Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:44:38.101Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prevalence of PPD Positivity Among New Employees at a Hospital in New York City

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Kent A. Sepkowitz ,
Peter Fella ,
Pedro Rivera ,
Nerinda Villa  and
Jack DeHovitz
Kent A. Sepkowitz*
Affiliation:
St Clare's Hospital and Health Center, New York City, New York Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center/Cornell Medical Center, New York City, New York
Peter Fella
Affiliation:
St Clare's Hospital and Health Center, New York City, New York
Pedro Rivera
Affiliation:
St Clare's Hospital and Health Center, New York City, New York
Nerinda Villa
Affiliation:
St Clare's Hospital and Health Center, New York City, New York
Jack DeHovitz
Affiliation:
St Clare's Hospital and Health Center, New York City, New York SUNY Health Science Center at Brooklyn, Brooklyn, New York
*
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Infections Disease Service, 1275 York Ave., Box 288, New York, NY 10021
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To determine the prevalence of tuberculin reactivity among all new employees at a hospital in New York City.

Designs:

Prospective measurement of purified protein derivative (PPD) status in consecutive new employees at a hospital in New York City from 1991 to 1993. All employees are tested as part of a pre-employment physical, assuring complete compliance. Aplisol (Parke-Davis, Morris Plains, NJ) was used in 1991 and 1992, and Tubersol (Connaught, Swiftwater, PA) in 1993. Tests were applied and interpreted by trained employee health personnel.

Results:

Of 313 consecutive new employees, comprising all job categories, 40% were PPD positive at time of initial hire, including 20% of US-born and 70% of foreign-born employees. Of 114 persons who had received BCG vaccination, 67% were PPD positive. By multivariate regression analysis, age, BCG vaccination history, and foreign country of birth were independent predictors of a reactive PPD test.

Conclusions:

The high prevalence of tuberculin reactivity may reflect high rates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection and disease in the community, complicating interpretation of the efficacy of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines to prevent the spread of tuberculosis in healthcare facilities.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 16 , Issue 6 , June 1995 , pp. 344 - 347
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Tuberculosis in New York City, 1992. New York City, NY: Bureau of Tuberculosis Control, Department of Health information summary; 1993.Google Scholar
2. Sepkowitz, KA. Tuberculosis and the health care worker: a historical perspective. Ann Intern Med 1994;120:71–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Expanded tuberculosis surveillance and tuberculosis morbidity-United States, 1993. MMWR 1994;43:361–366.Google Scholar
4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guidelines for preventing the transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in health-care facilities, 1994. MMWR 1994;43(RR-13):1–132.Google Scholar
5. Bowden, KM, McDiarmid, MA. Occupationally acquired tuberculosis: what's known. J Occup Med 1994;36:320–325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Sepkowitz, KA. AIDS, tuberculosis. and the health care worker. Clin Infect Dis 1995;20:232–242.Google Scholar
7. Menzies, R, Vissandjee, B, Rocher, I, St Germain, Y. The booster effect in two-step tuberculin testing among young adults in Montreal. Ann Intern Med 1994;120:190–198.Google Scholar
8. Rosenblum, IS, Castro, KG, Dooley, S, Morgan, M. Effect of HIV infection and tuberculosis on hospitalizations and cost of care for young adults in the United States, 19851990. Ann Intern Med 1994;121:786–792.Google Scholar
9. Reichman, LB, O'Day, R. Tuberculosis screening in a large urban population. Am Rev Respir Dis 1978;117:705–712.Google Scholar
10. Cross, ER, Hyams, KC. Tuberculin skin testing in US Navy and Marine Corps personnel and recruits, 1980-1986. Am J Public Health 1990;80:435–438.Google Scholar
11. Fraser, VJ, Kilo, CM, Bailey, TC, Medoff, G, Dunagan, WC. Screening of physicians for tuberculosis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1994;15:9–100.Google Scholar
12. Schwartzman, K, Loo, V, Menzies, R Prevalence of tuberculous infection in healthcare workers. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994; A853.Google Scholar
13. Stracher, AR, Fuentes, LS, Ramos, E, Stoeckle, MY, Sepkowitz, KA. High prevalence of baseline PPD positivity in healthcare workers at a New York City hospital. Clin Res 1994;42:302A. Abstract.Google Scholar
14. Lanphear, BP, Linnemann, CC, Cannon, CG. A high false-positive rate of tuberculosis associated with Aplisol: an investigation among health care workers. J Infect Dis 1994;169:703–704.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed