Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:05:55.312Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Study of the Relationship Between Environmental Contamination with Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Patients' Acquisition of MRSA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Katherine J. Hardy ,
Beryl A. Oppenheim ,
Savita Gossain ,
Fang Gao  and
Peter M. Hawkey
Katherine J. Hardy*
Affiliation:
West Midlands Public Health Laboratory, Health Protection Agency, Heartlands Hospital, Bordesley Green East, Birmingham, United Kingdom Department of Immunity and Infection, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
Beryl A. Oppenheim
Affiliation:
West Midlands Public Health Laboratory, Health Protection Agency, Heartlands Hospital, Bordesley Green East, Birmingham, United Kingdom
Savita Gossain
Affiliation:
West Midlands Public Health Laboratory, Health Protection Agency, Heartlands Hospital, Bordesley Green East, Birmingham, United Kingdom
Fang Gao
Affiliation:
Intensive Care Unit, Heartlands Hospital, Bordesley Green East, Birmingham, United Kingdom
Peter M. Hawkey
Affiliation:
West Midlands Public Health Laboratory, Health Protection Agency, Heartlands Hospital, Bordesley Green East, Birmingham, United Kingdom Department of Immunity and Infection, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
*
West Midlands Public Health Laboratory, Health Protection Agency, Heartlands Hospital, Bordesley Green East, Birmingham, B9 5SS, UK ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective.

The study aimed to examine the presence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in the environment and its relationship to patients' acquisition of MRSA.

Design.

A prospective study was conducted in a 9-bed intensive care unit for 14 months. At every environmental screening, samples were obtained from the same 4 sites in each bed space. Patients were screened at admission and then 3 times weekly. All environmental and patient strains were typed using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

Results.

MRSA was isolated from the environment at every environmental screening, when both small and large numbers of patients were colonized. Detailed epidemiological typing of 250 environmental and 139 patient isolates revealed 14 different pulsed-field gel electrophoresis profiles, with variants of EMRSA-15 being the predominant type. On only 20 (35.7%) of 56 occasions were the strains isolated from the patients and the strains isolated from their immediate environment indistinguishable. There was strong evidence to suggest that 3 of 26 patients who acquired MRSA while in the intensive care unit acquired MRSA from the environment.

Conclusions.

This study reveals widespread contamination of the hospital environment with MRSA, highlights the complexities of the problem of contamination, and confirms the need for more-effective cleaning of the hospital environment to eliminate MRSA.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , February 2006 , pp. 127 - 132
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Blythe, D, Keenlyside, D, Dawson, SI, Galloway, A. Environmental contamination due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). J Hosp Infect 1998; 38:67–70.Google Scholar
2.Thomas, RJ, Goodbourne, C, Goldie, B. The transmission of MRSA via orthopaedic marking pens—fact or fiction. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2004; 86:51–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Bures, S, Fishbain, JT, Uyehara, CF, Parker, JM, Berg, BW. Computer keyboards and faucet handles as reservoirs of nosocomial pathogens in the intensive care unit. Am J Infect Control 2000; 28:465–471.Google Scholar
4.Jawad, A, Heritage, J, Snelling, M, Gascoyne-Binzi, DM, Hawkey, PM. Influence of relative humidity and suspending menstrua on survival of Acinetobacter spp. on dry surfaces. J Clin Microbiol 1996; 34:2881–2887.Google Scholar
5.Dietze, B, Rath, A, Wendt, C, Martiny, H. Survival of MRSA on sterile goods packaging. J Hosp Infect 2001; 49:255–261.Google Scholar
6.Boyce, JM, Potter-Bynoe, G, Chenevert, C, King, T. Environmental contamination due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: possible infection control implications. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1997; 18: 622–627.Google Scholar
7.Kumari, DN, Haji, TC, Keer, V, et al. Ventilation grilles as a potential source of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus causing an outbreak in an orthopaedic ward at a district general hospital. J Hosp Infect 1998; 39:127–133.Google Scholar
8.National Health Service Estates. National standards of cleanliness. London: UK Department of Health, 2003.Google Scholar
9.Kearns, AM, Seiders, PR, Wheeler, J, Freeman, R, Steward, M. Rapid detection of methicillin-resistant staphylococci by multiplex PCR. J Hosp Infect 1999; 43:33–37.Google Scholar
10.Murchan, S, Kaufmann, ME, Deplano, A, et al. Harmonization of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis protocols for epidemiological typing of strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a single approach developed by consensus in 10 European laboratories and its application for tracing the spread of related strains. J Clin Microbiol 2003; 41:1574–1585.Google Scholar
11.Shiomori, T, Miyamoto, H, Makishima, K, et al. Evaluation of bedmaking-related airborne and surface methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus contamination. J Hosp Infect 2002; 50:30–35.Google Scholar
12.Revised guidelines for the control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in hospitals. British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Hospital Infection Society, and the Infection Control Nurses Association. J Hosp Infect 1998; 39:253–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Rampling, A, Wiseman, S, Davis, L, et al. Evidence that hospital hygiene is important in the control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Hosp Infect 2001; 49:109–116.Google Scholar
14.Shooter, RA, Smith, MA, Griffiths, JD, et al. Spread of staphylococci in a surgical ward. Br Med J 1958; 45:607–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Duckworth, GJ, Jordens, JZ. Adherence and survival properties of an epidemic methicillin-resistant strain of Staphylococcus aureus compared with those of mefhicillin-sensitive strains. J Med Microbiol 1990; 32:195–200.Google Scholar
16.Wagenvoort, JH, Sluijsmans, W, Penders, RJ. Better environmental survival of outbreak vs. sporadic MRSA isolates. J Hosp Infect 2000; 45:231–234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed