen*
Affiliation:
Aerosol Research and Exposure Assessment Laboratory, Department of Environmental Health, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
Zheng Wang
Affiliation:
Aerosol Research and Exposure Assessment Laboratory, Department of Environmental Health, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
Klaus Willeke
Affiliation:
Aerosol Research and Exposure Assessment Laboratory, Department of Environmental Health, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
Sergey A. Grinshpun
Affiliation:
Aerosol Research and Exposure Assessment Laboratory, Department of Environmental Health, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
*
Aerosol Research and Exposure Assessment Laboratory, Department of Environmental Health, University of Cincinnati, PO Box 670056, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0056
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives:

The overall aim of this study was to investigate the survival and possible growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis simulant bacteria on respirator filters.

Methods:

Mycobacterium smegmatis was used as a biochemical simulant for M tuberculosis. Bacterial survival was tested on National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health-certified N95 respirators from three manufacturers. The first experiments simulated one-time respirator use and subsequent storage for 1 to 9 days under ideal conditions for the growth of mycobacteria: 37°C and 85% relative humidity. The bacteria were loaded on the respirator filters under three different nutritional conditions: in the absence of nutrients; in the presence of human saliva (simulating conditions when the respirator is worn); and in the presence of nutrient broth (for ideal growth potential). The subsequent experiments simulated respirator wear for 2 hours under medium workload conditions at a breathing rate of 56 L/min.

Results:

It was found that M smegmatis did not grow on the tested respirators, even when the respirators were stored at temperature, humidity, and nutrition conditions most favorable for microbial growth. However, these bacteria could survive on respirators for up to 3 days during storage. The culturability of M smegmatis was not affected by airflow that simulated the breathing rate associated with medium work-load conditions for 2 hours.

Conclusions:

This study shows that M tuberculosis surrogate bacteria collected on a respirator are not able to grow and are able to survive only in ideal (ie, not clinically relevant) conditions. Based on these experiments, we conclude that M tuberculosis is unlikely ever to become an infectious problem in the air again, once it is removed by a respirator.

Type
Orginal Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 20 , Issue 4 , April 1999 , pp. 237 - 241
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Tuberculosis morbidity-United States, 1992. MMWR 1993;42:696–705.Google Scholar
2.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guidelines for preventing the transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in health-care facilities. MMWR 1994;43:1–132.Google Scholar
3.Fennelly, KPersonal respiratory protection against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Clin Chest Med 1997;18:1–17.Google Scholar
4.Qian, Y, Willeke, K, Grinshpun, S, Donnelly, J. Performance of N95 respirators: filtration efficiency for airborne bacteria and solid particles. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1998;59:128–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Willeke, K, Qian, Y. Tuberculosis control through respirator wear: performance of NIOSH-regulated respirators. Am J Infect Control 1998;26:139–142.Google Scholar
6.Qian, Y, Willeke, K, Grinshpun, S, Donnelly, J. Performance of N95 respirators: reaerosolization of bacteria and solid particles. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1997a;58:876–880.Google Scholar
7.Rivera, P, Louther, J, Mohr, J, Campbell, A, DeHovitz, J, and Sepkowitz, KA. Does a cheaper mask save money? The cost implementing a respiratory personal protective equipment program. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1997;18:24–27.Google Scholar
8.Wayne, LG. Cultivation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis for research purposes. In: Bloom, BR, ed. Tuberculosis. Pathogenesis, Protection, and Control. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology Press; 1994:73–83.Google Scholar
9.Freeman, BABurrows Textbook of Microbiology. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Co; 1985:610–611.Google Scholar
10.Respiratory protection devices: final rule and notice. (42 CFR Part 84) Federal Register June 8, 1995;60(110):30336–30404.Google Scholar
11.Greenspan, L. Humidity fixed points of binary saturated aqueous solutions. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards-A. Physics and Chemistry 1977;81A:89–96.Google Scholar
12.Nolte, FS, Metchok, C. Mycobacterium. In: Murray, PR, Baron, EJ, Pfaller, MA, Tenover, FC, Yolken, RH, eds. Clinical Microbiology. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology Press; 1995:400–437.Google Scholar
13.Schafer, MP, Fernback, JE, Jensen, PA. Sampling and analytical method development for qualitative assessment of airborne mycobacterial species of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1998;59:540–546.Google Scholar
14.Qian, Y, Willeke, K, Ulevicius, V, Grinshpun, S. Particle reentrainment from fibrous filters. Aerosol Science and Technology 1997b;27:394–404.Google Scholar
15.Afonka, D. Saliva and Its Relation to Oral Health. Montgomery, AL: Paragon Press; 1961:40–43.Google Scholar
16.Barnhart, S, Sheppard, L, Beaudet, N, Stover, B, Baimes, J. Tuberculosis in health care settings and the estimated benefits of engineering controls and respiratory protection. J Occup Environ Med 1997;39:849–854.Google Scholar
17.Berlin, OGW. Mycobacteria. In: Baron, EJ, Finegold, SM, eds. Bailey & Scott's Diagnostic Microbiology. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: The C.V. Mosby Company; 1990:597–640.Google Scholar