Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:07:04.084Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Survey of SHEA Members on Universal Precautions and HIV Screening

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Patti J. Miller*
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia
Barry M. Farr
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia
*
PO Box 473, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, VA 22908

Extract

The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) have recommended that health care workers use appropriate barriers, referred to as universal precautions, to protect themselves against exposure to the blood and body fluids of all patients. The CDC has suggested that the use of universal precautions eliminates the need for the isolation category blood and body fluid precautions (BBFP). There has been discussion concerning the feasibility of applying these precautions to all patients. Tangential issues involving screening of all hospitalized patients and whether or not informed consent should be required before such testing occurs are also being debated.

The purpose of the current study was to survey those attending a meeting of The Society of Hospital Epidemiologists of America (SHEA) in October 1987 to determine their opinions on these issues and their hospitals' actual practices with regard to universal precautions, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) screening, and informed consent.

Type
Special Sections
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Recommendations for prevention of HIV transmission in health-care settings. MMWR 08 21, 1987; 36(suppl):35185.Google Scholar
2. Protecting Hospital Employees, teleconference. American Hospital Association. 08 22, 1987.Google Scholar
3. Hospital Statistics, Chicago, American Hospital Association, 1985.Google Scholar
4. Ranki, A. Krohn, M, Allain, J, et al: Long latency precedes overt seroconversion in sexually transmitted human-immunodeficiency-virus infection. Lancet 1987; 2:589593.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Miller, D. Jeffries, DJ, Green, J, et al: HTLV-III: Should testing ever he routine? Medical Practice 1986; 292:941943.Google Scholar
6. Meyer, KB, SG, Pauker: Screening for HIV: Can we afford the false positive rate? N Engl J Med 1987; 316:238241.10.1056/NEJM198707233170410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. DM, Barnes: New questions about AIDS test accuracy. Science 1987; 238:884885.Google Scholar