Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T00:11:51.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Postdischarge antibiotic use for prophylaxis following spinal fusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2020

David K. Warren*
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
Katelin B. Nickel
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
Jennifer H. Han
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Pam Tolomeo
Affiliation:
Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Christopher J. Hostler
Affiliation:
Duke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina Infectious Diseases Section, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina
Katherine Foy
Affiliation:
Duke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
Ian R. Banks
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
Victoria J. Fraser
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
Margaret A. Olsen
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri (Present affiliation: GlaxoSmithKline, Rockville, MD [J.H.H.].)
*
Author for correspondence: David K. Warren, E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Objective:

Despite recommendations to discontinue prophylactic antibiotics after incision closure or <24 hours after surgery, prophylactic antibiotics are continued after discharge by some clinicians. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence and factors associated with postdischarge prophylactic antibiotic use after spinal fusion.

Design:

Multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Patients:

This study included patients aged ≥18 years undergoing spinal fusion or refusion between July 2011 and June 2015 at 3 sites. Patients with an infection during the surgical admission were excluded.

Methods:

Prophylactic antibiotics were identified at discharge. Factors associated with postdischarge prophylactic antibiotic use were identified using hierarchical generalized linear models.

Results:

In total, 8,652 spinal fusion admissions were included. Antibiotics were prescribed at discharge in 289 admissions (3.3%). The most commonly prescribed antibiotics were trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (22.1%), cephalexin (18.8%), and ciprofloxacin (17.1%). Adjusted for study site, significant factors associated with prophylactic discharge antibiotics included American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class ≥3 (odds ratio [OR], 1.31; 95% CI, 1.00–1.70), lymphoma (OR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.11–5.98), solid tumor (OR, 3.63; 95% CI, 1.62–8.14), morbid obesity (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.09–2.47), paralysis (OR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.30–4.37), hematoma/seroma (OR, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.17–7.33), thoracic surgery (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.01–1.93), longer length of stay, and intraoperative antibiotics.

Conclusions:

Postdischarge prophylactic antibiotics were uncommon after spinal fusion. Patient and perioperative factors were associated with continuation of prophylactic antibiotics after hospital discharge.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© 2020 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

PREVIOUS PRESENTATION: This work was presented at IDWeek 2018 in San Francisco, California, on October 6, 2018.

References

Magill, SS, O’Leary, E, Janelle, SJ, et al. Changes in prevalence of healthcare-associated infections in US hospitals. N Engl J Med 2018;379:17321744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berrios-Torres, SI, Umscheid, CA, Bratzler, DW, et al. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guideline for the prevention of surgical site infection, 2017. JAMA Surg 2017;152:784791.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization. Global guidelines for the prevention of surgical site infection. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/250680/9789241549882-eng.pdf?sequence=8. Published 2016. Accessed August 7, 2019.Google Scholar
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Systematic review and evidence-based guidance on perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis. http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/Publications/Perioperative%20antibiotic%20prophylaxis%20-%20June%202013.pdf. Published 2013. Accessed June 17, 2019.Google Scholar
Shaffer, WO, Baisden, JL, Fernand, R, Matz, PG. An evidence-based clinical guideline for antibiotic prophylaxis in spine surgery. Spine J 2013;13:13871392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ingraham, AM, Cohen, ME, Bilimoria, KY, et al. Association of surgical care improvement project infection-related process measure compliance with risk-adjusted outcomes: implications for quality measurement. J Am Coll Surg 2010;211:705714.10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.09.006CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, Z, Chen, F, Ward, M, Bhattacharyya, T. Compliance with Surgical Care Improvement Project measures and hospital-associated infections following hip arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg Am 2012;94:13591366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhou, J, Wang, R, Huo, X, Xiong, W, Kang, L, Xue, Y. Incidence of surgical site infection after spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2020;45:208216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kakimaru, H, Kono, M, Matsusaki, M, Iwata, A, Uchio, Y. Postoperative antimicrobial prophylaxis following spinal decompression surgery: is it necessary? J Orthop Sci 2010;15:305309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, B, Moon, SH, Moon, ES, et al. Antibiotic microbial prophylaxis for spinal surgery: comparison between 48- and 72-hour AMP protocols. Asian Spine J 2010;4:7176.10.4184/asj.2010.4.2.71CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Takemoto, RC, Lonner, B, Andres, T, et al. Appropriateness of twenty-four-hour antibiotic prophylaxis after spinal surgery in which a drain is utilized: a prospective randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015;97:979986.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ulu-Kilic, A, Alp, E, Cevahir, F, et al. Economic evaluation of appropriate duration of antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention of neurosurgical infections in a middle-income country. Am J Infect Control 2015;43:4447.10.1016/j.ajic.2014.09.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamath, VH, Cheung, JP, Mak, KC, et al. Antimicrobial prophylaxis to prevent surgical site infection in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion: 2 doses versus antibiotics till drain removal. Eur Spine J 2016;25:32423248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacob Junior, C, de Assis, AC, Guimaraes, RG, Barbosa, IM, Batista Junior, JL. Postoperative comparison of the results from use of antibiotic prophylaxis for one and five days among patients undergoing lumbar arthrodesis. Revista brasileira de ortopedia 2016;51:333336.Google ScholarPubMed
Marimuthu, C, Abraham, VT, Ravichandran, M, Achimuthu, R. Antimicrobial prophylaxis in instrumented spinal fusion surgery: a comparative analysis of 24-Hour and 72-hour dosages. Asian Spine J 2016;10:10181022.10.4184/asj.2016.10.6.1018CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maciejczak, A, Wolan-Nieroda, A, Walaszek, M, Kolpa, M, Wolak, Z. Antibiotic prophylaxis in spine surgery: a comparison of single-dose and 72-hour protocols. J Hosp Infect 2019;103:303310.10.1016/j.jhin.2019.04.017CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hellbusch, LC, Helzer-Julin, M, Doran, SE, et al. Single-dose vs multiple-dose antibiotic prophylaxis in instrumented lumbar fusion—a prospective study. Surg Neurol 2008;70:622627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harbarth, S, Samore, MH, Lichtenberg, D, Carmeli, Y. Prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis after cardiovascular surgery and its effect on surgical site infections and antimicrobial resistance. Circulation 2000;101:29162921.10.1161/01.CIR.101.25.2916CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poeran, J, Mazumdar, M, Rasul, R, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis and risk of Clostridium difficile infection after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016;151:589597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Branch-Elliman, W, O’Brien, W, Strymish, J, Itani, K, Wyatt, C, Gupta, K. Association of duration and type of surgical prophylaxis with antimicrobial-associated adverse events. JAMA Surg 2019;154:590598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernatz, JT, Safdar, N, Hetzel, S, Anderson, PA. Antibiotic overuse is a major risk factor for Clostridium difficile infection in surgical patients. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:12541257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balch, A, Wendelboe, AM, Vesely, SK, Bratzler, DW. Antibiotic prophylaxis for surgical site infections as a risk factor for infection with Clostridium difficile . PLoS One 2017;12:e0179117.10.1371/journal.pone.0179117CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elixhauser, A, Steiner, C, Harris, R, Coffey, RM. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med. Care 1998;36:827.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) procedure-associated (PA) module: surgical site infection (SSI) event. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/PDFs/pscManual/9pscSSIcurrent.pdf. Published 2019. Accessed June 17, 2019.Google Scholar
Ene, M, Leighton, EA, Blue, GL, Bell, BA. Multilevel models for categorical data using SAS PROC GLIMMIX: the basics. SAS Global Forum 2015 Proceedings. https://support.sas.com/resources/papers/proceedings15/3430-2015.pdf. Published 2015. Accessed 7/30/2019.Google Scholar
Pesenti, S, Pannu, T, Andres-Bergos, J, et al. What are the risk factors for surgical site infection after spinal fusion? A meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 2018;27:24692480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pull ter Gunne, AF, Hosman, AJ, Cohen, DB, et al. A methodological systematic review on surgical site infections following spinal surgery: part 1: risk factors. Spine (Phila Pa) 2012;37:20172033.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olsen, MA, Mayfield, J, Lauryssen, C, et al. Risk factors for surgical site infection in spinal surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 2003;98:149155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Veeravagu, A, Patil, CG, Lad, SP, Boakye, M. Risk factors for postoperative spinal wound infections after spinal decompression and fusion surgeries. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34:18691872.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blam, OG, Vaccaro, AR, Vanichkachorn, JS, et al. Risk factors for surgical site infection in the patient with spinal injury. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003;28:14751480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mirza, SK, Deyo, RA, Heagerty, PJ, et al. Development of an index to characterize the “invasiveness” of spine surgery: validation by comparison to blood loss and operative time. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008;33:26512662.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cizik, AM, Lee, MJ, Martin, BI, et al. Using the spine surgical invasiveness index to identify risk of surgical site infection: a multivariate analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012;94:335342.10.2106/JBJS.J.01084CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inabathula, A, Dilley, JE, Ziemba-Davis, M, et al. Extended oral antibiotic prophylaxis in high-risk patients substantially reduces primary total hip and knee arthroplasty 90-day infection rate. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2018;100:21032109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sartelli, M, Duane, TM, Catena, F, et al. Antimicrobial stewardship: a call to action for surgeons. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2016;17:625631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Warren et al. Supplementary Materials

Warren et al. Supplementary Materials

Download Warren et al. Supplementary Materials(File)
File 23 KB