Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T11:14:32.479Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nosocomial Infection Prevalence, Risk and Control in Small Community and Rural Hospitals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

William E. Scheckler  and
Patty J. Peterson
William E. Scheckler*
Affiliation:
Department of Family Medicine and Practice and the Infectious Disease Section, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin Center for Health Sciences, Madison, Wisconsin
Patty J. Peterson
Affiliation:
Department of Family Medicine and Practice and the Infectious Disease Section, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin Center for Health Sciences, Madison, Wisconsin
*
Department to Family Medicine and Practice, University of Wisconsin, 777 South Mills Street, Madison, WI 53715
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Between 1972 and 1973, Britt and colleagues conducted 1-day infection prevalence surveys in 18 hospitals each with fewer than 75 beds and all located in the rural intermountain west. The lessons learned from that study were incorporated into a book chapter entitled “Infection Control in Small Hospitals” by Dr. Britt. Since that study no substantial nor systematic review of nosocomial infections in small community or rural hospitals has been reported. A recent editorial in Infection Control posed four questions that still needed to be answered for the smaller (less than 100-bed) hospital:

1. Given the statistical realities of small hospitals, what types of surveillance methods—periodic prevalence surveys, general surveillance, focused surveillance, etc.—are the most reliable? Are any of them necessary?

2. Which of the many infection control practices recommended by the CDC, the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals, and others are applicable to small hospitals?

3. What resource sharing of existing expertise, from larger hospitals, health departments, groups such as the Association of Practitioners of Infection Control and the Society of Hospital Epidemiologists of America, and others can be developed for smaller hospitals in cost effective and realistic ways?

4. Should smaller hospitals be required to have the same type of multidisciplinary infection control committees required of larger hospitals or can the responsibilities of the committee be delegated to a smaller group such as one nurse and one staff physician?

The purpose of this report is to provide detailed infection control information obtained from 15 hospitals located in rural areas of Southwestern Wisconsin. This article will focus on data derived from an initial comprehensive prevalence survey that replicated the Britt study in the Wisconsin sites in 1983. Additional data were derived from ongoing bi-monthly prevalence studies done over 6 consecutive months in each of the 15 rural hospitals. Data from 6 months of ongoing comprehensive surveillance from each of the 15 hospitals and final conclusions from the project will be the subject of a subsequent paper.

Type
Research Article
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 7 , supplement S2: Proceedings of the Second ICI/Stuart Workshop , February 1986 , pp. 144 - 148
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Britt, MR, Burke, JP, Nordquist, AG, et al: Infection control in small hospital— Prevalence surveys in 18 institutions. JAMA 1976; 236:1700–1703.Google Scholar
2.Brill, MR: Infection control in small hospitals. CRC Handbook of Hospital Acquired Infections, Wenzel, R (ed). CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 1981; 251–263.Google Scholar
3.Scheckler, WE: Nosocomial infection control and the smaller hospital—What do we know, what do we do? Infect Control 1983; 4:126.Google Scholar
4.White, EC: Rural hospitals band together to regain local market shares. Modern Healthcare July 5, 1985, 172–173.Google Scholar
5.VanHook, RT: The rural hospital: An evolving resource. Business and Health May 1985; 32–36.Google Scholar
6.Size, T: Rural Wisconsin Hospital Cooperative—An evolving systems model based on traditional community values. Summer 1985 eight pages. Available from RWHC. 576 Third Street, Prairie du Sac, WI 53578.Google Scholar
7.Centers for Disease Control: NNIS Site Definitions Manual, 1975.Google Scholar
8.Scheckler, WE, Garner, JS, Kaiser, AB, Bennett, JB: Prevalence of infections and antibiotic usage in eight community hospitals, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Nosocomial Infections, Aug 3-6, 1970. Chicago-American Hospital Association, 1971, pp 299–305.Google Scholar
9.Centers for Disease Control: “NNIS-IDEAS”—A Microcomputer Surveillance System, 1984.Google Scholar
10.Haley, RW, Culver, DH, White, JW, et al: The efficacy of infection surveillance and control programs in preventing nosocomial infections in US hospitals. Am J Epidemiol 1985; 121:182–205.Google Scholar