Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-mggfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-18T00:30:43.186Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intervention to Reduce the Incidence of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Skin Infections in a Correctional Facility in Georgia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Susan H. Wootton ,
Kathryn Arnold ,
Holly A. Hill ,
Sigrid McAllister ,
Marsha Ray ,
Molly Kellum ,
Madie LaMarre ,
Mary Ellen Lane ,
Jasmine Chaitram  and
Susan Lance-Parker
...Show all authors
Susan H. Wootton*
Affiliation:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Epidemiology Program Office, Division of Applied Public Health Training, Epidemic Intelligence Service Branch, Atlanta, Georgia Georgia Department of Human Resources, Division of Public Health, Atlanta, Georgia
Kathryn Arnold
Affiliation:
Georgia Department of Human Resources, Division of Public Health, Atlanta, Georgia
Holly A. Hill
Affiliation:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Infectious Diseases, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Atlanta, Georgia
Sigrid McAllister
Affiliation:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Infectious Diseases, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Atlanta, Georgia
Marsha Ray
Affiliation:
Georgia Department of Human Resources, Division of Public Health, Atlanta, Georgia
Molly Kellum
Affiliation:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Infectious Diseases, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Atlanta, Georgia
Madie LaMarre
Affiliation:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Atlanta, Georgia
Mary Ellen Lane
Affiliation:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Atlanta, Georgia
Jasmine Chaitram
Affiliation:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Infectious Diseases, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Atlanta, Georgia
Susan Lance-Parker
Affiliation:
Georgia Department of Human Resources, Division of Public Health, Atlanta, Georgia
Matthew J. Kuehnert
Affiliation:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Infectious Diseases, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Atlanta, Georgia
*
6621 Fannin Street, Mail Code 3-2371, Houston, TX 77030-2399
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background and Objective:

In August 2001, a cluster of MRSA skin infections was detected in a correctional facility. An investigation was conducted to determine its cause and to prevent further MRSA infections.

Design:

Case-control study.

Setting:

A 200-bed detention center.

Patients:

A case was defined as a detainee with a skin lesion from which MRSA was cultured from July 24 through December 31, 2001. Case-patients were identified by review of laboratory culture results and by skin lesion screening through point-prevalence survey and admission examination. Controls were randomly selected from an alphabetized list of detainees.

Intervention:

Medical staff implemented measures to improve skin disease screening, personal hygiene, wound care, and antimicrobial therapy.

Results:

Sixteen cases were identified: 11, 5, and 0 in the preintervention, peri-intervention, and postintervention periods, respectively. Seven case-patients and 19 controls were included in the case-control study. On multivariable analysis, working as a dormitory orderly (OR, 9.8; CI95, 0.74-638; P= .10) and a stay of longer than 36 days (OR, 6.9; CI95, 0.65-128.2; P = .14) were the strongest predictors for MRSA skin infection. The preintervention, peri-intervention, and postintervention MRSA infection rates were 11.6, 8.8, and 0 per 10,000 detainee-days, respectively. The rate of MRSA skin infections declined significantly between both the preintervention and peri-intervention periods and the postintervention period (P < .01 for both comparisons).

Conclusions:

MRSA skin disease can become an emergent problem in a correctional facility. Interventions targeted at skin disease screening, appropriate antimicrobial treatment, and hygiene may decrease the risk of acquiring MRSA infection in correctional facilities.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 25 , Issue 5 , May 2004 , pp. 402 - 407
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Lowy, FD. Staphylococcus aureus infections. N Engl J Med 1998;339:520–532.Google Scholar
2.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Semiannual Report: Aggregated Data From the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2000. Available at www.cdc.gov/ncidod/hip/surveill/NNIS.htm. Accessed April 22, 2004.Google Scholar
3.U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Corrections Statistics. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics. Available at www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/correct.htm. Accessed April 22, 2004.Google Scholar
4.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically, ed. 5. Wayne, PA: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 2000. Approved standard M7-A5.Google Scholar
5.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Eleventh Informational Supplement. Wayne, PA: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 2001. M100-S11.Google Scholar
6.Maslow, JN, Slutsky, AM, Arbeit, RD. Application of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis to molecular epidemiology. In: Persing, DH, Smith, TF, Tenover, FC, White, TJ, eds. Diagnostic Molecular Microbiology: Principles and Applications. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1993:563–572.Google Scholar
7.Tenover, FC, Arbeit, RD, Goering, RV, et al.Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J Clin Microbiol 1996;33:2233–2239.Google Scholar
8.Martin, DO, Austin, H. An exact method for meta-analysis of case-control and follow-up studies. Epidemiology 2000;11:255–260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus skin or soft tissue infections in a state prison: Mississippi, 2000. MMWR 2001;50:919–922.Google Scholar
10.U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Federal Prison Population Increases a Record Amount: State and Local Inmates Growth Moderate [press release]. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics; 2002. Available at www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/press/pjim01pr.htm. Accessed April 22, 2004.Google Scholar
11.Georgia Department of Corrections. Annual Report, 2000. Atlanta, GA: Georgia Department of Corrections; 2000. Available at www.dcor.state.ga.us/ResearchReports/html/AnnualReport.html. Accessed February 4, 2002.Google Scholar
12.Waldvogel, FA. Staphylococcus aureus. In: Mandell, GL, Bennett, JE, Dolin, R, eds. Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases, ed. 4. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone; 1995:1754–1777.Google Scholar
13.Boyce, JM. Preventing staphylococcal infections by eradicating nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus: proceeding with caution. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1996;17:775–779.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed