Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T06:08:02.633Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Improving Surveillance for Surgical Site Infections Following Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Using Diagnosis and Procedure Codes in a Provincial Surveillance Network

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2016

Alysha Rusk ,
Kathryn Bush ,
Marlene Brandt ,
Christopher Smith ,
Andrea Howatt ,
Blanda Chow  and
Elizabeth Henderson
Alysha Rusk
Affiliation:
Infection Prevention and Control, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Kathryn Bush*
Affiliation:
Infection Prevention and Control, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Marlene Brandt
Affiliation:
Data Integration, Measurement, and Reporting, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Christopher Smith
Affiliation:
Alberta Bone and Joint Health Institute, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Andrea Howatt
Affiliation:
Infection Prevention and Control, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Blanda Chow
Affiliation:
Infection Prevention and Control, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Elizabeth Henderson
Affiliation:
Infection Prevention and Control, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
*
Address correspondence to Kathryn Bush, MSc, Rm 801 ST, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Canada T2N 2T9 ([email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate hospital administrative data to identify potential surgical site infections (SSIs) following primary elective total hip or knee arthroplasty.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

All acute care facilities in Alberta, Canada.

METHODS

Diagnosis and procedure codes for 6 months following total hip or knee arthroplasty were used to identify potential SSI cases. Medical charts of patients with potential SSIs were reviewed by an infection control professional at the acute care facility where the patient was identified with a diagnosis or procedure code. For SSI decision, infection control professionals used the National Healthcare Safety Network SSI definition. The performance of traditional surveillance methods and administrative data–triggered medical chart review was assessed.

RESULTS

Of the 162 patients identified by diagnosis or procedure code, 46 (28%) were confirmed as an SSI by an infection control professional. More SSIs were identified following total hip vs total knee arthroplasty (42% vs16%). Of 46 confirmed SSI cases, 20 (43%) were identified at an acute care facility different than their procedure facility. Administrative data–triggered medical chart review with infection control professional confirmation resulted in a 1.1- to 1.7-fold increase in SSI rate compared with traditional surveillance. SSIs identified by administrative data resulted in sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 99%.

CONCLUSION

Medical chart review for cases identified through administrative data is an efficient supplemental SSI surveillance strategy. It improves case-finding by increasing SSI identification and making identification consistent across facilities, and in a provincial surveillance network it identifies SSIs presenting at nonprocedure facilities.

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;37:699–703

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 37 , Supplement 6 , June 2016 , pp. 699 - 703
Copyright
© 2016 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Leaper, DJ. Surgical-site infection. Br J Surg 2010;97:1601–1602.Google Scholar
2. Lewis, SS, Moehring, RW, Chen, LF, Sexton, DJ, Anderson, DJ. Assessing the relative burden of hospital-acquired infections in a network of community hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013;34:1229–1230.Google Scholar
3. Minnema, B, Vearncombe, M, Augustin, A, Gollish, J, Simor, AE. Risk factors for surgical-site infection following primary total knee arthroplasty. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2004;25:477–480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Kirkland, KB, Briggs, JP, Trivette, SL, Wilkinson, WE, Sexton, DJ. The impact of surgical-site infections in the 1990s: attributable mortality, excess length of hospitalization, and extra costs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999;20:725–730.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Edwards, JR, Peterson, KD, Mu, Y, et al. National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) report: data summary for 2006 through 2008, issued December 2009. Am J Infect Control 2009;37:783–805.Google Scholar
6. Anderson, DJ, Podgorny, K, Berríos-Torres, SI, et al. Strategies to prevent surgical site infections in acute care hospitals: 2014 update. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2014;35:605–627.Google Scholar
7. Brandt, C, Sohr, D, Behnke, M, Daschner, F, Rüden, H, Gastmeier, P. Reduction of surgical site infection rates associated with active surveillance. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006;27:1347–1351.Google Scholar
8. Gaynes, R, Richards, C, Edwards, J, et al. Feeding back surveillance data to prevent hospital-acquired infections. Emerg Infect Dis, 7:295–298.Google Scholar
9. Wilson, J, Charlett, A, Leong, G, McDougall, C, Duckworth, G. Rates of surgical site infection after hip replacement as a hospital performance indicator: analysis of data from the English mandatory surveillance system. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;29:219–226.Google Scholar
10. Calderwood, MS, Kleinman, K, Murphy, MV, Platt, R, Huang, SS. Improving public reporting and data validation for complex surgical site infections after coronary artery bypass graft surgery and hip arthroplasty. Open Forum Infect Dis 2014;1:ofu106.Google Scholar
11. Calderwood, MS, Ma, A, Khan, YM, et al. Use of Medicare diagnosis and procedure codes to improve detection of surgical site infections following hip arthroplasty, knee arthroplasty, and vascular surgery. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2012;33:40–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Haut, ER, Pronovost, PJ. Surveillance bias in outcomes reporting. JAMA 2011;305:2462–2463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Yokoe, DS, Avery, TR, Platt, R, Huang, SS. Reporting surgical site infections following total hip and knee arthroplasty: impact of limiting surveillance to the operative hospital. Clin Infect Dis 2013;57:1282–1288.Google Scholar
14. Gerbier-Colomban, S, Bourjault, M, Cêtre, J-C, Baulieux, J, Metzger, M-H. Evaluation study of different strategies for detecting surgical site infections using the hospital information system at Lyon University Hospital, France. Ann Surg 2012;255:896–900.Google Scholar
15. Surgical site infection (SSI) event. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdfs/pscmanual/9pscssicurrent.pdf. Published 2015. Accessed October 22, 2015.Google Scholar
16. Manniën, J, van den Hof, S, Muilwijk, J, van den Broek, PJ, van Benthem, B, Wille, JC. Trends in the incidence of surgical site infection in the Netherlands. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;29:1132–1138.Google Scholar
17. Rioux, C, Grandbastien, B, Astagneau, P. Impact of a six-year control programme on surgical site infections in France: results of the INCISO surveillance. J Hosp Infect 2007;66:217–223.Google Scholar
18. Miletic, KG, Taylor, TN, Martin, ET, Vaidya, R, Kaye, KS. Readmissions after diagnosis of surgical site infection following knee and hip arthroplasty. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2014;35:152–157.Google Scholar
19. Jhung, MA, Banerjee, SN. Administrative coding data and health care-associated infections. Clin Infect Dis 2009;49:949–955.Google Scholar
20. Goto, M, Ohl, ME, Schweizer, ML, Perencevich, EN. Accuracy of administrative code data for the surveillance of healthcare-associated infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2013;58:688–696.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Rusk supplementary material

Appendix

Download Rusk supplementary material(File)
File 20.2 KB