Article contents
A Practical Tool for Surveillance of Surgical-Site Infections: A 5-Year Experience in Orthopedic Surgeries
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 March 2017
Abstract
Continuous surveillance of surgical-site infection (SSI) is labor intensive. We developed a semiautomatic surveillance system partly assisted by surgeons. Most patients who developed postdischarge SSI were readmitted, which allowed us to limit postdischarge surveillance to this group. This procedure significantly reduced workload while maintaining high sensitivity and specificity for SSI diagnosis.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:610–613
- Type
- Concise Communications
- Information
- Copyright
- © 2017 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved
References
REFERENCES
1.
Kirkland, KB, Briggs, JP, Trivette, SL, Wilkinson, WE, Sexton, DJ. The impact of surgical-site infections in the 1990s: attributable mortality, excess length of hospitalization, and extra costs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol
1999;20:725–730.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.
Choi, HJ, Adiyani, L, Sung, J, et al. Five-year decreased incidence of surgical site infections following gastrectomy and prosthetic joint replacement surgery through active surveillance by the Korean Nosocomial Infection Surveillance System. J Hosp Infect
2016;93:339–346.Google Scholar
3. CDC/NHSN surveillance definitions for specific types of infections. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdfs/pscmanual/17pscnosinfdef_current.pdf. Published 2016. Accessed May 10, 2016.Google Scholar
4.
Klompas, M, Yokoe, DS. Automated surveillance of health care-associated infections. Clin Infect Dis
2009;48:1268–1275.Google Scholar
5.
Sands, K, Vineyard, G, Platt, R. Surgical site infections occurring after hospital discharge. J Infect Dis
1996;173:963–970.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.
Edwards, JR, Peterson, KD, Mu, Y, et al. National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) report: data summary for 2006 through 2008, issued December 2009. Am J Infect Control
2009;37:783–805.Google Scholar
7.
Abramson, JH. WINPEPI updated: computer programs for epidemiologists, and their teaching potential. Epidemiol Perspect Innov
2011;8:1.Google Scholar
8.
Benneyan, JC, Lloyd, RC, Plsek, PE. Statistical process control as a tool for research and healthcare improvement. Quality Safety Health Care
2003;12:458–464.Google Scholar
9.
Ward, VP, Charlett, A, Fagan, J, Crawshaw, SC. Enhanced surgical site infection surveillance following caesarean section: experience of a multicentre collaborative post-discharge system. J Hosp Infect
2008;70:166–173.Google Scholar
10.
Lower, HL, Eriksen, HM, Aavitsland, P, Skjeldestad, FE. Methodology of the Norwegian Surveillance System for Healthcare-Associated Infections: the value of a mandatory system, automated data collection, and active postdischarge surveillance. Am J Infect Control
2013;41:591–596.Google Scholar
- 6
- Cited by