Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T23:36:03.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prospective, Controlled, Cross-Over Trial of Alcohol-Based Hand Gel in Critical Care Units

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Mark E. Rupp ,
Teresa Fitzgerald ,
Susan Puumala ,
James R. Anderson ,
Rita Craig ,
Peter C. Iwen ,
Dawn Jourdan ,
Janet Keuchel ,
Nedra Marion  and
Delayne Peterson
...Show all authors
Mark E. Rupp*
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha Department of Healthcare Epidemiology, Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha
Teresa Fitzgerald
Affiliation:
Department of Healthcare Epidemiology, Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha
Susan Puumala
Affiliation:
Department of Societal and Preventive Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha
James R. Anderson
Affiliation:
Department of Societal and Preventive Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha
Rita Craig
Affiliation:
Department of Healthcare Epidemiology, Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha
Peter C. Iwen
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha
Dawn Jourdan
Affiliation:
Department of Healthcare Epidemiology, Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha
Janet Keuchel
Affiliation:
Department of Healthcare Epidemiology, Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha
Nedra Marion
Affiliation:
Department of Healthcare Epidemiology, Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha
Delayne Peterson
Affiliation:
Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha
Lee Sholtz
Affiliation:
Department of Healthcare Epidemiology, Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha
Valerie Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Healthcare Epidemiology, Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha
*
984031 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-4031 ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background.

There are limited data from prospective studies to indicate whether improvement in hand hygiene associated with the use of alcohol-based hand hygiene products results in improved patient outcomes.

Design.

A 2-year, prospective, controlled, cross-over trial of alcohol-based hand gel.

Setting.

The study was conducted in 2 medical-surgical ICUs for adults, each with 12 beds, from August 2001 to September 2003 at a university-associated, tertiary care teaching hospital.

Methods.

An alcohol-based hand gel was provided in one critical care unit and not provided in the other. After 1 year, the assignment was reversed. The hand hygiene adherence rate and the incidence of nosocomial infection were monitored. Samples for culture were obtained from nurses' hands every 2 months.

Results.

During 17,994 minutes of observation, which included 3,678 opportunities for hand hygiene, adherence rates improved dramatically after the introduction of hand gel, increasing from 37% to 68% in one unit and from 38% to 69% in the other unit (P < .001). Improvement was observed among all groups of healthcare workers. Hand hygiene rates were better at higher workloads when hand gel was available in the unit (P = .02). No substantial change in the rates of device-associated infection, infection due to multidrug-resistant pathogens, or infection due to Clostridium difficile was observed. Culture of samples from the hands of nursing staff revealed that an increased number of microbes and an increased number of microbe species was associated with longer fingernails (ie, more than 2 mm long), the wearing of rings, and/or lack of access to hand gel.

Conclusions.

The introduction of alcohol-based gel resulted in a significant and sustained improvement in the rate of hand hygiene adherence. Fingernail length greater than 2 mm, wearing rings, and lack of access to hand gel were associated with increased microbial carriage on the hands. This improvement in the hand hygiene adherence rate was not associated with detectable changes in the incidence of healthcare-associated infection.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , January 2008 , pp. 8 - 15
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Jarvis, WR. Selected aspects of the socioeconomic impact of nosocomial infections: morbidity, mortality, cost, and prevention. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1996;17:552–557.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Alonso-Echanove, J, Gaynes, RRScope and Magnitude of Nosocomial ICU Infections. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2002.Google Scholar
3.Pittet, D, Boyce, JM. Hand hygiene and patient care: pursuing the Semmelweis legacy. Lancet Infect Dis 2001;1:9–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Voss, A, Widmer, ARNo time for handwashing? Handwashing versus alcoholic rub: can we afford 100% compliance? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1997;18:205–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.O'Boyle, CA, Henly, SJ, Larson, E. Understanding adherence to hand hygiene recommendations: the theory of planned behavior. Am J Infect Control 2001;29:352–360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Boyce, JM, Pittet, D. Guideline for hand hygiene in health-care settings: recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002;23(12 suppl):S3–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System Manual. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 1999.Google Scholar
8.Paulson, DS, Fendler, EJ, Dolan, MJ, Williams, RA. A close look at alcohol gel as an antimicrobial sanitizing agent. Am J Infect Control 1999;27:332–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Abbreviated Identification of Bacteria and Yeast: Approved Guideline. Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2002: M35–A.Google Scholar
10.Pittet, D, Mourouga, P, Perneger, TV. Compliance with handwashing in a teaching hospital. Infection Control Program. Ann Intern Med 1999;130:126–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Larson, E, Kretzer, EK. Compliance with handwashing and barrier precautions. J Hosp Infect 1995;30(suppl):88–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Watanakunakorn, C, Wang, C, Hazy, J. An observational study of hand washing and infection control practices by healthcare workers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1998;19:858–860.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Daniels, IR, Rees, BI. Handwashing: simple, but effective. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1999;81:117–118.Google ScholarPubMed
14.Tibballs, J. Teaching hospital medical staff to handwash. Med IA ust 1996;164:395–398.Google ScholarPubMed
15.Boyce, JM. It is time for action: improving hand hygiene in hospitals. Ann Intern Med 1999;130:153–155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Kownatzki, E. Hand hygiene and skin health. J Hosp Infect 2003;55:239–245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Bischoff, WE, Reynolds, TM, Sessler, CN, Edmond, MB, Wenzel, RRHandwashing compliance by health care workers: the impact of introducing an accessible, alcohol-based hand antiseptic. Arch Intern Med 2000;160:1017–1021.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Maury, E, Alzieu, M, Baudei, JL, et al.Availability of an alcohol solution can improve hand disinfection compliance in an intensive care unit. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;162:324–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Kohan, C, Ligi, C, Dumigan, DG, Boyce, JM. The importance of evaluating product dispensers when selecting alcohol-based handrubs. Am J Infect Control 2002;30:373–375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Widmer, AE, Dangei, M. Alcohol-based handrub: evaluation of technique and microbiological efficacy with international infection control professionals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2004;25:207–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Recommendations for preventing the spread of vancomycin resistance. Recommendations of the Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC). MMWR Recomm Rep 1995;44(RR-12):1–13.Google Scholar
22.Muto, CA, Jernigan, JA, Ostrowsky, BE, et al.SHEA guideline for preventing nosocomial transmission of multidrug-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus and enterococcus. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2003;24:362–386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Jones, RD, Jampani, HB, Newman, JL, Lee, AS. Triclosan: a review of effectiveness and safety in health care settings. Am J Infect Control 2000;28:184–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Hoang, TT, Schweizer, HP. Characterization of Pseudomonas aeruginosa enoyl-acyl carrier protein reductase (FabI): a target for the antimicrobial triclosan and its role in acylated homoserine lactone synthesis. J Bacteriol 1999;181:5489–5497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Chuanchuen, R, Beinlich, K, Hoang, TT, Becher, A, Karkhoff-Schweizer, RR, Schweizer, HP. Cross-resistance between triclosan and antibiotics in Pseudomonas aeruginosa is mediated by multidrug efflux pumps: exposure of a susceptible mutant strain to triclosan selects nfxB mutants overexpressing MexCD-OprJ. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2001;45:428–432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26.Heath, RJ, Rock, CO. A triclosan-resistant bacterial enzyme. Nature 2000;406:145–146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27.World Health Organization (WHO). World Alliance for Patient Safety. WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care (Advanced Draft). Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press; 2006.Google Scholar