Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T08:34:38.222Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sporicidal Activity of Chemical Sterilants Used in Hospitals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

William A. Rutala ,
Maria F. Gergen  and
David J. Weber
William A. Rutala*
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and the Department of Hospital Epidemiology, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Maria F. Gergen
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and the Department of Hospital Epidemiology, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
David J. Weber
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and the Department of Hospital Epidemiology, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
*
Division of Infectious Diseases, CB #7030 Burnett-Womack 547, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7030
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

The current study was designed to assess the sporicidal activity of chemical sterilants using the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) sporicidal test. Chemical sterilants are used most commonly in the healthcare setting to disinfect medical instruments such as endoscopes. This study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of several newer formulations of glutaraldehydes and hydrogen peroxide as chemical sterilants.

Design:

Using the AOAC test the following agents were tested: two 2% alkaline glutaraldehydes (2% Alk-Glut), 2% acid glutaraldehyde (2% Acid Glut), 2% glutaraldehyde-7.05% phenol-1.20% sodium phenate, 10% glutaraldehyde-0.5% phenylphenol-0.1% tertiary amylphenol, and 6% hydrogen peroxide (H202). Growth in > 1 of 60 seeded penicylinders is considered by the AOAC to indicate failure of sporicidal activity,

Results:

Test results of the six disinfectants against Bacillus subtilis using the manufacturers' specified use-dilution and exposure time were: 0/60 with 2% Alk-Glut (product 1) at 10 hours, 0/60 with 2% Alk-Glut (product 2) at 8 hours, 0/60 with 2% Acid Glut at 10 hours, 2/60 with 2% glutaraldehyde-7.05% phenol-1 .20% sodium phenate at 6.75 hours, 0/60 with a 1:5 dilution (2.0% Glut) of 10% glutaraldehyde-0.5% phenylphenol-0. 1% amylphenol at 6 hours, 59/60 with a 1:20 dilution (0.5% Glut) of 10% glutaraldehyde-0.5% phenylphenol-0.1% tertiary amylphenol at 12 hours and 0/60 with 6% H202 at 6 hours. Test results against Clostridium sporogenes were: 2/60 with 2% Alk-Glut (product 1) at 10 hours, 1/60 with 2% Alk-Glut (product 2) at 8 hours, 1/60 with 2% Acid Glut at 10 hours, 2/60 with undiluted 2% glutaraldehyde-7.05% phenol-1.20% sodium phenate at 6.75 hours, 6/60 with a 1:5 dilution (2% Glut) of 10% glutaraldehyde-0.5% phenylphenol-0.1% amylpenol at 6 hours, 60/60 with a 1:20 dilution (0.5% Glut) of 10% glutaraldehyde-0.5% phenylphenol-0.1% amylpenol at 12 hours, and 0/60 with 6% H202 at 6 hours. Dilutions of 2% glutaraldehyde-7.05% phenol-1.20% sodium phenate yielded the following results against C sporogenes: 59/60 with a 1:8 dilution (0.25% Glut) at 6.75 hours, 60/60 with a 1:16 dilution (0.125% Glut) at 6.75 hours, 11/90 with a 1:8 (0.25% Glut) dilution at 12 hours, and 60/60 with a 1:16 dilution (0.125% Glut) at 12 hours.

Conclusions:

Both 2% acid and alkaline glutaraldehydes are effective chemical sterilants. Diluting glutaraldehyde-based sterilants below 2% glutaraldehyde resulted in failure to kill spores of B subtilis and C sporogenes.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 14 , Issue 12 , December 1993 , pp. 713 - 718
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Mandeli, GL, Douglas, RG Jr, Bennett, JE, eds. Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases. 3rd ed. New York. NY: Churchill Livingstone; 1990:863-869,1595-1598,1850–1860.Google Scholar
2. Rutala, WA. APIC guideline for selection and use of disinfectants. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1990;18:99–117.Google Scholar
3. Russell, AD. Bacterial spores and chemical sporicidal agents. Clin Microbiol Rev 1990;3:99–119.Google Scholar
4. Pepper, RE. Comparison of the activities and stabilities of alkaline glutaraldehyde sterilizing solutions. Infect Control 1980;1:90–92.Google Scholar
5. William, S, ed. Official Methods of Analysis. 14th ed. Arlington, VA Association of Official Analytical Chemists; 1984.Google Scholar
6. Tanner, FW. The Microbiology of Foods. 2nd ed. Champaign, IL: Garrard Press; 1944.Google Scholar
7. Centers for Disease Control. Federal regulatory action against sporicidin cold sterilizing solution. MMWR 1991;40:880–881.Google Scholar
8. United States Environmental Protection Agency. EPA takes stop sale action and requests recall of metracide and coldspor sterilant pesticides for lack of efficacy; issues civil complaints. May 15,1992. Press advisory.Google Scholar
9. Metrex Research Corporation v. United States of America and William K. Reilly. Civil action no. 92-B-922. (U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, 1992.)Google Scholar
10. Metrex Research Corporation. Metrex Research Corporation wins in U.S. District Court. Parker, CO; June 1992. Press release.Google Scholar
11. Power, EGM, Russell, AD. Sporicidal action of alkaline glutaraldehyde: factors influencing activity and a comparison with other aldehydes.J Appl Bacteriol 1990;69:261–268.Google Scholar
12. Collins, FM, Montalbine, V. Mycobactericidal activity of glutaraldehyde solutions. J Clin Microbiol 1976;4:408–412.Google Scholar
13. Babb, JR, Bradley, CR, Ayliffe, GAJ. Sporicidal activity of glutaraldehydes and hypochlorites and other factors influencing their selection for the treatment of medical equipment. J Hosp infect 1980;1:63–75.Google Scholar
14. Efficacy Data Requirements: Sterilizers. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. April 15,1981:1.Google Scholar
15. Vesley, D, Norlien, KG, Nelson, B, Ott, B, Streifel, AJ. Significant factors in the disinfection and sterilization of flexible endoscopes. Am J Infect Control 1992;20:291–300.Google Scholar